GTX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aptiv PLC has a net margin of 7.06% compared to Garrett Motion's net margin of -0.23%. Garrett Motion's return on equity of -- beat Aptiv PLC's return on equity of 15.36%.

Garrett Motion has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.75%. On the other hand Aptiv PLC has an analysts' consensus of $78.55 which suggests that it could grow by 12%. Given that Garrett Motion has higher upside potential than Aptiv PLC, analysts believe Garrett Motion is more attractive than Aptiv PLC.

Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.006, which suggesting that the stock is 99.369% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aptiv PLC has a beta of 1.459, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.874%.

Garrett Motion has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. Aptiv PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Garrett Motion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aptiv PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Garrett Motion quarterly revenues are $878M, which are smaller than Aptiv PLC quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Garrett Motion's net income of $62M is higher than Aptiv PLC's net income of -$11M. Notably, Garrett Motion's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.14x while Aptiv PLC's PE ratio is 11.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garrett Motion is 0.74x versus 0.88x for Aptiv PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dana has a net margin of 7.06% compared to Garrett Motion's net margin of 1.06%. Garrett Motion's return on equity of -- beat Dana's return on equity of -2.06%.

Garrett Motion has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.75%. On the other hand Dana has an analysts' consensus of $22.57 which suggests that it could grow by 33.32%. Given that Dana has higher upside potential than Garrett Motion, analysts believe Dana is more attractive than Garrett Motion.

Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.006, which suggesting that the stock is 99.369% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dana has a beta of 2.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.299%.

Garrett Motion has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. Dana offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Garrett Motion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dana pays out -101.75% of its earnings as a dividend.

Garrett Motion quarterly revenues are $878M, which are smaller than Dana quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Garrett Motion's net income of $62M is higher than Dana's net income of $25M. Notably, Garrett Motion's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.14x while Dana's PE ratio is 147.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garrett Motion is 0.74x versus 0.25x for Dana. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OmniTek Engineering has a net margin of 7.06% compared to Garrett Motion's net margin of -7.41%. Garrett Motion's return on equity of -- beat OmniTek Engineering's return on equity of --.

Garrett Motion has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.75%. On the other hand OmniTek Engineering has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9159.26%. Given that OmniTek Engineering has higher upside potential than Garrett Motion, analysts believe OmniTek Engineering is more attractive than Garrett Motion.

Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.006, which suggesting that the stock is 99.369% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OmniTek Engineering has a beta of -0.130, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.023%.

Garrett Motion has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. OmniTek Engineering offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Garrett Motion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. OmniTek Engineering pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Garrett Motion quarterly revenues are $878M, which are larger than OmniTek Engineering quarterly revenues of $359.8K. Garrett Motion's net income of $62M is higher than OmniTek Engineering's net income of -$26.7K. Notably, Garrett Motion's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.14x while OmniTek Engineering's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garrett Motion is 0.74x versus 0.26x for OmniTek Engineering. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strattec Security has a net margin of 7.06% compared to Garrett Motion's net margin of 3.75%. Garrett Motion's return on equity of -- beat Strattec Security's return on equity of 8.82%.

Garrett Motion has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.75%. On the other hand Strattec Security has an analysts' consensus of $66.50 which suggests that it could grow by 5.98%. Given that Garrett Motion has higher upside potential than Strattec Security, analysts believe Garrett Motion is more attractive than Strattec Security.

Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.006, which suggesting that the stock is 99.369% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strattec Security has a beta of 1.389, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.917%.

Garrett Motion has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. Strattec Security offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Garrett Motion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strattec Security pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Garrett Motion quarterly revenues are $878M, which are larger than Strattec Security quarterly revenues of $144.1M. Garrett Motion's net income of $62M is higher than Strattec Security's net income of $5.4M. Notably, Garrett Motion's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.14x while Strattec Security's PE ratio is 12.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garrett Motion is 0.74x versus 0.46x for Strattec Security. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.