Financhill
Sell
25

CNQ.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$42.33
Seasonality move :
1.48%
Day range:
$42.16 - $43.05
52-week range:
$34.92 - $52.15
Dividend yield:
5.35%
P/E ratio:
11.86x
P/S ratio:
2.01x
P/B ratio:
2.19x
Volume:
11.2M
Avg. volume:
21.3M
1-year change:
-13.88%
Market cap:
$88.6B
Revenue:
$41.5B
EPS (TTM):
$3.57

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources
$8.8B $0.68 -10.04% -22.12% $51.42
ARX.TO
ARC Resources
$1.4B $0.58 6.72% 45% $34.24
CVE.TO
Cenovus Energy
$10.6B $0.08 -32.4% -64.57% $25.94
IMO.TO
Imperial Oil
$11.7B $1.51 -8.56% -29.87% $102.17
MEG.TO
MEG Energy
$1B $0.23 -33.76% -48.65% $28.63
POU.TO
Paramount Resources
$115M $0.31 -78.22% -47.46% $23.90
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources
$42.33 $51.42 $88.6B 11.86x $0.59 5.35% 2.01x
ARX.TO
ARC Resources
$26.83 $34.24 $15.7B 11.87x $0.19 2.76% 2.67x
CVE.TO
Cenovus Energy
$19.12 $25.94 $34.7B 12.83x $0.20 3.87% 0.60x
IMO.TO
Imperial Oil
$112.17 $102.17 $57.1B 12.02x $0.72 2.35% 1.20x
MEG.TO
MEG Energy
$26.34 $28.63 $6.7B 11.26x $0.10 1.52% 1.27x
POU.TO
Paramount Resources
$21.34 $23.90 $3.1B 2.03x $0.05 5.62% 1.63x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources
30.11% 0.318 18.76% 0.46x
ARX.TO
ARC Resources
11.69% 0.231 6.99% 0.41x
CVE.TO
Cenovus Energy
20.72% 0.759 21.4% 0.84x
IMO.TO
Imperial Oil
12.43% 0.990 6.55% 1.07x
MEG.TO
MEG Energy
15.73% 0.934 13.73% 1.08x
POU.TO
Paramount Resources
-- 0.623 -- 2.53x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources
$3.6B $3.3B 14.23% 19.06% 26.39% $3B
ARX.TO
ARC Resources
$987.6M $581.8M 14.82% 17.27% 30.99% $560.4M
CVE.TO
Cenovus Energy
$3.1B $1.3B 7.57% 9.47% 9.1% $86M
IMO.TO
Imperial Oil
$1.9B $1.6B 17.93% 20.59% 14.2% $1.1B
MEG.TO
MEG Energy
$582M $293M 11.34% 13.57% 22.99% $139M
POU.TO
Paramount Resources
$170.7M $60M 44.77% 45.34% 444.94% -$69M

Canadian Natural Resources vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CNQ.TO or ARX.TO?

    ARC Resources has a net margin of 19.34% compared to Canadian Natural Resources's net margin of 22.54%. Canadian Natural Resources's return on equity of 19.06% beat ARC Resources's return on equity of 17.27%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CNQ.TO
    Canadian Natural Resources
    27.98% $1.17 $57.9B
    ARX.TO
    ARC Resources
    55.01% $0.69 $9.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About CNQ.TO or ARX.TO?

    Canadian Natural Resources has a consensus price target of $51.42, signalling upside risk potential of 19.67%. On the other hand ARC Resources has an analysts' consensus of $34.24 which suggests that it could grow by 27.6%. Given that ARC Resources has higher upside potential than Canadian Natural Resources, analysts believe ARC Resources is more attractive than Canadian Natural Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CNQ.TO
    Canadian Natural Resources
    9 7 0
    ARX.TO
    ARC Resources
    11 0 0
  • Is CNQ.TO or ARX.TO More Risky?

    Canadian Natural Resources has a beta of 1.444, which suggesting that the stock is 44.399% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ARC Resources has a beta of 0.460, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.982%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNQ.TO or ARX.TO?

    Canadian Natural Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.35%. ARC Resources offers a yield of 2.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Canadian Natural Resources pays 72.54% of its earnings as a dividend. ARC Resources pays out 36.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CNQ.TO or ARX.TO?

