RCAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lumentum Holdings has a net margin of -1418.91% compared to Red Cat Holdings's net margin of -10.37%. Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -154.1% beat Lumentum Holdings's return on equity of -46%.

Red Cat Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.33, signalling upside risk potential of 16.35%. On the other hand Lumentum Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $96.71 which suggests that it could fall by -2.94%. Given that Red Cat Holdings has higher upside potential than Lumentum Holdings, analysts believe Red Cat Holdings is more attractive than Lumentum Holdings.

Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.780, which suggesting that the stock is 21.971% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumentum Holdings has a beta of 1.345, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.501%.

Red Cat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lumentum Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Cat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lumentum Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.6M, which are smaller than Lumentum Holdings quarterly revenues of $425.2M. Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$23.1M is higher than Lumentum Holdings's net income of -$44.1M. Notably, Red Cat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lumentum Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Cat Holdings is 72.60x versus 4.64x for Lumentum Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stratasys has a net margin of -1418.91% compared to Red Cat Holdings's net margin of -9.6%. Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -154.1% beat Stratasys's return on equity of -13.01%.

Red Cat Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.33, signalling upside risk potential of 16.35%. On the other hand Stratasys has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 39.52%. Given that Stratasys has higher upside potential than Red Cat Holdings, analysts believe Stratasys is more attractive than Red Cat Holdings.

Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.780, which suggesting that the stock is 21.971% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stratasys has a beta of 1.535, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.546%.

Red Cat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stratasys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Cat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stratasys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.6M, which are smaller than Stratasys quarterly revenues of $136M. Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$23.1M is lower than Stratasys's net income of -$13.1M. Notably, Red Cat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Stratasys's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Cat Holdings is 72.60x versus 1.39x for Stratasys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AgEagle Aerial Systems has a net margin of -1418.91% compared to Red Cat Holdings's net margin of -105.32%. Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -154.1% beat AgEagle Aerial Systems's return on equity of -497.03%.

Red Cat Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.33, signalling upside risk potential of 16.35%. On the other hand AgEagle Aerial Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1184.25%. Given that AgEagle Aerial Systems has higher upside potential than Red Cat Holdings, analysts believe AgEagle Aerial Systems is more attractive than Red Cat Holdings.

Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.780, which suggesting that the stock is 21.971% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AgEagle Aerial Systems has a beta of 3.269, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 226.891%.

Red Cat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AgEagle Aerial Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Cat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AgEagle Aerial Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.6M, which are smaller than AgEagle Aerial Systems quarterly revenues of $3.6M. Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$23.1M is lower than AgEagle Aerial Systems's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Red Cat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AgEagle Aerial Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Cat Holdings is 72.60x versus 0.29x for AgEagle Aerial Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unusual Machines has a net margin of -1418.91% compared to Red Cat Holdings's net margin of -159.93%. Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -154.1% beat Unusual Machines's return on equity of -187.31%.

Red Cat Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.33, signalling upside risk potential of 16.35%. On the other hand Unusual Machines has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could grow by 46.34%. Given that Unusual Machines has higher upside potential than Red Cat Holdings, analysts believe Unusual Machines is more attractive than Red Cat Holdings.

Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.780, which suggesting that the stock is 21.971% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unusual Machines has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Red Cat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Unusual Machines offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Cat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Unusual Machines pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.6M, which are smaller than Unusual Machines quarterly revenues of $2M. Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$23.1M is lower than Unusual Machines's net income of -$3.3M. Notably, Red Cat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Unusual Machines's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Cat Holdings is 72.60x versus 18.98x for Unusual Machines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.