GREE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coinbase Global has a net margin of -28.92% compared to Greenidge Generation Holdings's net margin of 3.23%. Greenidge Generation Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 15.99%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 112.77%. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $309.19 which suggests that it could fall by -22.35%. Given that Greenidge Generation Holdings has higher upside potential than Coinbase Global, analysts believe Greenidge Generation Holdings is more attractive than Coinbase Global.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a beta of 3.310, which suggesting that the stock is 230.976% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenidge Generation Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenidge Generation Holdings quarterly revenues are $19.2M, which are smaller than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $2B. Greenidge Generation Holdings's net income of -$5.6M is lower than Coinbase Global's net income of $65.6M. Notably, Greenidge Generation Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 74.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenidge Generation Holdings is 0.37x versus 15.48x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MARA Holdings has a net margin of -28.92% compared to Greenidge Generation Holdings's net margin of -249.29%. Greenidge Generation Holdings's return on equity of -- beat MARA Holdings's return on equity of -10.39%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 112.77%. On the other hand MARA Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $20.35 which suggests that it could grow by 4.66%. Given that Greenidge Generation Holdings has higher upside potential than MARA Holdings, analysts believe Greenidge Generation Holdings is more attractive than MARA Holdings.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a beta of 3.310, which suggesting that the stock is 230.976% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings has a beta of 6.528, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 552.783%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MARA Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenidge Generation Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenidge Generation Holdings quarterly revenues are $19.2M, which are smaller than MARA Holdings quarterly revenues of $213.9M. Greenidge Generation Holdings's net income of -$5.6M is higher than MARA Holdings's net income of -$533.2M. Notably, Greenidge Generation Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MARA Holdings's PE ratio is 10.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenidge Generation Holdings is 0.37x versus 9.08x for MARA Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -28.92% compared to Greenidge Generation Holdings's net margin of -183.64%. Greenidge Generation Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of -14.35%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 112.77%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $16.27 which suggests that it could grow by 29.41%. Given that Greenidge Generation Holdings has higher upside potential than Riot Platforms, analysts believe Greenidge Generation Holdings is more attractive than Riot Platforms.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a beta of 3.310, which suggesting that the stock is 230.976% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.574, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 357.4%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenidge Generation Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenidge Generation Holdings quarterly revenues are $19.2M, which are smaller than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $161.4M. Greenidge Generation Holdings's net income of -$5.6M is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of -$296.4M. Notably, Greenidge Generation Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 24.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenidge Generation Holdings is 0.37x versus 8.39x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TeraWulf has a net margin of -28.92% compared to Greenidge Generation Holdings's net margin of -178.52%. Greenidge Generation Holdings's return on equity of -- beat TeraWulf's return on equity of -42.95%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 112.77%. On the other hand TeraWulf has an analysts' consensus of $6.86 which suggests that it could grow by 30.74%. Given that Greenidge Generation Holdings has higher upside potential than TeraWulf, analysts believe Greenidge Generation Holdings is more attractive than TeraWulf.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a beta of 3.310, which suggesting that the stock is 230.976% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TeraWulf has a beta of 3.106, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 210.621%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TeraWulf offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenidge Generation Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TeraWulf pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenidge Generation Holdings quarterly revenues are $19.2M, which are smaller than TeraWulf quarterly revenues of $34.4M. Greenidge Generation Holdings's net income of -$5.6M is higher than TeraWulf's net income of -$61.4M. Notably, Greenidge Generation Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TeraWulf's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenidge Generation Holdings is 0.37x versus 14.88x for TeraWulf. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.