    Canadian Natural Resources quarterly revenues are $12.7B, which are larger than ARC Resources quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Canadian Natural Resources's net income of $2.5B is higher than ARC Resources's net income of $404.7M. Notably, Canadian Natural Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.86x while ARC Resources's PE ratio is 11.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canadian Natural Resources is 2.01x versus 2.67x for ARC Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CNQ.TO
    Canadian Natural Resources
    2.01x 11.86x $12.7B $2.5B
    ARX.TO
    ARC Resources
    2.67x 11.87x $1.8B $404.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns CNQ.TO or CVE.TO?

    Cenovus Energy has a net margin of 19.34% compared to Canadian Natural Resources's net margin of 6.05%. Canadian Natural Resources's return on equity of 19.06% beat Cenovus Energy's return on equity of 9.47%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CNQ.TO
    Canadian Natural Resources
    27.98% $1.17 $57.9B
    CVE.TO
    Cenovus Energy
    21.89% $0.47 $37.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About CNQ.TO or CVE.TO?

    Canadian Natural Resources has a consensus price target of $51.42, signalling upside risk potential of 19.67%. On the other hand Cenovus Energy has an analysts' consensus of $25.94 which suggests that it could grow by 35.68%. Given that Cenovus Energy has higher upside potential than Canadian Natural Resources, analysts believe Cenovus Energy is more attractive than Canadian Natural Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CNQ.TO
    Canadian Natural Resources
    9 7 0
    CVE.TO
    Cenovus Energy
    9 1 0
  • Is CNQ.TO or CVE.TO More Risky?

    Canadian Natural Resources has a beta of 1.444, which suggesting that the stock is 44.399% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cenovus Energy has a beta of 1.212, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.236%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNQ.TO or CVE.TO?

    Canadian Natural Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.35%. Cenovus Energy offers a yield of 3.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Canadian Natural Resources pays 72.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Cenovus Energy pays out 49.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CNQ.TO or CVE.TO?

    Canadian Natural Resources quarterly revenues are $12.7B, which are smaller than Cenovus Energy quarterly revenues of $14.2B. Canadian Natural Resources's net income of $2.5B is higher than Cenovus Energy's net income of $859M. Notably, Canadian Natural Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.86x while Cenovus Energy's PE ratio is 12.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canadian Natural Resources is 2.01x versus 0.60x for Cenovus Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CNQ.TO
    Canadian Natural Resources
    2.01x 11.86x $12.7B $2.5B
    CVE.TO
    Cenovus Energy
    0.60x 12.83x $14.2B $859M
  • Which has Higher Returns CNQ.TO or IMO.TO?

    Imperial Oil has a net margin of 19.34% compared to Canadian Natural Resources's net margin of 10.85%. Canadian Natural Resources's return on equity of 19.06% beat Imperial Oil's return on equity of 20.59%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CNQ.TO
    Canadian Natural Resources
    27.98% $1.17 $57.9B
    IMO.TO
    Imperial Oil
    16.01% $2.52 $27.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About CNQ.TO or IMO.TO?

    Canadian Natural Resources has a consensus price target of $51.42, signalling upside risk potential of 19.67%. On the other hand Imperial Oil has an analysts' consensus of $102.17 which suggests that it could fall by -8.92%. Given that Canadian Natural Resources has higher upside potential than Imperial Oil, analysts believe Canadian Natural Resources is more attractive than Imperial Oil.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CNQ.TO
    Canadian Natural Resources
    9 7 0
    IMO.TO
    Imperial Oil
    4 10 2
  • Is CNQ.TO or IMO.TO More Risky?

    Canadian Natural Resources has a beta of 1.444, which suggesting that the stock is 44.399% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Imperial Oil has a beta of 1.140, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.989%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNQ.TO or IMO.TO?

    Canadian Natural Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.35%. Imperial Oil offers a yield of 2.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Canadian Natural Resources pays 72.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Oil pays out 25.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CNQ.TO or IMO.TO?

    Canadian Natural Resources quarterly revenues are $12.7B, which are larger than Imperial Oil quarterly revenues of $11.9B. Canadian Natural Resources's net income of $2.5B is higher than Imperial Oil's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Canadian Natural Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.86x while Imperial Oil's PE ratio is 12.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canadian Natural Resources is 2.01x versus 1.20x for Imperial Oil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CNQ.TO
    Canadian Natural Resources
    2.01x 11.86x $12.7B $2.5B
    IMO.TO
    Imperial Oil
    1.20x 12.02x $11.9B $1.3B
  • Which has Higher Returns CNQ.TO or MEG.TO?

