SE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BrilliA has a net margin of 8.33% compared to Sea's net margin of --. Sea's return on equity of 11.14% beat BrilliA's return on equity of --.

Sea has a consensus price target of $177.27, signalling upside risk potential of 9.9%. On the other hand BrilliA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sea has higher upside potential than BrilliA, analysts believe Sea is more attractive than BrilliA.

Sea has a beta of 1.605, which suggesting that the stock is 60.473% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BrilliA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sea has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BrilliA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sea pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BrilliA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sea quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than BrilliA quarterly revenues of --. Sea's net income of $403.1M is higher than BrilliA's net income of --. Notably, Sea's price-to-earnings ratio is 113.59x while BrilliA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sea is 5.65x versus -- for BrilliA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

INNEOVA Holdings has a net margin of 8.33% compared to Sea's net margin of --. Sea's return on equity of 11.14% beat INNEOVA Holdings's return on equity of --.

Sea has a consensus price target of $177.27, signalling upside risk potential of 9.9%. On the other hand INNEOVA Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sea has higher upside potential than INNEOVA Holdings, analysts believe Sea is more attractive than INNEOVA Holdings.

Sea has a beta of 1.605, which suggesting that the stock is 60.473% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison INNEOVA Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sea has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. INNEOVA Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sea pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. INNEOVA Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sea quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than INNEOVA Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Sea's net income of $403.1M is higher than INNEOVA Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Sea's price-to-earnings ratio is 113.59x while INNEOVA Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sea is 5.65x versus 0.22x for INNEOVA Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trip.com Group has a net margin of 8.33% compared to Sea's net margin of 30.93%. Sea's return on equity of 11.14% beat Trip.com Group's return on equity of 12.32%.

Sea has a consensus price target of $177.27, signalling upside risk potential of 9.9%. On the other hand Trip.com Group has an analysts' consensus of $76.28 which suggests that it could grow by 21.09%. Given that Trip.com Group has higher upside potential than Sea, analysts believe Trip.com Group is more attractive than Sea.

Sea has a beta of 1.605, which suggesting that the stock is 60.473% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trip.com Group has a beta of 0.067, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.259%.

Sea has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trip.com Group offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Sea pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trip.com Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sea quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Trip.com Group quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Sea's net income of $403.1M is lower than Trip.com Group's net income of $587.9M. Notably, Sea's price-to-earnings ratio is 113.59x while Trip.com Group's PE ratio is 18.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sea is 5.65x versus 5.71x for Trip.com Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

has a net margin of 8.33% compared to Sea's net margin of --. Sea's return on equity of 11.14% beat 's return on equity of -279.5%.

Sea has a consensus price target of $177.27, signalling upside risk potential of 9.9%. On the other hand has an analysts' consensus of $0.85 which suggests that it could grow by 588.26%. Given that has higher upside potential than Sea, analysts believe is more attractive than Sea.

Sea has a beta of 1.605, which suggesting that the stock is 60.473% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sea has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sea pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sea quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than quarterly revenues of --. Sea's net income of $403.1M is higher than 's net income of --. Notably, Sea's price-to-earnings ratio is 113.59x while 's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sea is 5.65x versus 0.10x for . Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.