EFSI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Orange County Bancorp has a net margin of -162.83% compared to Eagle Financial Services's net margin of 31.13%. Eagle Financial Services's return on equity of 4.6% beat Orange County Bancorp's return on equity of 14.74%.

Eagle Financial Services has a consensus price target of $38.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.56%. On the other hand Orange County Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $29.83 which suggests that it could grow by 6.89%. Given that Eagle Financial Services has higher upside potential than Orange County Bancorp, analysts believe Eagle Financial Services is more attractive than Orange County Bancorp.

Eagle Financial Services has a beta of 0.267, which suggesting that the stock is 73.309% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orange County Bancorp has a beta of 0.499, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.095%.

Eagle Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. Orange County Bancorp offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Eagle Financial Services pays 28.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Orange County Bancorp pays out 19.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eagle Financial Services quarterly revenues are $4.3M, which are smaller than Orange County Bancorp quarterly revenues of $28M. Eagle Financial Services's net income of -$7M is lower than Orange County Bancorp's net income of $8.7M. Notably, Eagle Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.96x while Orange County Bancorp's PE ratio is 11.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eagle Financial Services is 2.29x versus 2.86x for Orange County Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OptimumBank Holdings has a net margin of -162.83% compared to Eagle Financial Services's net margin of 36.31%. Eagle Financial Services's return on equity of 4.6% beat OptimumBank Holdings's return on equity of 15.42%.

Eagle Financial Services has a consensus price target of $38.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.56%. On the other hand OptimumBank Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.87%. Given that Eagle Financial Services has higher upside potential than OptimumBank Holdings, analysts believe Eagle Financial Services is more attractive than OptimumBank Holdings.

Eagle Financial Services has a beta of 0.267, which suggesting that the stock is 73.309% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OptimumBank Holdings has a beta of 0.473, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.678%.

Eagle Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. OptimumBank Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eagle Financial Services pays 28.02% of its earnings as a dividend. OptimumBank Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eagle Financial Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eagle Financial Services quarterly revenues are $4.3M, which are smaller than OptimumBank Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.7M. Eagle Financial Services's net income of -$7M is lower than OptimumBank Holdings's net income of $3.9M. Notably, Eagle Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.96x while OptimumBank Holdings's PE ratio is 3.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eagle Financial Services is 2.29x versus 1.21x for OptimumBank Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of -162.83% compared to Eagle Financial Services's net margin of 32.4%. Eagle Financial Services's return on equity of 4.6% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.97%.

Eagle Financial Services has a consensus price target of $38.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.56%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $172.67 which suggests that it could grow by 1.08%. Given that Eagle Financial Services has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Eagle Financial Services is more attractive than Park National.

Eagle Financial Services has a beta of 0.267, which suggesting that the stock is 73.309% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.821, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.866%.

Eagle Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. Park National offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. Eagle Financial Services pays 28.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eagle Financial Services quarterly revenues are $4.3M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $130.1M. Eagle Financial Services's net income of -$7M is lower than Park National's net income of $42.2M. Notably, Eagle Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.96x while Park National's PE ratio is 17.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eagle Financial Services is 2.29x versus 5.25x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of -162.83% compared to Eagle Financial Services's net margin of 24.09%. Eagle Financial Services's return on equity of 4.6% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.46%.

Eagle Financial Services has a consensus price target of $38.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.56%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $72.50 which suggests that it could grow by 11.5%. Given that Eagle Financial Services has higher upside potential than Tompkins Financial, analysts believe Eagle Financial Services is more attractive than Tompkins Financial.

Eagle Financial Services has a beta of 0.267, which suggesting that the stock is 73.309% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.793%.

Eagle Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Eagle Financial Services pays 28.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eagle Financial Services quarterly revenues are $4.3M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $81.7M. Eagle Financial Services's net income of -$7M is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Eagle Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.96x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 12.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eagle Financial Services is 2.29x versus 3.04x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.