SLDP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cooper-Standard Holdings has a net margin of -251.85% compared to Solid Power's net margin of 0.23%. Solid Power's return on equity of -20.72% beat Cooper-Standard Holdings's return on equity of --.

Solid Power has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling downside risk potential of -53.42%. On the other hand Cooper-Standard Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $25.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.49%. Given that Cooper-Standard Holdings has higher upside potential than Solid Power, analysts believe Cooper-Standard Holdings is more attractive than Solid Power.

Solid Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cooper-Standard Holdings has a beta of 2.795, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 179.507%.

Solid Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cooper-Standard Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solid Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cooper-Standard Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Solid Power quarterly revenues are $6M, which are smaller than Cooper-Standard Holdings quarterly revenues of $667.1M. Solid Power's net income of -$15.2M is lower than Cooper-Standard Holdings's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Solid Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cooper-Standard Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solid Power is 28.62x versus 0.15x for Cooper-Standard Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gentex has a net margin of -251.85% compared to Solid Power's net margin of 16.45%. Solid Power's return on equity of -20.72% beat Gentex's return on equity of 16.1%.

Solid Power has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling downside risk potential of -53.42%. On the other hand Gentex has an analysts' consensus of $28.51 which suggests that it could grow by 23.26%. Given that Gentex has higher upside potential than Solid Power, analysts believe Gentex is more attractive than Solid Power.

Solid Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gentex has a beta of 0.814, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.642%.

Solid Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gentex offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Solid Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gentex pays out 27.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Gentex's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Solid Power quarterly revenues are $6M, which are smaller than Gentex quarterly revenues of $576.8M. Solid Power's net income of -$15.2M is lower than Gentex's net income of $94.9M. Notably, Solid Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gentex's PE ratio is 13.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solid Power is 28.62x versus 2.26x for Gentex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -251.85% compared to Solid Power's net margin of -3528.43%. Solid Power's return on equity of -20.72% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Solid Power has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling downside risk potential of -53.42%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 26.58%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Solid Power, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Solid Power.

Solid Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.586, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.605%.

Solid Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solid Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Solid Power quarterly revenues are $6M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. Solid Power's net income of -$15.2M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Solid Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solid Power is 28.62x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Optec International has a net margin of -251.85% compared to Solid Power's net margin of --. Solid Power's return on equity of -20.72% beat Optec International's return on equity of --.

Solid Power has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling downside risk potential of -53.42%. On the other hand Optec International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Solid Power has higher upside potential than Optec International, analysts believe Solid Power is more attractive than Optec International.

Solid Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Optec International has a beta of 2.073, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.261%.

Solid Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Optec International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solid Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Optec International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Solid Power quarterly revenues are $6M, which are larger than Optec International quarterly revenues of --. Solid Power's net income of -$15.2M is higher than Optec International's net income of --. Notably, Solid Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Optec International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solid Power is 28.62x versus -- for Optec International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.