SNT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a net margin of 12.06% compared to Senstar Technologies's net margin of -99.31%. Senstar Technologies's return on equity of 11.81% beat Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's return on equity of -25.77%.

Senstar Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.25 which suggests that it could grow by 185.33%. Given that Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Senstar Technologies, analysts believe Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is more attractive than Senstar Technologies.

Senstar Technologies has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 1.031% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Senstar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Senstar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Senstar Technologies quarterly revenues are $8.4M, which are smaller than Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $15.6M. Senstar Technologies's net income of $1M is higher than Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net income of -$15.5M. Notably, Senstar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.68x while Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Senstar Technologies is 2.86x versus 1.03x for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CoreCivic has a net margin of 12.06% compared to Senstar Technologies's net margin of 5.14%. Senstar Technologies's return on equity of 11.81% beat CoreCivic's return on equity of 5.76%.

Senstar Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CoreCivic has an analysts' consensus of $31.50 which suggests that it could grow by 47.61%. Given that CoreCivic has higher upside potential than Senstar Technologies, analysts believe CoreCivic is more attractive than Senstar Technologies.

Senstar Technologies has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 1.031% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CoreCivic has a beta of 0.773, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.703%.

Senstar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CoreCivic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Senstar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CoreCivic pays out 0.2% of its earnings as a dividend. CoreCivic's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Senstar Technologies quarterly revenues are $8.4M, which are smaller than CoreCivic quarterly revenues of $488.6M. Senstar Technologies's net income of $1M is lower than CoreCivic's net income of $25.1M. Notably, Senstar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.68x while CoreCivic's PE ratio is 28.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Senstar Technologies is 2.86x versus 1.22x for CoreCivic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a net margin of 12.06% compared to Senstar Technologies's net margin of 1.49%. Senstar Technologies's return on equity of 11.81% beat Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's return on equity of 1.45%.

Senstar Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $50.67 which suggests that it could fall by -13.99%. Given that Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has higher upside potential than Senstar Technologies, analysts believe Kratos Defense & Security Solutions is more attractive than Senstar Technologies.

Senstar Technologies has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 1.031% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a beta of 1.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.629%.

Senstar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Senstar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Senstar Technologies quarterly revenues are $8.4M, which are smaller than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions quarterly revenues of $302.6M. Senstar Technologies's net income of $1M is lower than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's net income of $4.5M. Notably, Senstar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.68x while Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's PE ratio is 453.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Senstar Technologies is 2.86x versus 7.91x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Network-1 Technologies has a net margin of 12.06% compared to Senstar Technologies's net margin of -242%. Senstar Technologies's return on equity of 11.81% beat Network-1 Technologies's return on equity of -5.43%.

Senstar Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Network-1 Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Senstar Technologies has higher upside potential than Network-1 Technologies, analysts believe Senstar Technologies is more attractive than Network-1 Technologies.

Senstar Technologies has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 1.031% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Network-1 Technologies has a beta of 0.062, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.757%.

Senstar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Network-1 Technologies offers a yield of 7.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Senstar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Network-1 Technologies pays out -77.98% of its earnings as a dividend.

Senstar Technologies quarterly revenues are $8.4M, which are larger than Network-1 Technologies quarterly revenues of $150K. Senstar Technologies's net income of $1M is higher than Network-1 Technologies's net income of -$363K. Notably, Senstar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.68x while Network-1 Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Senstar Technologies is 2.86x versus -- for Network-1 Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.