Financhill
Buy
63

AMAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$193.5500
Seasonality move :
-0.66%
Day range:
$189.7500 - $195.1600
52-week range:
$123.7365 - $233.3200
Dividend yield:
0.85%
P/E ratio:
23.70x
P/S ratio:
5.71x
P/B ratio:
8.25x
Volume:
9.4M
Avg. volume:
6.8M
1-year change:
-20.76%
Market cap:
$156.3B
Revenue:
$27.2B
EPS (TTM):
$8.22

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
AMAT
Applied Materials
$7.1B $2.31 6.41% 14.88% $198.0359
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices
$7.4B $0.48 19.25% 136.66% $143.78
INTC
Intel
$11.9B $0.01 -7.24% -81.02% $21.52
KLAC
KLA
$3.1B $8.55 19.7% 38.17% $830.45
MRVL
Marvell Technology
$1.9B $0.61 57.92% -- $90.27
MU
Micron Technology
$8.8B $1.59 38.47% 218.01% $148.90
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
AMAT
Applied Materials
$194.8100 $198.0359 $156.3B 23.70x $0.46 0.85% 5.71x
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices
$160.08 $143.78 $259.6B 117.71x $0.00 0% 9.42x
INTC
Intel
$22.69 $21.52 $99B 95.83x $0.13 2.2% 1.84x
KLAC
KLA
$933.49 $830.45 $123.4B 33.93x $1.90 0.72% 10.86x
MRVL
Marvell Technology
$70.85 $90.27 $61.1B -- $0.06 0.34% 9.46x
MU
Micron Technology
$116.43 $148.90 $130.3B 20.98x $0.12 0.4% 3.90x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
AMAT
Applied Materials
24.82% 1.467 5.48% 1.62x
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices
6.71% 1.818 2.5% 1.77x
INTC
Intel
33.46% 0.975 47.44% 0.75x
KLAC
KLA
59.5% 1.348 6.54% 1.62x
MRVL
Marvell Technology
24.12% 2.853 8.39% 0.69x
MU
Micron Technology
19.68% 2.492 11.76% 1.80x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
AMAT
Applied Materials
$3.5B $2.2B 27.2% 36.09% 33.66% $1.1B
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices
$3.7B $806M 3.75% 3.91% 11.36% $727M
INTC
Intel
$4.7B -$145M -11.95% -17.53% -2.27% -$4.4B
KLAC
KLA
$1.9B $1.3B 37.5% 104.91% 43.63% $987.2M
MRVL
Marvell Technology
$952.4M $258.3M -2.75% -3.57% 14.28% $213M
MU
Micron Technology
$3.5B $2.2B 10.61% 13.22% 24.04% $1.7B

Applied Materials vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns AMAT or AMD?

    Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 30.1% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 9.53%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 36.09% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 3.91%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    49.09% $2.63 $25.2B
    AMD
    Advanced Micro Devices
    50.23% $0.44 $62B
  • What do Analysts Say About AMAT or AMD?

    Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $198.0359, signalling upside risk potential of 1.66%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $143.78 which suggests that it could fall by -10.18%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than Advanced Micro Devices, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than Advanced Micro Devices.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    20 13 0
    AMD
    Advanced Micro Devices
    29 16 0
  • Is AMAT or AMD More Risky?

    Applied Materials has a beta of 1.694, which suggesting that the stock is 69.389% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 2.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.692%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMAT or AMD?

    Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AMAT or AMD?

    Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are smaller than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Applied Materials's net income of $2.1B is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $709M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.70x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 117.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 5.71x versus 9.42x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    5.71x 23.70x $7.1B $2.1B
    AMD
    Advanced Micro Devices
    9.42x 117.71x $7.4B $709M
  • Which has Higher Returns AMAT or INTC?

    Intel has a net margin of 30.1% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of -6.48%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 36.09% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.53%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    49.09% $2.63 $25.2B
    INTC
    Intel
    36.88% -$0.19 $156.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About AMAT or INTC?

    Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $198.0359, signalling upside risk potential of 1.66%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $21.52 which suggests that it could fall by -5.16%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than Intel.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    20 13 0
    INTC
    Intel
    2 39 2
  • Is AMAT or INTC More Risky?

