CCEC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Euroseas has a net margin of 73.79% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net margin of 65.52%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's return on equity of 18.68% beat Euroseas's return on equity of 38.46%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus price target of $23.40, signalling downside risk potential of -4.26%. On the other hand Euroseas has an analysts' consensus of $58.33 which suggests that it could grow by 19.86%. Given that Euroseas has higher upside potential than Capital Clean Energy Carriers, analysts believe Euroseas is more attractive than Capital Clean Energy Carriers.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.413, which suggesting that the stock is 58.673% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euroseas has a beta of 0.798, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.178%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.46%. Euroseas offers a yield of 4.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays 17.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Euroseas pays out 14.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers quarterly revenues are $109.4M, which are larger than Euroseas quarterly revenues of $56.3M. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net income of $80.7M is higher than Euroseas's net income of $36.9M. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.41x while Euroseas's PE ratio is 2.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers is 3.12x versus 1.53x for Euroseas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Ship Lease has a net margin of 73.79% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net margin of 65.72%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's return on equity of 18.68% beat Global Ship Lease's return on equity of 27.48%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus price target of $23.40, signalling downside risk potential of -4.26%. On the other hand Global Ship Lease has an analysts' consensus of $32.33 which suggests that it could grow by 16.85%. Given that Global Ship Lease has higher upside potential than Capital Clean Energy Carriers, analysts believe Global Ship Lease is more attractive than Capital Clean Energy Carriers.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.413, which suggesting that the stock is 58.673% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Ship Lease has a beta of 1.187, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.73%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.46%. Global Ship Lease offers a yield of 6.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays 17.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Ship Lease pays out 19.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers quarterly revenues are $109.4M, which are smaller than Global Ship Lease quarterly revenues of $187.8M. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net income of $80.7M is lower than Global Ship Lease's net income of $123.4M. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.41x while Global Ship Lease's PE ratio is 2.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers is 3.12x versus 1.37x for Global Ship Lease. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Navios Maritime Partners LP has a net margin of 73.79% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net margin of 13.72%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's return on equity of 18.68% beat Navios Maritime Partners LP's return on equity of 11.16%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus price target of $23.40, signalling downside risk potential of -4.26%. On the other hand Navios Maritime Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of $65.50 which suggests that it could grow by 66.54%. Given that Navios Maritime Partners LP has higher upside potential than Capital Clean Energy Carriers, analysts believe Navios Maritime Partners LP is more attractive than Capital Clean Energy Carriers.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.413, which suggesting that the stock is 58.673% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Navios Maritime Partners LP has a beta of 1.347, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.651%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.46%. Navios Maritime Partners LP offers a yield of 0.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays 17.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Navios Maritime Partners LP pays out 1.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers quarterly revenues are $109.4M, which are smaller than Navios Maritime Partners LP quarterly revenues of $304.1M. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net income of $80.7M is higher than Navios Maritime Partners LP's net income of $41.7M. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.41x while Navios Maritime Partners LP's PE ratio is 3.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers is 3.12x versus 0.89x for Navios Maritime Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Star Bulk Carriers has a net margin of 73.79% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net margin of 0.2%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's return on equity of 18.68% beat Star Bulk Carriers's return on equity of 10.93%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus price target of $23.40, signalling downside risk potential of -4.26%. On the other hand Star Bulk Carriers has an analysts' consensus of $20.22 which suggests that it could grow by 11.04%. Given that Star Bulk Carriers has higher upside potential than Capital Clean Energy Carriers, analysts believe Star Bulk Carriers is more attractive than Capital Clean Energy Carriers.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.413, which suggesting that the stock is 58.673% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Star Bulk Carriers has a beta of 0.947, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.262%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.46%. Star Bulk Carriers offers a yield of 7.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays 17.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Star Bulk Carriers pays out 90.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers quarterly revenues are $109.4M, which are smaller than Star Bulk Carriers quarterly revenues of $230.7M. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net income of $80.7M is higher than Star Bulk Carriers's net income of $462K. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.41x while Star Bulk Carriers's PE ratio is 9.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers is 3.12x versus 1.72x for Star Bulk Carriers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.