ANSS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk has a net margin of 10.27% compared to Ansys's net margin of 9.31%. Ansys's return on equity of 10.19% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 40.52%.

Ansys has a consensus price target of $353.50, signalling downside risk potential of -9.99%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $340.21 which suggests that it could grow by 17.74%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than Ansys, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than Ansys.

Ansys has a beta of 1.191, which suggesting that the stock is 19.099% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.439, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.944%.

Ansys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ansys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ansys quarterly revenues are $504.9M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Ansys's net income of $51.9M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $152M. Notably, Ansys's price-to-earnings ratio is 58.27x while Autodesk's PE ratio is 61.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ansys is 13.38x versus 9.87x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 10.27% compared to Ansys's net margin of 22.02%. Ansys's return on equity of 10.19% beat Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 24.76%.

Ansys has a consensus price target of $353.50, signalling downside risk potential of -9.99%. On the other hand Cadence Design Systems has an analysts' consensus of $328.11 which suggests that it could grow by 3.17%. Given that Cadence Design Systems has higher upside potential than Ansys, analysts believe Cadence Design Systems is more attractive than Ansys.

Ansys has a beta of 1.191, which suggesting that the stock is 19.099% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 0.988, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.194%.

Ansys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cadence Design Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ansys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cadence Design Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ansys quarterly revenues are $504.9M, which are smaller than Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Ansys's net income of $51.9M is lower than Cadence Design Systems's net income of $273.6M. Notably, Ansys's price-to-earnings ratio is 58.27x while Cadence Design Systems's PE ratio is 80.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ansys is 13.38x versus 17.87x for Cadence Design Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PTC has a net margin of 10.27% compared to Ansys's net margin of 25.56%. Ansys's return on equity of 10.19% beat PTC's return on equity of 13.95%.

Ansys has a consensus price target of $353.50, signalling downside risk potential of -9.99%. On the other hand PTC has an analysts' consensus of $194.32 which suggests that it could grow by 1.09%. Given that PTC has higher upside potential than Ansys, analysts believe PTC is more attractive than Ansys.

Ansys has a beta of 1.191, which suggesting that the stock is 19.099% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PTC has a beta of 1.170, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.029%.

Ansys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PTC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ansys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PTC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ansys quarterly revenues are $504.9M, which are smaller than PTC quarterly revenues of $636.4M. Ansys's net income of $51.9M is lower than PTC's net income of $162.6M. Notably, Ansys's price-to-earnings ratio is 58.27x while PTC's PE ratio is 52.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ansys is 13.38x versus 9.91x for PTC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Synopsys has a net margin of 10.27% compared to Ansys's net margin of 21.53%. Ansys's return on equity of 10.19% beat Synopsys's return on equity of 25.05%.

Ansys has a consensus price target of $353.50, signalling downside risk potential of -9.99%. On the other hand Synopsys has an analysts' consensus of $605.16 which suggests that it could grow by 6.34%. Given that Synopsys has higher upside potential than Ansys, analysts believe Synopsys is more attractive than Ansys.

Ansys has a beta of 1.191, which suggesting that the stock is 19.099% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Synopsys has a beta of 1.124, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.37%.

Ansys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Synopsys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ansys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Synopsys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ansys quarterly revenues are $504.9M, which are smaller than Synopsys quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Ansys's net income of $51.9M is lower than Synopsys's net income of $345.3M. Notably, Ansys's price-to-earnings ratio is 58.27x while Synopsys's PE ratio is 41.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ansys is 13.38x versus 14.28x for Synopsys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.