BEEM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AXT has a net margin of -245.46% compared to Beam Global's net margin of -45.45%. Beam Global's return on equity of -58.06% beat AXT's return on equity of -7.08%.

Beam Global has a consensus price target of $3.45, signalling upside risk potential of 68.29%. On the other hand AXT has an analysts' consensus of $3.96 which suggests that it could grow by 65.69%. Given that Beam Global has higher upside potential than AXT, analysts believe Beam Global is more attractive than AXT.

Beam Global has a beta of 2.177, which suggesting that the stock is 117.733% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AXT has a beta of 2.072, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.197%.

Beam Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AXT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Beam Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AXT pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Beam Global quarterly revenues are $6.3M, which are smaller than AXT quarterly revenues of $19.4M. Beam Global's net income of -$15.5M is lower than AXT's net income of -$8.8M. Notably, Beam Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AXT's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Beam Global is 0.74x versus 1.08x for AXT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Entegris has a net margin of -245.46% compared to Beam Global's net margin of 8.14%. Beam Global's return on equity of -58.06% beat Entegris's return on equity of 8.64%.

Beam Global has a consensus price target of $3.45, signalling upside risk potential of 68.29%. On the other hand Entegris has an analysts' consensus of $98.86 which suggests that it could grow by 13%. Given that Beam Global has higher upside potential than Entegris, analysts believe Beam Global is more attractive than Entegris.

Beam Global has a beta of 2.177, which suggesting that the stock is 117.733% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Entegris has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.526%.

Beam Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Entegris offers a yield of 0.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Beam Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Entegris pays out 20.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Entegris's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Beam Global quarterly revenues are $6.3M, which are smaller than Entegris quarterly revenues of $773.2M. Beam Global's net income of -$15.5M is lower than Entegris's net income of $62.9M. Notably, Beam Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Entegris's PE ratio is 42.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Beam Global is 0.74x versus 4.10x for Entegris. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FormFactor has a net margin of -245.46% compared to Beam Global's net margin of 3.74%. Beam Global's return on equity of -58.06% beat FormFactor's return on equity of 5.72%.

Beam Global has a consensus price target of $3.45, signalling upside risk potential of 68.29%. On the other hand FormFactor has an analysts' consensus of $37.38 which suggests that it could grow by 6.48%. Given that Beam Global has higher upside potential than FormFactor, analysts believe Beam Global is more attractive than FormFactor.

Beam Global has a beta of 2.177, which suggesting that the stock is 117.733% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FormFactor has a beta of 1.147, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.738%.

Beam Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FormFactor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Beam Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FormFactor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Beam Global quarterly revenues are $6.3M, which are smaller than FormFactor quarterly revenues of $171.4M. Beam Global's net income of -$15.5M is lower than FormFactor's net income of $6.4M. Notably, Beam Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FormFactor's PE ratio is 50.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Beam Global is 0.74x versus 3.59x for FormFactor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

inTest has a net margin of -245.46% compared to Beam Global's net margin of -8.74%. Beam Global's return on equity of -58.06% beat inTest's return on equity of -0.1%.

Beam Global has a consensus price target of $3.45, signalling upside risk potential of 68.29%. On the other hand inTest has an analysts' consensus of $10.50 which suggests that it could grow by 48.94%. Given that Beam Global has higher upside potential than inTest, analysts believe Beam Global is more attractive than inTest.

Beam Global has a beta of 2.177, which suggesting that the stock is 117.733% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison inTest has a beta of 1.655, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.54%.

Beam Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. inTest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Beam Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. inTest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Beam Global quarterly revenues are $6.3M, which are smaller than inTest quarterly revenues of $26.6M. Beam Global's net income of -$15.5M is lower than inTest's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Beam Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while inTest's PE ratio is 25.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Beam Global is 0.74x versus 0.68x for inTest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.