ALG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Deere & has a net margin of 8.13% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of 14.4%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 11.49% beat Deere &'s return on equity of 24.4%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of $213.50, signalling upside risk potential of 0.24%. On the other hand Deere & has an analysts' consensus of $549.20 which suggests that it could grow by 8.17%. Given that Deere & has higher upside potential than Alamo Group, analysts believe Deere & is more attractive than Alamo Group.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.086, which suggesting that the stock is 8.558% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deere & has a beta of 1.077, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.706%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.54%. Deere & offers a yield of 1.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Alamo Group pays 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere & pays out 22.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $391M, which are smaller than Deere & quarterly revenues of $12.5B. Alamo Group's net income of $31.8M is lower than Deere &'s net income of $1.8B. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.60x while Deere &'s PE ratio is 24.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.64x versus 3.12x for Deere &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindsay has a net margin of 8.13% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of 11.51%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 11.49% beat Lindsay's return on equity of 15.23%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of $213.50, signalling upside risk potential of 0.24%. On the other hand Lindsay has an analysts' consensus of $143.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.26%. Given that Lindsay has higher upside potential than Alamo Group, analysts believe Lindsay is more attractive than Alamo Group.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.086, which suggesting that the stock is 8.558% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindsay has a beta of 0.820, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.012%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.54%. Lindsay offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Alamo Group pays 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay pays out 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $391M, which are larger than Lindsay quarterly revenues of $169.5M. Alamo Group's net income of $31.8M is higher than Lindsay's net income of $19.5M. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.60x while Lindsay's PE ratio is 19.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.64x versus 2.19x for Lindsay. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Titan International has a net margin of 8.13% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of -0.13%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 11.49% beat Titan International's return on equity of -2.68%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of $213.50, signalling upside risk potential of 0.24%. On the other hand Titan International has an analysts' consensus of $11.60 which suggests that it could grow by 23.14%. Given that Titan International has higher upside potential than Alamo Group, analysts believe Titan International is more attractive than Alamo Group.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.086, which suggesting that the stock is 8.558% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Titan International has a beta of 2.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.131%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.54%. Titan International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamo Group pays 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Titan International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $391M, which are smaller than Titan International quarterly revenues of $490.7M. Alamo Group's net income of $31.8M is higher than Titan International's net income of -$649K. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.60x while Titan International's PE ratio is 18.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.64x versus 0.35x for Titan International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban-gro has a net margin of 8.13% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of -13.78%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 11.49% beat Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of $213.50, signalling upside risk potential of 0.24%. On the other hand Urban-gro has an analysts' consensus of $2.77 which suggests that it could grow by 803.85%. Given that Urban-gro has higher upside potential than Alamo Group, analysts believe Urban-gro is more attractive than Alamo Group.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.086, which suggesting that the stock is 8.558% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban-gro has a beta of 0.835, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.541%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.54%. Urban-gro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamo Group pays 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Urban-gro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $391M, which are larger than Urban-gro quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Alamo Group's net income of $31.8M is higher than Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.60x while Urban-gro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.64x versus 0.06x for Urban-gro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.