Financhill
Buy
52

QUBT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$19.77
Seasonality move :
5.38%
Day range:
$17.62 - $18.58
52-week range:
$0.53 - $27.15
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
5,352.00x
P/B ratio:
11.74x
Volume:
20.7M
Avg. volume:
32.8M
1-year change:
2491.55%
Market cap:
$2.6B
Revenue:
$373K
EPS (TTM):
-$0.55

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
QUBT
Quantum Computing
$100K -$0.06 98.02% -- $18.50
IONQ
IonQ
$17.3M -$0.14 51.36% -21.11% $44.17
NVDA
NVIDIA
$43.2B $0.75 51.75% 48.94% $179.06
RGTI
Rigetti Computing
$1.9M -$0.04 -38.91% -42.86% $15.17
SMCI
Super Micro Computer
$5.9B $0.44 9.73% -20.32% $44.23
UAVS
AgEagle Aerial Systems
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
QUBT
Quantum Computing
$18.40 $18.50 $2.6B -- $0.00 0% 5,352.00x
IONQ
IonQ
$43.54 $44.17 $10.8B -- $0.00 0% 220.62x
NVDA
NVIDIA
$171.37 $179.06 $4.2T 55.28x $0.01 0.02% 28.54x
RGTI
Rigetti Computing
$16.56 $15.17 $4.8B -- $0.00 0% 399.42x
SMCI
Super Micro Computer
$53.22 $44.23 $31.8B 28.00x $0.00 0% 1.57x
UAVS
AgEagle Aerial Systems
$1.46 -- $20.3M -- $0.00 0% 0.29x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
QUBT
Quantum Computing
-- 16.085 -- 44.48x
IONQ
IonQ
-- 5.878 -- 12.44x
NVDA
NVIDIA
9.17% 1.862 0.32% 2.82x
RGTI
Rigetti Computing
-- -5.306 -- 18.45x
SMCI
Super Micro Computer
28.09% 2.258 12.2% 3.64x
UAVS
AgEagle Aerial Systems
19.06% 11.321 5.95% 0.88x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
QUBT
Quantum Computing
$13K -$8.3M -41.16% -41.65% 43692.31% -$6.2M
IONQ
IonQ
$3.3M -$75.7M -64.15% -64.15% -1000.25% -$36.4M
NVDA
NVIDIA
$26.7B $21.6B 101.04% 114.12% 49.87% $26.2B
RGTI
Rigetti Computing
$442K -$21.6M -92.56% -99.09% 2895.31% -$16.2M
SMCI
Super Micro Computer
$440.2M $146.8M 14.49% 19.84% 2.79% $594.1M
UAVS
AgEagle Aerial Systems
$2.1M -$1M -251.39% -497.03% 195.03% -$1.3M

Quantum Computing vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns QUBT or IONQ?

    IonQ has a net margin of -82640.32% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of -426.28%. Quantum Computing's return on equity of -41.65% beat IonQ's return on equity of -64.15%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    QUBT
    Quantum Computing
    33.33% $0.11 $220.8M
    IONQ
    IonQ
    42.97% -$0.14 $765M
  • What do Analysts Say About QUBT or IONQ?

    Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of $18.50, signalling upside risk potential of 0.54%. On the other hand IonQ has an analysts' consensus of $44.17 which suggests that it could grow by 1.44%. Given that IonQ has higher upside potential than Quantum Computing, analysts believe IonQ is more attractive than Quantum Computing.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    QUBT
    Quantum Computing
    1 1 0
    IONQ
    IonQ
    4 1 0
  • Is QUBT or IONQ More Risky?

    Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.962, which suggesting that the stock is 296.224% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IonQ has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock QUBT or IONQ?

    Quantum Computing has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IonQ offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quantum Computing pays -0.31% of its earnings as a dividend. IonQ pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios QUBT or IONQ?

    Quantum Computing quarterly revenues are $39K, which are smaller than IonQ quarterly revenues of $7.6M. Quantum Computing's net income of $17M is higher than IonQ's net income of -$32.3M. Notably, Quantum Computing's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IonQ's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum Computing is 5,352.00x versus 220.62x for IonQ. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    QUBT
    Quantum Computing
    5,352.00x -- $39K $17M
    IONQ
    IonQ
    220.62x -- $7.6M -$32.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns QUBT or NVDA?

    NVIDIA has a net margin of -82640.32% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 42.61%. Quantum Computing's return on equity of -41.65% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    QUBT
    Quantum Computing
    33.33% $0.11 $220.8M
    NVDA
    NVIDIA
    60.52% $0.76 $92.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About QUBT or NVDA?

    Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of $18.50, signalling upside risk potential of 0.54%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $179.06 which suggests that it could grow by 4.49%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Quantum Computing, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Quantum Computing.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    QUBT
    Quantum Computing
    1 1 0
    NVDA
    NVIDIA
    49 6 1
  • Is QUBT or NVDA More Risky?

    Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.962, which suggesting that the stock is 296.224% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.014%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock QUBT or NVDA?

    Quantum Computing has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Quantum Computing pays -0.31% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios QUBT or NVDA?

    Quantum Computing quarterly revenues are $39K, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $44.1B. Quantum Computing's net income of $17M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B. Notably, Quantum Computing's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 55.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum Computing is 5,352.00x versus 28.54x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    QUBT
    Quantum Computing
    5,352.00x -- $39K $17M
    NVDA
    NVIDIA
    28.54x 55.28x $44.1B $18.8B
  • Which has Higher Returns QUBT or RGTI?