    MEG Energy has a net margin of 19.34% compared to Canadian Natural Resources's net margin of 16.61%. Canadian Natural Resources's return on equity of 19.06% beat MEG Energy's return on equity of 13.57%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CNQ.TO
    Canadian Natural Resources
    27.98% $1.17 $57.9B
    MEG.TO
    MEG Energy
    45.83% $0.82 $5.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About CNQ.TO or MEG.TO?

    Canadian Natural Resources has a consensus price target of $51.42, signalling upside risk potential of 19.67%. On the other hand MEG Energy has an analysts' consensus of $28.63 which suggests that it could grow by 8.68%. Given that Canadian Natural Resources has higher upside potential than MEG Energy, analysts believe Canadian Natural Resources is more attractive than MEG Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CNQ.TO
    Canadian Natural Resources
    9 7 0
    MEG.TO
    MEG Energy
    4 7 0
  • Is CNQ.TO or MEG.TO More Risky?

    Canadian Natural Resources has a beta of 1.444, which suggesting that the stock is 44.399% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MEG Energy has a beta of 1.576, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.626%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNQ.TO or MEG.TO?

    Canadian Natural Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.35%. MEG Energy offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Canadian Natural Resources pays 72.54% of its earnings as a dividend. MEG Energy pays out 5.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CNQ.TO or MEG.TO?

    Canadian Natural Resources quarterly revenues are $12.7B, which are larger than MEG Energy quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Canadian Natural Resources's net income of $2.5B is higher than MEG Energy's net income of $211M. Notably, Canadian Natural Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.86x while MEG Energy's PE ratio is 11.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canadian Natural Resources is 2.01x versus 1.27x for MEG Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CNQ.TO
    Canadian Natural Resources
    2.01x 11.86x $12.7B $2.5B
    MEG.TO
    MEG Energy
    1.27x 11.26x $1.3B $211M
  • Which has Higher Returns CNQ.TO or POU.TO?

    Paramount Resources has a net margin of 19.34% compared to Canadian Natural Resources's net margin of 15.66%. Canadian Natural Resources's return on equity of 19.06% beat Paramount Resources's return on equity of 45.34%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CNQ.TO
    Canadian Natural Resources
    27.98% $1.17 $57.9B
    POU.TO
    Paramount Resources
    45.36% $8.74 $2.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About CNQ.TO or POU.TO?

    Canadian Natural Resources has a consensus price target of $51.42, signalling upside risk potential of 19.67%. On the other hand Paramount Resources has an analysts' consensus of $23.90 which suggests that it could grow by 12%. Given that Canadian Natural Resources has higher upside potential than Paramount Resources, analysts believe Canadian Natural Resources is more attractive than Paramount Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CNQ.TO
    Canadian Natural Resources
    9 7 0
    POU.TO
    Paramount Resources
    5 3 0
  • Is CNQ.TO or POU.TO More Risky?

    Canadian Natural Resources has a beta of 1.444, which suggesting that the stock is 44.399% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Resources has a beta of 1.810, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.013%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNQ.TO or POU.TO?

    Canadian Natural Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.35%. Paramount Resources offers a yield of 5.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Canadian Natural Resources pays 72.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Resources pays out 73.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CNQ.TO or POU.TO?

    Canadian Natural Resources quarterly revenues are $12.7B, which are larger than Paramount Resources quarterly revenues of $376.3M. Canadian Natural Resources's net income of $2.5B is higher than Paramount Resources's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Canadian Natural Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.86x while Paramount Resources's PE ratio is 2.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canadian Natural Resources is 2.01x versus 1.63x for Paramount Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CNQ.TO
    Canadian Natural Resources
    2.01x 11.86x $12.7B $2.5B
    POU.TO
    Paramount Resources
    1.63x 2.03x $376.3M $1.3B

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?

Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…

Can Levi Stock Double?
Can Levi Stock Double?

Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…

How High Can SharkNinja Stock Go?
How High Can SharkNinja Stock Go?

If you know popular consumer appliance brands Shark and Ninja,…

Stock Ideas

Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 58x

Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Alerts

Buy
82
SBET alert for Jul 17

SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 4.23% over the past day.

Buy
89
EXOD alert for Jul 17

Exodus Movement [EXOD] is up 1.2% over the past day.

Sell
42
VLCN alert for Jul 17

Volcon [VLCN] is up 177.74% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock