NVDA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 42.61% compared to NVIDIA's net margin of 9.53%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 3.91%.

NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $178.38, signalling upside risk potential of 4.5%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $138.69 which suggests that it could fall by -10.87%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Advanced Micro Devices, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Advanced Micro Devices.

NVIDIA has a beta of 2.130, which suggesting that the stock is 113.014% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 2.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.692%.

NVIDIA has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.02%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NVIDIA pays 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NVIDIA quarterly revenues are $44.1B, which are larger than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.4B. NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $709M. Notably, NVIDIA's price-to-earnings ratio is 55.06x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 114.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NVIDIA is 28.43x versus 9.16x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 42.61% compared to NVIDIA's net margin of -6.48%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.53%.

NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $178.38, signalling upside risk potential of 4.5%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $21.52 which suggests that it could fall by -6.11%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Intel.

NVIDIA has a beta of 2.130, which suggesting that the stock is 113.014% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.352%.

NVIDIA has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.02%. Intel offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. NVIDIA pays 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NVIDIA quarterly revenues are $44.1B, which are larger than Intel quarterly revenues of $12.7B. NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B is higher than Intel's net income of -$821M. Notably, NVIDIA's price-to-earnings ratio is 55.06x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NVIDIA is 28.43x versus 1.86x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 42.61% compared to NVIDIA's net margin of 35.53%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12% beat KLA's return on equity of 104.91%.

NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $178.38, signalling upside risk potential of 4.5%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $830.45 which suggests that it could fall by -11.33%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than KLA.

NVIDIA has a beta of 2.130, which suggesting that the stock is 113.014% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.423, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.272%.

NVIDIA has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.02%. KLA offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. NVIDIA pays 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NVIDIA quarterly revenues are $44.1B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B is higher than KLA's net income of $1.1B. Notably, NVIDIA's price-to-earnings ratio is 55.06x while KLA's PE ratio is 34.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NVIDIA is 28.43x versus 10.90x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 42.61% compared to NVIDIA's net margin of 9.39%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -3.57%.

NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $178.38, signalling upside risk potential of 4.5%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $90.27 which suggests that it could grow by 24.67%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than NVIDIA.

NVIDIA has a beta of 2.130, which suggesting that the stock is 113.014% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.814, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.355%.

NVIDIA has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.02%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. NVIDIA pays 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NVIDIA quarterly revenues are $44.1B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.9B. NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $177.9M. Notably, NVIDIA's price-to-earnings ratio is 55.06x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NVIDIA is 28.43x versus 9.67x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.