WMG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Walt Disney has a net margin of 2.43% compared to Warner Music Group's net margin of 13.87%. Warner Music Group's return on equity of 66.82% beat The Walt Disney's return on equity of 8.4%.

Warner Music Group has a consensus price target of $33.29, signalling upside risk potential of 7.7%. On the other hand The Walt Disney has an analysts' consensus of $129.48 which suggests that it could grow by 8.06%. Given that The Walt Disney has higher upside potential than Warner Music Group, analysts believe The Walt Disney is more attractive than Warner Music Group.

Warner Music Group has a beta of 1.242, which suggesting that the stock is 24.215% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Walt Disney has a beta of 1.558, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.842%.

Warner Music Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. The Walt Disney offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Warner Music Group pays 82.99% of its earnings as a dividend. The Walt Disney pays out 27.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Warner Music Group quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than The Walt Disney quarterly revenues of $23.6B. Warner Music Group's net income of $36M is lower than The Walt Disney's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Warner Music Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.53x while The Walt Disney's PE ratio is 24.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Warner Music Group is 2.53x versus 2.32x for The Walt Disney. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Liberty Media has a net margin of 2.43% compared to Warner Music Group's net margin of 1.12%. Warner Music Group's return on equity of 66.82% beat Liberty Media's return on equity of -1.44%.

Warner Music Group has a consensus price target of $33.29, signalling upside risk potential of 7.7%. On the other hand Liberty Media has an analysts' consensus of $100.17 which suggests that it could grow by 9.45%. Given that Liberty Media has higher upside potential than Warner Music Group, analysts believe Liberty Media is more attractive than Warner Music Group.

Warner Music Group has a beta of 1.242, which suggesting that the stock is 24.215% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liberty Media has a beta of 0.866, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.431%.

Warner Music Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. Liberty Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.23 per share. Warner Music Group pays 82.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Liberty Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Warner Music Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Warner Music Group quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Liberty Media quarterly revenues of $447M. Warner Music Group's net income of $36M is higher than Liberty Media's net income of $5M. Notably, Warner Music Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.53x while Liberty Media's PE ratio is 73.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Warner Music Group is 2.53x versus 6.43x for Liberty Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gaia has a net margin of 2.43% compared to Warner Music Group's net margin of -4.25%. Warner Music Group's return on equity of 66.82% beat Gaia's return on equity of -5.53%.

Warner Music Group has a consensus price target of $33.29, signalling upside risk potential of 7.7%. On the other hand Gaia has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 99.5%. Given that Gaia has higher upside potential than Warner Music Group, analysts believe Gaia is more attractive than Warner Music Group.

Warner Music Group has a beta of 1.242, which suggesting that the stock is 24.215% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gaia has a beta of 0.980, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.989%.

Warner Music Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. Gaia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Warner Music Group pays 82.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Gaia pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Warner Music Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Warner Music Group quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Gaia quarterly revenues of $23.8M. Warner Music Group's net income of $36M is higher than Gaia's net income of -$1M. Notably, Warner Music Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.53x while Gaia's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Warner Music Group is 2.53x versus 1.02x for Gaia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Global has a net margin of 2.43% compared to Warner Music Group's net margin of 2.11%. Warner Music Group's return on equity of 66.82% beat Paramount Global's return on equity of -30.44%.

Warner Music Group has a consensus price target of $33.29, signalling upside risk potential of 7.7%. On the other hand Paramount Global has an analysts' consensus of $11.98 which suggests that it could fall by -7.63%. Given that Warner Music Group has higher upside potential than Paramount Global, analysts believe Warner Music Group is more attractive than Paramount Global.

Warner Music Group has a beta of 1.242, which suggesting that the stock is 24.215% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Global has a beta of 1.194, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.406%.

Warner Music Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. Paramount Global offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Warner Music Group pays 82.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Global pays out -2.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Warner Music Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Warner Music Group quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Paramount Global quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Warner Music Group's net income of $36M is lower than Paramount Global's net income of $152M. Notably, Warner Music Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.53x while Paramount Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Warner Music Group is 2.53x versus 0.30x for Paramount Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.