CPHC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Las Vegas Sands has a net margin of -2.28% compared to Canterbury Park Holding's net margin of 12.3%. Canterbury Park Holding's return on equity of 0.97% beat Las Vegas Sands's return on equity of 36.71%.

Canterbury Park Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Las Vegas Sands has an analysts' consensus of $52.51 which suggests that it could grow by 6.9%. Given that Las Vegas Sands has higher upside potential than Canterbury Park Holding, analysts believe Las Vegas Sands is more attractive than Canterbury Park Holding.

Canterbury Park Holding has a beta of -0.372, which suggesting that the stock is 137.21% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 1.033, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.297%.

Canterbury Park Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.53%. Las Vegas Sands offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Canterbury Park Holding pays 66.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Las Vegas Sands pays out 40.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Canterbury Park Holding quarterly revenues are $13.1M, which are smaller than Las Vegas Sands quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Canterbury Park Holding's net income of -$299.2K is lower than Las Vegas Sands's net income of $352M. Notably, Canterbury Park Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 114.19x while Las Vegas Sands's PE ratio is 27.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canterbury Park Holding is 1.52x versus 3.19x for Las Vegas Sands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monarch Casino & Resort has a net margin of -2.28% compared to Canterbury Park Holding's net margin of 15.84%. Canterbury Park Holding's return on equity of 0.97% beat Monarch Casino & Resort's return on equity of 14.44%.

Canterbury Park Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Monarch Casino & Resort has an analysts' consensus of $93.60 which suggests that it could grow by 4.63%. Given that Monarch Casino & Resort has higher upside potential than Canterbury Park Holding, analysts believe Monarch Casino & Resort is more attractive than Canterbury Park Holding.

Canterbury Park Holding has a beta of -0.372, which suggesting that the stock is 137.21% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monarch Casino & Resort has a beta of 1.558, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.807%.

Canterbury Park Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.53%. Monarch Casino & Resort offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Canterbury Park Holding pays 66.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Monarch Casino & Resort pays out 30.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Canterbury Park Holding quarterly revenues are $13.1M, which are smaller than Monarch Casino & Resort quarterly revenues of $125.4M. Canterbury Park Holding's net income of -$299.2K is lower than Monarch Casino & Resort's net income of $19.9M. Notably, Canterbury Park Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 114.19x while Monarch Casino & Resort's PE ratio is 17.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canterbury Park Holding is 1.52x versus 3.13x for Monarch Casino & Resort. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PENN Entertainment has a net margin of -2.28% compared to Canterbury Park Holding's net margin of 6.69%. Canterbury Park Holding's return on equity of 0.97% beat PENN Entertainment's return on equity of -2.84%.

Canterbury Park Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PENN Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $21.94 which suggests that it could grow by 24.9%. Given that PENN Entertainment has higher upside potential than Canterbury Park Holding, analysts believe PENN Entertainment is more attractive than Canterbury Park Holding.

Canterbury Park Holding has a beta of -0.372, which suggesting that the stock is 137.21% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PENN Entertainment has a beta of 1.609, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.92%.

Canterbury Park Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.53%. PENN Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Canterbury Park Holding pays 66.53% of its earnings as a dividend. PENN Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canterbury Park Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Canterbury Park Holding quarterly revenues are $13.1M, which are smaller than PENN Entertainment quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Canterbury Park Holding's net income of -$299.2K is lower than PENN Entertainment's net income of $111.8M. Notably, Canterbury Park Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 114.19x while PENN Entertainment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canterbury Park Holding is 1.52x versus 0.41x for PENN Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wynn Resorts has a net margin of -2.28% compared to Canterbury Park Holding's net margin of 4.28%. Canterbury Park Holding's return on equity of 0.97% beat Wynn Resorts's return on equity of --.

Canterbury Park Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wynn Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $114.36 which suggests that it could grow by 4.11%. Given that Wynn Resorts has higher upside potential than Canterbury Park Holding, analysts believe Wynn Resorts is more attractive than Canterbury Park Holding.

Canterbury Park Holding has a beta of -0.372, which suggesting that the stock is 137.21% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wynn Resorts has a beta of 1.368, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.839%.

Canterbury Park Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.53%. Wynn Resorts offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Canterbury Park Holding pays 66.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Wynn Resorts pays out 27.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Canterbury Park Holding quarterly revenues are $13.1M, which are smaller than Wynn Resorts quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Canterbury Park Holding's net income of -$299.2K is lower than Wynn Resorts's net income of $72.7M. Notably, Canterbury Park Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 114.19x while Wynn Resorts's PE ratio is 30.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canterbury Park Holding is 1.52x versus 1.72x for Wynn Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.