LSCC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadcom has a net margin of 4.18% compared to Lattice Semiconductor's net margin of 33.09%. Lattice Semiconductor's return on equity of 7.33% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 18.85%.

Lattice Semiconductor has a consensus price target of $63.07, signalling upside risk potential of 21.52%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $290.23 which suggests that it could grow by 1.32%. Given that Lattice Semiconductor has higher upside potential than Broadcom, analysts believe Lattice Semiconductor is more attractive than Broadcom.

Lattice Semiconductor has a beta of 1.522, which suggesting that the stock is 52.162% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.124, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.433%.

Lattice Semiconductor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadcom offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Lattice Semiconductor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend.

Lattice Semiconductor quarterly revenues are $120.2M, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $15B. Lattice Semiconductor's net income of $5M is lower than Broadcom's net income of $5B. Notably, Lattice Semiconductor's price-to-earnings ratio is 140.27x while Broadcom's PE ratio is 107.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lattice Semiconductor is 14.68x versus 24.04x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 4.18% compared to Lattice Semiconductor's net margin of -6.48%. Lattice Semiconductor's return on equity of 7.33% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.53%.

Lattice Semiconductor has a consensus price target of $63.07, signalling upside risk potential of 21.52%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $21.52 which suggests that it could fall by -5.62%. Given that Lattice Semiconductor has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Lattice Semiconductor is more attractive than Intel.

Lattice Semiconductor has a beta of 1.522, which suggesting that the stock is 52.162% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.352%.

Lattice Semiconductor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intel offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Lattice Semiconductor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend.

Lattice Semiconductor quarterly revenues are $120.2M, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $12.7B. Lattice Semiconductor's net income of $5M is higher than Intel's net income of -$821M. Notably, Lattice Semiconductor's price-to-earnings ratio is 140.27x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lattice Semiconductor is 14.68x versus 1.85x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 4.18% compared to Lattice Semiconductor's net margin of 9.39%. Lattice Semiconductor's return on equity of 7.33% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -3.57%.

Lattice Semiconductor has a consensus price target of $63.07, signalling upside risk potential of 21.52%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $90.27 which suggests that it could grow by 25.36%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Lattice Semiconductor, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Lattice Semiconductor.

Lattice Semiconductor has a beta of 1.522, which suggesting that the stock is 52.162% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.814, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.355%.

Lattice Semiconductor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Lattice Semiconductor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend.

Lattice Semiconductor quarterly revenues are $120.2M, which are smaller than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Lattice Semiconductor's net income of $5M is lower than Marvell Technology's net income of $177.9M. Notably, Lattice Semiconductor's price-to-earnings ratio is 140.27x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lattice Semiconductor is 14.68x versus 9.62x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 4.18% compared to Lattice Semiconductor's net margin of 42.61%. Lattice Semiconductor's return on equity of 7.33% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12%.

Lattice Semiconductor has a consensus price target of $63.07, signalling upside risk potential of 21.52%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $179.06 which suggests that it could grow by 3.5%. Given that Lattice Semiconductor has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Lattice Semiconductor is more attractive than NVIDIA.

Lattice Semiconductor has a beta of 1.522, which suggesting that the stock is 52.162% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.014%.

Lattice Semiconductor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Lattice Semiconductor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lattice Semiconductor quarterly revenues are $120.2M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $44.1B. Lattice Semiconductor's net income of $5M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B. Notably, Lattice Semiconductor's price-to-earnings ratio is 140.27x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 55.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lattice Semiconductor is 14.68x versus 28.81x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.