    Applied Materials has a beta of 1.694, which suggesting that the stock is 69.389% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.352%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMAT or INTC?

    Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Intel offers a yield of 2.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AMAT or INTC?

    Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $12.7B. Applied Materials's net income of $2.1B is higher than Intel's net income of -$821M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.70x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 5.71x versus 1.84x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    5.71x 23.70x $7.1B $2.1B
    INTC
    Intel
    1.84x 95.83x $12.7B -$821M
  • Which has Higher Returns AMAT or KLAC?

    KLA has a net margin of 30.1% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 35.53%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 36.09% beat KLA's return on equity of 104.91%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    49.09% $2.63 $25.2B
    KLAC
    KLA
    61.62% $8.16 $9.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About AMAT or KLAC?

    Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $198.0359, signalling upside risk potential of 1.66%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $830.45 which suggests that it could fall by -11.04%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than KLA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    20 13 0
    KLAC
    KLA
    9 13 0
  • Is AMAT or KLAC More Risky?

    Applied Materials has a beta of 1.694, which suggesting that the stock is 69.389% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.423, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.272%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMAT or KLAC?

    Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. KLA offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AMAT or KLAC?

    Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Applied Materials's net income of $2.1B is higher than KLA's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.70x while KLA's PE ratio is 33.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 5.71x versus 10.86x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    5.71x 23.70x $7.1B $2.1B
    KLAC
    KLA
    10.86x 33.93x $3.1B $1.1B
  • Which has Higher Returns AMAT or MRVL?

    Marvell Technology has a net margin of 30.1% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 9.39%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 36.09% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -3.57%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    49.09% $2.63 $25.2B
    MRVL
    Marvell Technology
    50.25% $0.20 $17.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About AMAT or MRVL?

    Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $198.0359, signalling upside risk potential of 1.66%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $90.27 which suggests that it could grow by 27.41%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Applied Materials.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    20 13 0
    MRVL
    Marvell Technology
    28 7 0
  • Is AMAT or MRVL More Risky?

    Applied Materials has a beta of 1.694, which suggesting that the stock is 69.389% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.814, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.355%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMAT or MRVL?

    Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AMAT or MRVL?

    Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Applied Materials's net income of $2.1B is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $177.9M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.70x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 5.71x versus 9.46x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    5.71x 23.70x $7.1B $2.1B
    MRVL
    Marvell Technology
    9.46x -- $1.9B $177.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns AMAT or MU?

    Micron Technology has a net margin of 30.1% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 20.27%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 36.09% beat Micron Technology's return on equity of 13.22%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    49.09% $2.63 $25.2B
    MU
    Micron Technology
    37.72% $1.68 $63.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About AMAT or MU?

    Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $198.0359, signalling upside risk potential of 1.66%. On the other hand Micron Technology has an analysts' consensus of $148.90 which suggests that it could grow by 27.89%. Given that Micron Technology has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, analysts believe Micron Technology is more attractive than Applied Materials.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    20 13 0
    MU
    Micron Technology
    26 6 0
  • Is AMAT or MU More Risky?

    Applied Materials has a beta of 1.694, which suggesting that the stock is 69.389% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology has a beta of 1.347, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.693%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMAT or MU?

    Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Micron Technology offers a yield of 0.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AMAT or MU?

    Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are smaller than Micron Technology quarterly revenues of $9.3B. Applied Materials's net income of $2.1B is higher than Micron Technology's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.70x while Micron Technology's PE ratio is 20.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 5.71x versus 3.90x for Micron Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    5.71x 23.70x $7.1B $2.1B
    MU
    Micron Technology
    3.90x 20.98x $9.3B $1.9B

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?

Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…

Can Levi Stock Double?
Can Levi Stock Double?

Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…

How High Can SharkNinja Stock Go?
How High Can SharkNinja Stock Go?

If you know popular consumer appliance brands Shark and Ninja,…

Stock Ideas

Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 58x

Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Alerts

Buy
82
SBET alert for Jul 17

SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 7.22% over the past day.

Buy
89
EXOD alert for Jul 17

Exodus Movement [EXOD] is down 0.5% over the past day.

Sell
42
VLCN alert for Jul 17

Volcon [VLCN] is up 202.14% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock