ASML Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Applied Materials has a net margin of 30.42% compared to ASML Holding NV's net margin of 30.1%. ASML Holding NV's return on equity of 53.71% beat Applied Materials's return on equity of 36.09%.

ASML Holding NV has a consensus price target of $875.07, signalling upside risk potential of 15.99%. On the other hand Applied Materials has an analysts' consensus of $198.0359 which suggests that it could grow by 1.66%. Given that ASML Holding NV has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, analysts believe ASML Holding NV is more attractive than Applied Materials.

ASML Holding NV has a beta of 1.734, which suggesting that the stock is 73.388% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Applied Materials has a beta of 1.694, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.389%.

ASML Holding NV has a quarterly dividend of $2.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. Applied Materials offers a yield of 0.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. ASML Holding NV pays 32.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASML Holding NV quarterly revenues are $8.1B, which are larger than Applied Materials quarterly revenues of $7.1B. ASML Holding NV's net income of $2.5B is higher than Applied Materials's net income of $2.1B. Notably, ASML Holding NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.79x while Applied Materials's PE ratio is 23.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASML Holding NV is 9.00x versus 5.71x for Applied Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 30.42% compared to ASML Holding NV's net margin of 9.53%. ASML Holding NV's return on equity of 53.71% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 3.91%.

ASML Holding NV has a consensus price target of $875.07, signalling upside risk potential of 15.99%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $143.78 which suggests that it could fall by -10.18%. Given that ASML Holding NV has higher upside potential than Advanced Micro Devices, analysts believe ASML Holding NV is more attractive than Advanced Micro Devices.

ASML Holding NV has a beta of 1.734, which suggesting that the stock is 73.388% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 2.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.692%.

ASML Holding NV has a quarterly dividend of $2.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ASML Holding NV pays 32.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ASML Holding NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASML Holding NV quarterly revenues are $8.1B, which are larger than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.4B. ASML Holding NV's net income of $2.5B is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $709M. Notably, ASML Holding NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.79x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 117.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASML Holding NV is 9.00x versus 9.42x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 30.42% compared to ASML Holding NV's net margin of -6.48%. ASML Holding NV's return on equity of 53.71% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.53%.

ASML Holding NV has a consensus price target of $875.07, signalling upside risk potential of 15.99%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $21.52 which suggests that it could fall by -5.16%. Given that ASML Holding NV has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe ASML Holding NV is more attractive than Intel.

ASML Holding NV has a beta of 1.734, which suggesting that the stock is 73.388% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.352%.

ASML Holding NV has a quarterly dividend of $2.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. Intel offers a yield of 2.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. ASML Holding NV pays 32.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. ASML Holding NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASML Holding NV quarterly revenues are $8.1B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $12.7B. ASML Holding NV's net income of $2.5B is higher than Intel's net income of -$821M. Notably, ASML Holding NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.79x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASML Holding NV is 9.00x versus 1.84x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lam Research has a net margin of 30.42% compared to ASML Holding NV's net margin of 28.19%. ASML Holding NV's return on equity of 53.71% beat Lam Research's return on equity of 53.73%.

ASML Holding NV has a consensus price target of $875.07, signalling upside risk potential of 15.99%. On the other hand Lam Research has an analysts' consensus of $96.22 which suggests that it could fall by -4.14%. Given that ASML Holding NV has higher upside potential than Lam Research, analysts believe ASML Holding NV is more attractive than Lam Research.

ASML Holding NV has a beta of 1.734, which suggesting that the stock is 73.388% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lam Research has a beta of 1.683, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.296%.

ASML Holding NV has a quarterly dividend of $2.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. Lam Research offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. ASML Holding NV pays 32.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research pays out 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASML Holding NV quarterly revenues are $8.1B, which are larger than Lam Research quarterly revenues of $4.7B. ASML Holding NV's net income of $2.5B is higher than Lam Research's net income of $1.3B. Notably, ASML Holding NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.79x while Lam Research's PE ratio is 27.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASML Holding NV is 9.00x versus 7.61x for Lam Research. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.