STI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

W.W. Grainger has a net margin of -- compared to Solidion Technology's net margin of 11.12%. Solidion Technology's return on equity of -- beat W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 51.62%.

Solidion Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand W.W. Grainger has an analysts' consensus of $1,078.61 which suggests that it could grow by 5.52%. Given that W.W. Grainger has higher upside potential than Solidion Technology, analysts believe W.W. Grainger is more attractive than Solidion Technology.

Solidion Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.183, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.282%.

Solidion Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. W.W. Grainger offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share. Solidion Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger pays out 22.05% of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Solidion Technology quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Solidion Technology's net income of $9.2M is lower than W.W. Grainger's net income of $479M. Notably, Solidion Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.67x while W.W. Grainger's PE ratio is 26.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solidion Technology is -- versus 2.89x for W.W. Grainger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hayward Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Solidion Technology's net margin of 6.26%. Solidion Technology's return on equity of -- beat Hayward Holdings's return on equity of 8.91%.

Solidion Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hayward Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.93 which suggests that it could grow by 8.28%. Given that Hayward Holdings has higher upside potential than Solidion Technology, analysts believe Hayward Holdings is more attractive than Solidion Technology.

Solidion Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hayward Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Solidion Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hayward Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solidion Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hayward Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Solidion Technology quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hayward Holdings quarterly revenues of $228.8M. Solidion Technology's net income of $9.2M is lower than Hayward Holdings's net income of $14.3M. Notably, Solidion Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.67x while Hayward Holdings's PE ratio is 26.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solidion Technology is -- versus 3.05x for Hayward Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Masco has a net margin of -- compared to Solidion Technology's net margin of 10.33%. Solidion Technology's return on equity of -- beat Masco's return on equity of 939.57%.

Solidion Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Masco has an analysts' consensus of $70.60 which suggests that it could grow by 7.16%. Given that Masco has higher upside potential than Solidion Technology, analysts believe Masco is more attractive than Solidion Technology.

Solidion Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Masco has a beta of 1.186, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.649%.

Solidion Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Masco offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Solidion Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Masco pays out 30.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Masco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Solidion Technology quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Masco quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Solidion Technology's net income of $9.2M is lower than Masco's net income of $186M. Notably, Solidion Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.67x while Masco's PE ratio is 18.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solidion Technology is -- versus 1.85x for Masco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WESCO International has a net margin of -- compared to Solidion Technology's net margin of 2.22%. Solidion Technology's return on equity of -- beat WESCO International's return on equity of 14.48%.

Solidion Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WESCO International has an analysts' consensus of $212.51 which suggests that it could grow by 3.49%. Given that WESCO International has higher upside potential than Solidion Technology, analysts believe WESCO International is more attractive than Solidion Technology.

Solidion Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WESCO International has a beta of 1.834, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.374%.

Solidion Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WESCO International offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Solidion Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WESCO International pays out 19.36% of its earnings as a dividend. WESCO International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Solidion Technology quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WESCO International quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Solidion Technology's net income of $9.2M is lower than WESCO International's net income of $118.4M. Notably, Solidion Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.67x while WESCO International's PE ratio is 15.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solidion Technology is -- versus 0.47x for WESCO International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.