SBFG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

OptimumBank Holdings has a net margin of 14.03% compared to SB Financial Group's net margin of 36.31%. SB Financial Group's return on equity of 8.78% beat OptimumBank Holdings's return on equity of 15.42%.

SB Financial Group has a consensus price target of $23.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.48%. On the other hand OptimumBank Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.87%. Given that SB Financial Group has higher upside potential than OptimumBank Holdings, analysts believe SB Financial Group is more attractive than OptimumBank Holdings.

SB Financial Group has a beta of 0.255, which suggesting that the stock is 74.55% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OptimumBank Holdings has a beta of 0.473, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.678%.

SB Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.01%. OptimumBank Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SB Financial Group pays 32.87% of its earnings as a dividend. OptimumBank Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SB Financial Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SB Financial Group quarterly revenues are $15.4M, which are larger than OptimumBank Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.7M. SB Financial Group's net income of $2.2M is lower than OptimumBank Holdings's net income of $3.9M. Notably, SB Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.32x while OptimumBank Holdings's PE ratio is 3.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SB Financial Group is 2.15x versus 1.21x for OptimumBank Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 14.03% compared to SB Financial Group's net margin of 32.4%. SB Financial Group's return on equity of 8.78% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.97%.

SB Financial Group has a consensus price target of $23.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.48%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $172.67 which suggests that it could grow by 1.08%. Given that SB Financial Group has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe SB Financial Group is more attractive than Park National.

SB Financial Group has a beta of 0.255, which suggesting that the stock is 74.55% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.821, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.866%.

SB Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.01%. Park National offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. SB Financial Group pays 32.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SB Financial Group quarterly revenues are $15.4M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $130.1M. SB Financial Group's net income of $2.2M is lower than Park National's net income of $42.2M. Notably, SB Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.32x while Park National's PE ratio is 17.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SB Financial Group is 2.15x versus 5.25x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 14.03% compared to SB Financial Group's net margin of 24.09%. SB Financial Group's return on equity of 8.78% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.46%.

SB Financial Group has a consensus price target of $23.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.48%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $72.50 which suggests that it could grow by 11.5%. Given that SB Financial Group has higher upside potential than Tompkins Financial, analysts believe SB Financial Group is more attractive than Tompkins Financial.

SB Financial Group has a beta of 0.255, which suggesting that the stock is 74.55% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.793%.

SB Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.01%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. SB Financial Group pays 32.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SB Financial Group quarterly revenues are $15.4M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $81.7M. SB Financial Group's net income of $2.2M is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, SB Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.32x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 12.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SB Financial Group is 2.15x versus 3.04x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Univest Financial has a net margin of 14.03% compared to SB Financial Group's net margin of 28.28%. SB Financial Group's return on equity of 8.78% beat Univest Financial's return on equity of 8.94%.

SB Financial Group has a consensus price target of $23.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.48%. On the other hand Univest Financial has an analysts' consensus of $31.67 which suggests that it could grow by 0.53%. Given that SB Financial Group has higher upside potential than Univest Financial, analysts believe SB Financial Group is more attractive than Univest Financial.

SB Financial Group has a beta of 0.255, which suggesting that the stock is 74.55% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Univest Financial has a beta of 0.735, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.539%.

SB Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.01%. Univest Financial offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. SB Financial Group pays 32.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Univest Financial pays out 32.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SB Financial Group quarterly revenues are $15.4M, which are smaller than Univest Financial quarterly revenues of $79.2M. SB Financial Group's net income of $2.2M is lower than Univest Financial's net income of $22.4M. Notably, SB Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.32x while Univest Financial's PE ratio is 11.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SB Financial Group is 2.15x versus 3.07x for Univest Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.