MPWR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Microchip Technology has a net margin of 20.99% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of -15.93%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 69.91% beat Microchip Technology's return on equity of -0.01%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $793.02, signalling upside risk potential of 11.14%. On the other hand Microchip Technology has an analysts' consensus of $71.93 which suggests that it could fall by -3.19%. Given that Monolithic Power Systems has higher upside potential than Microchip Technology, analysts believe Monolithic Power Systems is more attractive than Microchip Technology.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microchip Technology has a beta of 1.519, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.855%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Microchip Technology offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Microchip Technology pays out -195140% of its earnings as a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $637.6M, which are smaller than Microchip Technology quarterly revenues of $970.5M. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $133.8M is higher than Microchip Technology's net income of -$154.6M. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.94x while Microchip Technology's PE ratio is 87.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 14.53x versus 9.12x for Microchip Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 20.99% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of 9.39%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 69.91% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -3.57%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $793.02, signalling upside risk potential of 11.14%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $90.27 which suggests that it could grow by 25.36%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Monolithic Power Systems, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Monolithic Power Systems.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.814, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.355%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $637.6M, which are smaller than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $133.8M is lower than Marvell Technology's net income of $177.9M. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.94x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 14.53x versus 9.62x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 20.99% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of 42.61%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 69.91% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $793.02, signalling upside risk potential of 11.14%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $179.06 which suggests that it could grow by 3.5%. Given that Monolithic Power Systems has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Monolithic Power Systems is more attractive than NVIDIA.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.014%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $637.6M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $44.1B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $133.8M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.94x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 55.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 14.53x versus 28.81x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Instruments has a net margin of 20.99% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of 28.98%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 69.91% beat Texas Instruments's return on equity of 28.74%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $793.02, signalling upside risk potential of 11.14%. On the other hand Texas Instruments has an analysts' consensus of $193.74 which suggests that it could fall by -11.09%. Given that Monolithic Power Systems has higher upside potential than Texas Instruments, analysts believe Monolithic Power Systems is more attractive than Texas Instruments.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Instruments has a beta of 1.026, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.584%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Texas Instruments offers a yield of 2.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Instruments pays out 99.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $637.6M, which are smaller than Texas Instruments quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $133.8M is lower than Texas Instruments's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.94x while Texas Instruments's PE ratio is 41.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 14.53x versus 12.40x for Texas Instruments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.