T Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comcast has a net margin of 14.21% compared to AT&T's net margin of 11.29%. AT&T's return on equity of 9.84% beat Comcast's return on equity of 18.38%.

AT&T has a consensus price target of $29.93, signalling upside risk potential of 11.07%. On the other hand Comcast has an analysts' consensus of $40.2200 which suggests that it could grow by 16.92%. Given that Comcast has higher upside potential than AT&T, analysts believe Comcast is more attractive than AT&T.

AT&T has a beta of 0.409, which suggesting that the stock is 59.078% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comcast has a beta of 0.948, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.185%.

AT&T has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. Comcast offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. AT&T pays 74.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Comcast pays out 29.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AT&T quarterly revenues are $30.6B, which are larger than Comcast quarterly revenues of $29.9B. AT&T's net income of $4.4B is higher than Comcast's net income of $3.4B. Notably, AT&T's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.53x while Comcast's PE ratio is 8.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AT&T is 1.58x versus 1.07x for Comcast. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lumen Technologies has a net margin of 14.21% compared to AT&T's net margin of -6.32%. AT&T's return on equity of 9.84% beat Lumen Technologies's return on equity of -75.79%.

AT&T has a consensus price target of $29.93, signalling upside risk potential of 11.07%. On the other hand Lumen Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $4.90 which suggests that it could grow by 8.69%. Given that AT&T has higher upside potential than Lumen Technologies, analysts believe AT&T is more attractive than Lumen Technologies.

AT&T has a beta of 0.409, which suggesting that the stock is 59.078% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumen Technologies has a beta of 1.392, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.177%.

AT&T has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. Lumen Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AT&T pays 74.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Lumen Technologies pays out -5.46% of its earnings as a dividend. AT&T's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AT&T quarterly revenues are $30.6B, which are larger than Lumen Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.2B. AT&T's net income of $4.4B is higher than Lumen Technologies's net income of -$201M. Notably, AT&T's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.53x while Lumen Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AT&T is 1.58x versus 0.34x for Lumen Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

T-Mobile US has a net margin of 14.21% compared to AT&T's net margin of 14.14%. AT&T's return on equity of 9.84% beat T-Mobile US's return on equity of 19.11%.

AT&T has a consensus price target of $29.93, signalling upside risk potential of 11.07%. On the other hand T-Mobile US has an analysts' consensus of $266.08 which suggests that it could grow by 16.33%. Given that T-Mobile US has higher upside potential than AT&T, analysts believe T-Mobile US is more attractive than AT&T.

AT&T has a beta of 0.409, which suggesting that the stock is 59.078% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T-Mobile US has a beta of 0.618, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.192%.

AT&T has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. T-Mobile US offers a yield of 1.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. AT&T pays 74.97% of its earnings as a dividend. T-Mobile US pays out 29.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AT&T quarterly revenues are $30.6B, which are larger than T-Mobile US quarterly revenues of $20.9B. AT&T's net income of $4.4B is higher than T-Mobile US's net income of $3B. Notably, AT&T's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.53x while T-Mobile US's PE ratio is 22.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AT&T is 1.58x versus 3.21x for T-Mobile US. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verizon Communications has a net margin of 14.21% compared to AT&T's net margin of 14.57%. AT&T's return on equity of 9.84% beat Verizon Communications's return on equity of 18.02%.

AT&T has a consensus price target of $29.93, signalling upside risk potential of 11.07%. On the other hand Verizon Communications has an analysts' consensus of $48.45 which suggests that it could grow by 17.45%. Given that Verizon Communications has higher upside potential than AT&T, analysts believe Verizon Communications is more attractive than AT&T.

AT&T has a beta of 0.409, which suggesting that the stock is 59.078% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verizon Communications has a beta of 0.375, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.498%.

AT&T has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. Verizon Communications offers a yield of 6.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. AT&T pays 74.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Verizon Communications pays out 64.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AT&T quarterly revenues are $30.6B, which are smaller than Verizon Communications quarterly revenues of $33.5B. AT&T's net income of $4.4B is lower than Verizon Communications's net income of $4.9B. Notably, AT&T's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.53x while Verizon Communications's PE ratio is 9.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AT&T is 1.58x versus 1.29x for Verizon Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.