WM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a net margin of 10.59% compared to Waste Management's net margin of -25.67%. Waste Management's return on equity of 33.94% beat Perma-Fix Environmental Services's return on equity of -39.8%.

Waste Management has a consensus price target of $249.96, signalling upside risk potential of 10.67%. On the other hand Perma-Fix Environmental Services has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could grow by 57.21%. Given that Perma-Fix Environmental Services has higher upside potential than Waste Management, analysts believe Perma-Fix Environmental Services is more attractive than Waste Management.

Waste Management has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a beta of 0.285, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.538%.

Waste Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.4%. Perma-Fix Environmental Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waste Management pays 44.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Perma-Fix Environmental Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waste Management quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than Perma-Fix Environmental Services quarterly revenues of $13.9M. Waste Management's net income of $637M is higher than Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Waste Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.07x while Perma-Fix Environmental Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waste Management is 3.98x versus 3.13x for Perma-Fix Environmental Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pacific Green Technologies has a net margin of 10.59% compared to Waste Management's net margin of --. Waste Management's return on equity of 33.94% beat Pacific Green Technologies's return on equity of --.

Waste Management has a consensus price target of $249.96, signalling upside risk potential of 10.67%. On the other hand Pacific Green Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Waste Management has higher upside potential than Pacific Green Technologies, analysts believe Waste Management is more attractive than Pacific Green Technologies.

Waste Management has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacific Green Technologies has a beta of 0.256, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.445%.

Waste Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.4%. Pacific Green Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waste Management pays 44.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Green Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waste Management quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than Pacific Green Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Waste Management's net income of $637M is higher than Pacific Green Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Waste Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.07x while Pacific Green Technologies's PE ratio is 3.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waste Management is 3.98x versus 4.67x for Pacific Green Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rainmaker Worldwide has a net margin of 10.59% compared to Waste Management's net margin of --. Waste Management's return on equity of 33.94% beat Rainmaker Worldwide's return on equity of --.

Waste Management has a consensus price target of $249.96, signalling upside risk potential of 10.67%. On the other hand Rainmaker Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Waste Management has higher upside potential than Rainmaker Worldwide, analysts believe Waste Management is more attractive than Rainmaker Worldwide.

Waste Management has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rainmaker Worldwide has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Waste Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.4%. Rainmaker Worldwide offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waste Management pays 44.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Rainmaker Worldwide pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waste Management quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than Rainmaker Worldwide quarterly revenues of --. Waste Management's net income of $637M is higher than Rainmaker Worldwide's net income of --. Notably, Waste Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.07x while Rainmaker Worldwide's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waste Management is 3.98x versus -- for Rainmaker Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Republic Services has a net margin of 10.59% compared to Waste Management's net margin of 12.35%. Waste Management's return on equity of 33.94% beat Republic Services's return on equity of 18.57%.

Waste Management has a consensus price target of $249.96, signalling upside risk potential of 10.67%. On the other hand Republic Services has an analysts' consensus of $259.29 which suggests that it could grow by 7.43%. Given that Waste Management has higher upside potential than Republic Services, analysts believe Waste Management is more attractive than Republic Services.

Waste Management has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Republic Services has a beta of 0.610, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.966%.

Waste Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.4%. Republic Services offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Waste Management pays 44.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Republic Services pays out 33.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waste Management quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than Republic Services quarterly revenues of $4B. Waste Management's net income of $637M is higher than Republic Services's net income of $495M. Notably, Waste Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.07x while Republic Services's PE ratio is 36.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waste Management is 3.98x versus 4.69x for Republic Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.