UGRO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alamo Group has a net margin of -13.78% compared to Urban-gro's net margin of 8.13%. Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43% beat Alamo Group's return on equity of 11.49%.

Urban-gro has a consensus price target of $2.77, signalling upside risk potential of 803.85%. On the other hand Alamo Group has an analysts' consensus of $213.50 which suggests that it could grow by 0.24%. Given that Urban-gro has higher upside potential than Alamo Group, analysts believe Urban-gro is more attractive than Alamo Group.

Urban-gro has a beta of 0.835, which suggesting that the stock is 16.541% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alamo Group has a beta of 1.086, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.558%.

Urban-gro has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alamo Group offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Urban-gro pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group pays out 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Urban-gro quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are smaller than Alamo Group quarterly revenues of $391M. Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Alamo Group's net income of $31.8M. Notably, Urban-gro's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Alamo Group's PE ratio is 22.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urban-gro is 0.06x versus 1.64x for Alamo Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Deere & has a net margin of -13.78% compared to Urban-gro's net margin of 14.4%. Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43% beat Deere &'s return on equity of 24.4%.

Urban-gro has a consensus price target of $2.77, signalling upside risk potential of 803.85%. On the other hand Deere & has an analysts' consensus of $549.20 which suggests that it could grow by 8.17%. Given that Urban-gro has higher upside potential than Deere &, analysts believe Urban-gro is more attractive than Deere &.

Urban-gro has a beta of 0.835, which suggesting that the stock is 16.541% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deere & has a beta of 1.077, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.706%.

Urban-gro has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Deere & offers a yield of 1.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Urban-gro pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Deere & pays out 22.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Urban-gro quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are smaller than Deere & quarterly revenues of $12.5B. Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Deere &'s net income of $1.8B. Notably, Urban-gro's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Deere &'s PE ratio is 24.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urban-gro is 0.06x versus 3.12x for Deere &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindsay has a net margin of -13.78% compared to Urban-gro's net margin of 11.51%. Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43% beat Lindsay's return on equity of 15.23%.

Urban-gro has a consensus price target of $2.77, signalling upside risk potential of 803.85%. On the other hand Lindsay has an analysts' consensus of $143.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.26%. Given that Urban-gro has higher upside potential than Lindsay, analysts believe Urban-gro is more attractive than Lindsay.

Urban-gro has a beta of 0.835, which suggesting that the stock is 16.541% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindsay has a beta of 0.820, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.012%.

Urban-gro has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lindsay offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Urban-gro pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay pays out 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Urban-gro quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are smaller than Lindsay quarterly revenues of $169.5M. Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Lindsay's net income of $19.5M. Notably, Urban-gro's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lindsay's PE ratio is 19.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urban-gro is 0.06x versus 2.19x for Lindsay. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Titan International has a net margin of -13.78% compared to Urban-gro's net margin of -0.13%. Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43% beat Titan International's return on equity of -2.68%.

Urban-gro has a consensus price target of $2.77, signalling upside risk potential of 803.85%. On the other hand Titan International has an analysts' consensus of $11.60 which suggests that it could grow by 23.14%. Given that Urban-gro has higher upside potential than Titan International, analysts believe Urban-gro is more attractive than Titan International.

Urban-gro has a beta of 0.835, which suggesting that the stock is 16.541% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Titan International has a beta of 2.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.131%.

Urban-gro has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Titan International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Urban-gro pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Titan International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Urban-gro quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are smaller than Titan International quarterly revenues of $490.7M. Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Titan International's net income of -$649K. Notably, Urban-gro's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Titan International's PE ratio is 18.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urban-gro is 0.06x versus 0.35x for Titan International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.