TSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Beyond Meat has a net margin of 0.05% compared to Tyson Foods's net margin of -76.99%. Tyson Foods's return on equity of 4.96% beat Beyond Meat's return on equity of --.

Tyson Foods has a consensus price target of $65.95, signalling upside risk potential of 22.97%. On the other hand Beyond Meat has an analysts' consensus of $2.75 which suggests that it could fall by -17.54%. Given that Tyson Foods has higher upside potential than Beyond Meat, analysts believe Tyson Foods is more attractive than Beyond Meat.

Tyson Foods has a beta of 0.591, which suggesting that the stock is 40.901% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Beyond Meat has a beta of 2.191, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 119.051%.

Tyson Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. Beyond Meat offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tyson Foods pays 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Beyond Meat pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tyson Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tyson Foods quarterly revenues are $13.1B, which are larger than Beyond Meat quarterly revenues of $68.7M. Tyson Foods's net income of $7M is higher than Beyond Meat's net income of -$52.9M. Notably, Tyson Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.87x while Beyond Meat's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tyson Foods is 0.36x versus 0.72x for Beyond Meat. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Clorox has a net margin of 0.05% compared to Tyson Foods's net margin of 11.15%. Tyson Foods's return on equity of 4.96% beat Clorox's return on equity of 270.67%.

Tyson Foods has a consensus price target of $65.95, signalling upside risk potential of 22.97%. On the other hand Clorox has an analysts' consensus of $142.95 which suggests that it could grow by 12.65%. Given that Tyson Foods has higher upside potential than Clorox, analysts believe Tyson Foods is more attractive than Clorox.

Tyson Foods has a beta of 0.591, which suggesting that the stock is 40.901% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clorox has a beta of 0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.096%.

Tyson Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. Clorox offers a yield of 3.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Tyson Foods pays 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Clorox pays out 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Tyson Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Tyson Foods quarterly revenues are $13.1B, which are larger than Clorox quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Tyson Foods's net income of $7M is lower than Clorox's net income of $186M. Notably, Tyson Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.87x while Clorox's PE ratio is 22.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tyson Foods is 0.36x versus 2.25x for Clorox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hormel Foods has a net margin of 0.05% compared to Tyson Foods's net margin of 6.21%. Tyson Foods's return on equity of 4.96% beat Hormel Foods's return on equity of 9.38%.

Tyson Foods has a consensus price target of $65.95, signalling upside risk potential of 22.97%. On the other hand Hormel Foods has an analysts' consensus of $32.32 which suggests that it could grow by 8.06%. Given that Tyson Foods has higher upside potential than Hormel Foods, analysts believe Tyson Foods is more attractive than Hormel Foods.

Tyson Foods has a beta of 0.591, which suggesting that the stock is 40.901% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hormel Foods has a beta of 0.328, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.223%.

Tyson Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. Hormel Foods offers a yield of 3.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Tyson Foods pays 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Hormel Foods pays out 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tyson Foods quarterly revenues are $13.1B, which are larger than Hormel Foods quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Tyson Foods's net income of $7M is lower than Hormel Foods's net income of $180M. Notably, Tyson Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.87x while Hormel Foods's PE ratio is 21.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tyson Foods is 0.36x versus 1.38x for Hormel Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pilgrims Pride has a net margin of 0.05% compared to Tyson Foods's net margin of 6.63%. Tyson Foods's return on equity of 4.96% beat Pilgrims Pride's return on equity of 32.03%.

Tyson Foods has a consensus price target of $65.95, signalling upside risk potential of 22.97%. On the other hand Pilgrims Pride has an analysts' consensus of $47.57 which suggests that it could grow by 7.72%. Given that Tyson Foods has higher upside potential than Pilgrims Pride, analysts believe Tyson Foods is more attractive than Pilgrims Pride.

Tyson Foods has a beta of 0.591, which suggesting that the stock is 40.901% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pilgrims Pride has a beta of 0.451, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.949%.

Tyson Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. Pilgrims Pride offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $6.30 per share. Tyson Foods pays 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Pilgrims Pride pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tyson Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tyson Foods quarterly revenues are $13.1B, which are larger than Pilgrims Pride quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Tyson Foods's net income of $7M is lower than Pilgrims Pride's net income of $296M. Notably, Tyson Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.87x while Pilgrims Pride's PE ratio is 8.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tyson Foods is 0.36x versus 0.58x for Pilgrims Pride. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.