SSYS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Key Tronic has a net margin of -9.6% compared to Stratasys's net margin of -0.54%. Stratasys's return on equity of -13.01% beat Key Tronic's return on equity of -5.17%.

Stratasys has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 39.52%. On the other hand Key Tronic has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 211.45%. Given that Key Tronic has higher upside potential than Stratasys, analysts believe Key Tronic is more attractive than Stratasys.

Stratasys has a beta of 1.535, which suggesting that the stock is 53.546% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Key Tronic has a beta of 1.057, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.656%.

Stratasys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Key Tronic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stratasys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Key Tronic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stratasys quarterly revenues are $136M, which are larger than Key Tronic quarterly revenues of $112M. Stratasys's net income of -$13.1M is lower than Key Tronic's net income of -$604K. Notably, Stratasys's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Key Tronic's PE ratio is 214.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stratasys is 1.39x versus 0.07x for Key Tronic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lumentum Holdings has a net margin of -9.6% compared to Stratasys's net margin of -10.37%. Stratasys's return on equity of -13.01% beat Lumentum Holdings's return on equity of -46%.

Stratasys has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 39.52%. On the other hand Lumentum Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $96.71 which suggests that it could fall by -2.94%. Given that Stratasys has higher upside potential than Lumentum Holdings, analysts believe Stratasys is more attractive than Lumentum Holdings.

Stratasys has a beta of 1.535, which suggesting that the stock is 53.546% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumentum Holdings has a beta of 1.345, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.501%.

Stratasys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lumentum Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stratasys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lumentum Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stratasys quarterly revenues are $136M, which are smaller than Lumentum Holdings quarterly revenues of $425.2M. Stratasys's net income of -$13.1M is higher than Lumentum Holdings's net income of -$44.1M. Notably, Stratasys's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lumentum Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stratasys is 1.39x versus 4.64x for Lumentum Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Cat Holdings has a net margin of -9.6% compared to Stratasys's net margin of -1418.91%. Stratasys's return on equity of -13.01% beat Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -154.1%.

Stratasys has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 39.52%. On the other hand Red Cat Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $13.33 which suggests that it could grow by 16.35%. Given that Stratasys has higher upside potential than Red Cat Holdings, analysts believe Stratasys is more attractive than Red Cat Holdings.

Stratasys has a beta of 1.535, which suggesting that the stock is 53.546% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.780, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.971%.

Stratasys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Cat Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stratasys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Cat Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stratasys quarterly revenues are $136M, which are larger than Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.6M. Stratasys's net income of -$13.1M is higher than Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$23.1M. Notably, Stratasys's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Red Cat Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stratasys is 1.39x versus 72.60x for Red Cat Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unusual Machines has a net margin of -9.6% compared to Stratasys's net margin of -159.93%. Stratasys's return on equity of -13.01% beat Unusual Machines's return on equity of -187.31%.

Stratasys has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 39.52%. On the other hand Unusual Machines has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could grow by 46.34%. Given that Unusual Machines has higher upside potential than Stratasys, analysts believe Unusual Machines is more attractive than Stratasys.

Stratasys has a beta of 1.535, which suggesting that the stock is 53.546% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unusual Machines has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Stratasys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Unusual Machines offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stratasys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Unusual Machines pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stratasys quarterly revenues are $136M, which are larger than Unusual Machines quarterly revenues of $2M. Stratasys's net income of -$13.1M is lower than Unusual Machines's net income of -$3.3M. Notably, Stratasys's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Unusual Machines's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stratasys is 1.39x versus 18.98x for Unusual Machines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.