RIOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleanspark has a net margin of -183.64% compared to Riot Platforms's net margin of -76.38%. Riot Platforms's return on equity of -14.35% beat Cleanspark's return on equity of -11.15%.

Riot Platforms has a consensus price target of $16.27, signalling upside risk potential of 29.41%. On the other hand Cleanspark has an analysts' consensus of $19.20 which suggests that it could grow by 52.75%. Given that Cleanspark has higher upside potential than Riot Platforms, analysts believe Cleanspark is more attractive than Riot Platforms.

Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.574, which suggesting that the stock is 357.4% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleanspark has a beta of 4.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 323.556%.

Riot Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cleanspark offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Riot Platforms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cleanspark pays out -2.35% of its earnings as a dividend.

Riot Platforms quarterly revenues are $161.4M, which are smaller than Cleanspark quarterly revenues of $181.7M. Riot Platforms's net income of -$296.4M is lower than Cleanspark's net income of -$138.8M. Notably, Riot Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.28x while Cleanspark's PE ratio is 78.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riot Platforms is 8.39x versus 6.15x for Cleanspark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hut 8 has a net margin of -183.64% compared to Riot Platforms's net margin of 44.79%. Riot Platforms's return on equity of -14.35% beat Hut 8's return on equity of -6.47%.

Riot Platforms has a consensus price target of $16.27, signalling upside risk potential of 29.41%. On the other hand Hut 8 has an analysts' consensus of $25.75 which suggests that it could grow by 15.78%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than Hut 8, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than Hut 8.

Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.574, which suggesting that the stock is 357.4% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hut 8 has a beta of 3.930, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 293.014%.

Riot Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hut 8 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Riot Platforms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hut 8 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Riot Platforms quarterly revenues are $161.4M, which are larger than Hut 8 quarterly revenues of -$90.6M. Riot Platforms's net income of -$296.4M is lower than Hut 8's net income of -$133.9M. Notably, Riot Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.28x while Hut 8's PE ratio is 4.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riot Platforms is 8.39x versus 8.72x for Hut 8. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MARA Holdings has a net margin of -183.64% compared to Riot Platforms's net margin of -249.29%. Riot Platforms's return on equity of -14.35% beat MARA Holdings's return on equity of -10.39%.

Riot Platforms has a consensus price target of $16.27, signalling upside risk potential of 29.41%. On the other hand MARA Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $20.35 which suggests that it could grow by 4.66%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than MARA Holdings, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than MARA Holdings.

Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.574, which suggesting that the stock is 357.4% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings has a beta of 6.528, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 552.783%.

Riot Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MARA Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Riot Platforms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Riot Platforms quarterly revenues are $161.4M, which are smaller than MARA Holdings quarterly revenues of $213.9M. Riot Platforms's net income of -$296.4M is higher than MARA Holdings's net income of -$533.2M. Notably, Riot Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.28x while MARA Holdings's PE ratio is 10.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riot Platforms is 8.39x versus 9.08x for MARA Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TeraWulf has a net margin of -183.64% compared to Riot Platforms's net margin of -178.52%. Riot Platforms's return on equity of -14.35% beat TeraWulf's return on equity of -42.95%.

Riot Platforms has a consensus price target of $16.27, signalling upside risk potential of 29.41%. On the other hand TeraWulf has an analysts' consensus of $6.86 which suggests that it could grow by 30.74%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than Riot Platforms, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than Riot Platforms.

Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.574, which suggesting that the stock is 357.4% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TeraWulf has a beta of 3.106, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 210.621%.

Riot Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TeraWulf offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Riot Platforms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TeraWulf pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Riot Platforms quarterly revenues are $161.4M, which are larger than TeraWulf quarterly revenues of $34.4M. Riot Platforms's net income of -$296.4M is lower than TeraWulf's net income of -$61.4M. Notably, Riot Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.28x while TeraWulf's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riot Platforms is 8.39x versus 14.88x for TeraWulf. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.