
Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHW
Sherwin-Williams
|
$6.3B | $3.81 | 0.66% | 8.95% | $377.02 |
CENX
Century Aluminum
|
$611.6M | $0.33 | 8.08% | -73.89% | $22.50 |
FRD
Friedman Industries
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
|
-- | -$0.02 | -- | -33.33% | $1.70 |
RPM
RPM International
|
$2B | $1.59 | 3.52% | 4.98% | $122.89 |
XPL
Solitario Resources
|
-- | -$0.02 | -- | -100% | $1.50 |
Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHW
Sherwin-Williams
|
$339.86 | $377.02 | $85.2B | 32.12x | $0.79 | 0.89% | 3.74x |
CENX
Century Aluminum
|
$20.09 | $22.50 | $1.9B | 17.32x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.82x |
FRD
Friedman Industries
|
$15.66 | -- | $110.6M | 18.21x | $0.04 | 1.02% | 0.24x |
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
|
$0.68 | $1.70 | $48.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
RPM
RPM International
|
$110.59 | $122.89 | $14.2B | 22.16x | $0.51 | 1.85% | 1.94x |
XPL
Solitario Resources
|
$0.66 | $1.50 | $58.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|
SHW
Sherwin-Williams
|
72.29% | 1.023 | 12.31% | 0.38x |
CENX
Century Aluminum
|
39.92% | 1.825 | 28.46% | 0.54x |
FRD
Friedman Industries
|
26.49% | 0.363 | 46.25% | 1.34x |
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
|
-- | 1.260 | -- | -- |
RPM
RPM International
|
43.95% | 1.132 | 13.18% | 1.08x |
XPL
Solitario Resources
|
-- | 0.385 | -- | -- |
Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHW
Sherwin-Williams
|
$2.6B | $754.3M | 18.75% | 68.4% | 14.26% | -$250.4M |
CENX
Century Aluminum
|
$60.6M | $46.1M | 10.58% | 18.99% | 6.17% | $51.1M |
FRD
Friedman Industries
|
$17.3M | $5.7M | 3.59% | 4.71% | 5.9% | -$12.8M |
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
|
-$185.4K | -$2.2M | -- | -- | -- | -$1.6M |
RPM
RPM International
|
$567.5M | $65.8M | 13.75% | 24.93% | 4.33% | $33.3M |
XPL
Solitario Resources
|
-$7K | -$736K | -- | -- | -- | -$598K |
Century Aluminum has a net margin of 9.5% compared to Sherwin-Williams's net margin of 4.69%. Sherwin-Williams's return on equity of 68.4% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 18.99%.
Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
---|---|---|---|
SHW
Sherwin-Williams
|
48.23% | $2.00 | $14.9B |
CENX
Century Aluminum
|
9.56% | $0.29 | $1.2B |
Sherwin-Williams has a consensus price target of $377.02, signalling upside risk potential of 10.93%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $22.50 which suggests that it could grow by 12%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Sherwin-Williams, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Sherwin-Williams.
Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
---|---|---|---|
SHW
Sherwin-Williams
|
11 | 11 | 0 |
CENX
Century Aluminum
|
2 | 0 | 0 |
Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.183, which suggesting that the stock is 18.284% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.547, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 154.749%.
Sherwin-Williams has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sherwin-Williams pays 26.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sherwin-Williams's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Sherwin-Williams quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $633.9M. Sherwin-Williams's net income of $503.9M is higher than Century Aluminum's net income of $29.7M. Notably, Sherwin-Williams's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.12x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 17.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sherwin-Williams is 3.74x versus 0.82x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
---|---|---|---|---|
SHW
Sherwin-Williams
|
3.74x | 32.12x | $5.3B | $503.9M |
CENX
Century Aluminum
|
0.82x | 17.32x | $633.9M | $29.7M |
Friedman Industries has a net margin of 9.5% compared to Sherwin-Williams's net margin of 4.14%. Sherwin-Williams's return on equity of 68.4% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.71%.
Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
---|---|---|---|
SHW
Sherwin-Williams
|
48.23% | $2.00 | $14.9B |
FRD
Friedman Industries
|
13.38% | $0.76 | $180.2M |
Sherwin-Williams has a consensus price target of $377.02, signalling upside risk potential of 10.93%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sherwin-Williams has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Sherwin-Williams is more attractive than Friedman Industries.
Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
---|---|---|---|
SHW
Sherwin-Williams
|
11 | 11 | 0 |
FRD
Friedman Industries
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.183, which suggesting that the stock is 18.284% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.485, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.545%.