    Rigetti Computing has a net margin of -82640.32% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of -6726.52%. Quantum Computing's return on equity of -41.65% beat Rigetti Computing's return on equity of -99.09%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    QUBT
    Quantum Computing
    33.33% $0.11 $220.8M
    RGTI
    Rigetti Computing
    30.03% $0.15 $207.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About QUBT or RGTI?

    Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of $18.50, signalling upside risk potential of 0.54%. On the other hand Rigetti Computing has an analysts' consensus of $15.17 which suggests that it could fall by -8.41%. Given that Quantum Computing has higher upside potential than Rigetti Computing, analysts believe Quantum Computing is more attractive than Rigetti Computing.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    QUBT
    Quantum Computing
    1 1 0
    RGTI
    Rigetti Computing
    6 0 0
  • Is QUBT or RGTI More Risky?

    Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.962, which suggesting that the stock is 296.224% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rigetti Computing has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock QUBT or RGTI?

    Quantum Computing has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rigetti Computing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quantum Computing pays -0.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Rigetti Computing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios QUBT or RGTI?

    Quantum Computing quarterly revenues are $39K, which are smaller than Rigetti Computing quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Quantum Computing's net income of $17M is lower than Rigetti Computing's net income of $42.6M. Notably, Quantum Computing's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rigetti Computing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum Computing is 5,352.00x versus 399.42x for Rigetti Computing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    QUBT
    Quantum Computing
    5,352.00x -- $39K $17M
    RGTI
    Rigetti Computing
    399.42x -- $1.5M $42.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns QUBT or SMCI?

    Super Micro Computer has a net margin of -82640.32% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 2.37%. Quantum Computing's return on equity of -41.65% beat Super Micro Computer's return on equity of 19.84%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    QUBT
    Quantum Computing
    33.33% $0.11 $220.8M
    SMCI
    Super Micro Computer
    9.57% $0.17 $8.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About QUBT or SMCI?

    Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of $18.50, signalling upside risk potential of 0.54%. On the other hand Super Micro Computer has an analysts' consensus of $44.23 which suggests that it could fall by -16.89%. Given that Quantum Computing has higher upside potential than Super Micro Computer, analysts believe Quantum Computing is more attractive than Super Micro Computer.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    QUBT
    Quantum Computing
    1 1 0
    SMCI
    Super Micro Computer
    3 11 1
  • Is QUBT or SMCI More Risky?

    Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.962, which suggesting that the stock is 296.224% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Super Micro Computer has a beta of 1.431, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.087%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock QUBT or SMCI?

    Quantum Computing has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Super Micro Computer offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quantum Computing pays -0.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Super Micro Computer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios QUBT or SMCI?

    Quantum Computing quarterly revenues are $39K, which are smaller than Super Micro Computer quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Quantum Computing's net income of $17M is lower than Super Micro Computer's net income of $108.8M. Notably, Quantum Computing's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Super Micro Computer's PE ratio is 28.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum Computing is 5,352.00x versus 1.57x for Super Micro Computer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    QUBT
    Quantum Computing
    5,352.00x -- $39K $17M
    SMCI
    Super Micro Computer
    1.57x 28.00x $4.6B $108.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns QUBT or UAVS?

    AgEagle Aerial Systems has a net margin of -82640.32% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of -105.32%. Quantum Computing's return on equity of -41.65% beat AgEagle Aerial Systems's return on equity of -497.03%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    QUBT
    Quantum Computing
    33.33% $0.11 $220.8M
    UAVS
    AgEagle Aerial Systems
    58.47% -$4.50 $5.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About QUBT or UAVS?

    Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of $18.50, signalling upside risk potential of 0.54%. On the other hand AgEagle Aerial Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1184.25%. Given that AgEagle Aerial Systems has higher upside potential than Quantum Computing, analysts believe AgEagle Aerial Systems is more attractive than Quantum Computing.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    QUBT
    Quantum Computing
    1 1 0
    UAVS
    AgEagle Aerial Systems
    0 0 0
  • Is QUBT or UAVS More Risky?

    Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.962, which suggesting that the stock is 296.224% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AgEagle Aerial Systems has a beta of 3.269, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 226.891%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock QUBT or UAVS?

    Quantum Computing has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AgEagle Aerial Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quantum Computing pays -0.31% of its earnings as a dividend. AgEagle Aerial Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios QUBT or UAVS?

    Quantum Computing quarterly revenues are $39K, which are smaller than AgEagle Aerial Systems quarterly revenues of $3.6M. Quantum Computing's net income of $17M is higher than AgEagle Aerial Systems's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Quantum Computing's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AgEagle Aerial Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum Computing is 5,352.00x versus 0.29x for AgEagle Aerial Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    QUBT
    Quantum Computing
    5,352.00x -- $39K $17M
    UAVS
    AgEagle Aerial Systems
    0.29x -- $3.6M $7.1M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?

GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…

Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?

Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…

Can Levi Stock Double?
Can Levi Stock Double?

Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…

Stock Ideas

Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 58x

Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Alerts

Buy
82
SBET alert for Jul 17

SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 2.6% over the past day.

Buy
89
EXOD alert for Jul 17

Exodus Movement [EXOD] is down 4.14% over the past day.

Buy
60
U alert for Jul 17

Unity Software [U] is up 7.51% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock