BAER Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a net margin of -99.31% compared to Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net margin of 1.49%. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's return on equity of -25.77% beat Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's return on equity of 1.45%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $5.25, signalling upside risk potential of 193.3%. On the other hand Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $50.67 which suggests that it could fall by -6.66%. Given that Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, analysts believe Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is more attractive than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a beta of 1.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.629%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $15.6M, which are smaller than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions quarterly revenues of $302.6M. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net income of -$15.5M is lower than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's net income of $4.5M. Notably, Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's PE ratio is 417.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is 1.00x versus 7.29x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercury Systems has a net margin of -99.31% compared to Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net margin of -9.07%. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's return on equity of -25.77% beat Mercury Systems's return on equity of -4.45%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $5.25, signalling upside risk potential of 193.3%. On the other hand Mercury Systems has an analysts' consensus of $52.71 which suggests that it could grow by 2%. Given that Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Mercury Systems, analysts believe Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is more attractive than Mercury Systems.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury Systems has a beta of 0.708, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.174%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mercury Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $15.6M, which are smaller than Mercury Systems quarterly revenues of $211.4M. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net income of -$15.5M is higher than Mercury Systems's net income of -$19.2M. Notably, Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mercury Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is 1.00x versus 3.41x for Mercury Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Network-1 Technologies has a net margin of -99.31% compared to Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net margin of -242%. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's return on equity of -25.77% beat Network-1 Technologies's return on equity of -5.43%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $5.25, signalling upside risk potential of 193.3%. On the other hand Network-1 Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Network-1 Technologies, analysts believe Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is more attractive than Network-1 Technologies.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Network-1 Technologies has a beta of 0.062, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.757%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Network-1 Technologies offers a yield of 7.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Network-1 Technologies pays out -77.98% of its earnings as a dividend.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $15.6M, which are larger than Network-1 Technologies quarterly revenues of $150K. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net income of -$15.5M is lower than Network-1 Technologies's net income of -$363K. Notably, Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Network-1 Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is 1.00x versus -- for Network-1 Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Senstar Technologies has a net margin of -99.31% compared to Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net margin of 12.06%. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's return on equity of -25.77% beat Senstar Technologies's return on equity of 11.81%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $5.25, signalling upside risk potential of 193.3%. On the other hand Senstar Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Senstar Technologies, analysts believe Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is more attractive than Senstar Technologies.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Senstar Technologies has a beta of 1.010, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.031%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Senstar Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Senstar Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $15.6M, which are larger than Senstar Technologies quarterly revenues of $8.4M. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net income of -$15.5M is lower than Senstar Technologies's net income of $1M. Notably, Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Senstar Technologies's PE ratio is 23.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is 1.00x versus 2.88x for Senstar Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.