Sherwin-Williams has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Sherwin-Williams pays 26.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Sherwin-Williams quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $129.2M. Sherwin-Williams's net income of $503.9M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of $5.3M. Notably, Sherwin-Williams's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.12x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 18.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sherwin-Williams is 3.74x versus 0.24x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
---|---|---|---|---|
SHW
Sherwin-Williams
|
3.74x | 32.12x | $5.3B | $503.9M |
FRD
Friedman Industries
|
0.24x | 18.21x | $129.2M | $5.3M |
Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 9.5% compared to Sherwin-Williams's net margin of --. Sherwin-Williams's return on equity of 68.4% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.
Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
---|---|---|---|
SHW
Sherwin-Williams
|
48.23% | $2.00 | $14.9B |
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
|
-- | -$0.04 | -- |
Sherwin-Williams has a consensus price target of $377.02, signalling upside risk potential of 10.93%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 149.19%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Sherwin-Williams, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Sherwin-Williams.
Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
---|---|---|---|
SHW
Sherwin-Williams
|
11 | 11 | 0 |
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
|
1 | 0 | 0 |
Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.183, which suggesting that the stock is 18.284% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.135, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.451%.
Sherwin-Williams has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sherwin-Williams pays 26.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sherwin-Williams's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Sherwin-Williams quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Sherwin-Williams's net income of $503.9M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Sherwin-Williams's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.12x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sherwin-Williams is 3.74x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
---|---|---|---|---|
SHW
Sherwin-Williams
|
3.74x | 32.12x | $5.3B | $503.9M |
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
|
-- | -- | -- | -$2.6M |
RPM International has a net margin of 9.5% compared to Sherwin-Williams's net margin of 3.52%. Sherwin-Williams's return on equity of 68.4% beat RPM International's return on equity of 24.93%.
Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
---|---|---|---|
SHW
Sherwin-Williams
|
48.23% | $2.00 | $14.9B |
RPM
RPM International
|
38.43% | $0.40 | $4.8B |
Sherwin-Williams has a consensus price target of $377.02, signalling upside risk potential of 10.93%. On the other hand RPM International has an analysts' consensus of $122.89 which suggests that it could grow by 11.12%. Given that RPM International has higher upside potential than Sherwin-Williams, analysts believe RPM International is more attractive than Sherwin-Williams.
Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
---|---|---|---|
SHW
Sherwin-Williams
|
11 | 11 | 0 |
RPM
RPM International
|
7 | 6 | 0 |
Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.183, which suggesting that the stock is 18.284% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RPM International has a beta of 1.036, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.604%.
Sherwin-Williams has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. RPM International offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Sherwin-Williams pays 26.98% of its earnings as a dividend. RPM International pays out 39.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Sherwin-Williams quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than RPM International quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Sherwin-Williams's net income of $503.9M is higher than RPM International's net income of $52M. Notably, Sherwin-Williams's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.12x while RPM International's PE ratio is 22.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sherwin-Williams is 3.74x versus 1.94x for RPM International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
---|---|---|---|---|
SHW
Sherwin-Williams
|
3.74x | 32.12x | $5.3B | $503.9M |
RPM
RPM International
|
1.94x | 22.16x | $1.5B | $52M |
Solitario Resources has a net margin of 9.5% compared to Sherwin-Williams's net margin of --. Sherwin-Williams's return on equity of 68.4% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.
Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
---|---|---|---|
SHW
Sherwin-Williams
|
48.23% | $2.00 | $14.9B |
XPL
Solitario Resources
|
-- | -$0.01 | -- |
Sherwin-Williams has a consensus price target of $377.02, signalling upside risk potential of 10.93%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 128.94%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Sherwin-Williams, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Sherwin-Williams.
Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
---|---|---|---|
SHW
Sherwin-Williams
|
11 | 11 | 0 |
XPL
Solitario Resources
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.183, which suggesting that the stock is 18.284% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.534%.
Sherwin-Williams has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sherwin-Williams pays 26.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sherwin-Williams's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Sherwin-Williams quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Sherwin-Williams's net income of $503.9M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, Sherwin-Williams's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.12x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sherwin-Williams is 3.74x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
---|---|---|---|---|
SHW
Sherwin-Williams
|
3.74x | 32.12x | $5.3B | $503.9M |
XPL
Solitario Resources
|
-- | -- | -- | -$511K |
Signup to receive the latest stock alerts
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 58x
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 2.6% over the past day.
Exodus Movement [EXOD] is down 4.14% over the past day.
Unity Software [U] is up 7.51% over the past day.