SBUX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chipotle Mexican Grill has a net margin of 4.39% compared to Starbucks's net margin of 13.45%. Starbucks's return on equity of -- beat Chipotle Mexican Grill's return on equity of 43.78%.

Starbucks has a consensus price target of $93.95, signalling upside risk potential of 1.56%. On the other hand Chipotle Mexican Grill has an analysts' consensus of $58.97 which suggests that it could grow by 10.47%. Given that Chipotle Mexican Grill has higher upside potential than Starbucks, analysts believe Chipotle Mexican Grill is more attractive than Starbucks.

Starbucks has a beta of 1.016, which suggesting that the stock is 1.625% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chipotle Mexican Grill has a beta of 1.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.623%.

Starbucks has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. Chipotle Mexican Grill offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Starbucks pays 68.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Chipotle Mexican Grill pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Starbucks's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Starbucks quarterly revenues are $8.8B, which are larger than Chipotle Mexican Grill quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Starbucks's net income of $384.2M is lower than Chipotle Mexican Grill's net income of $386.6M. Notably, Starbucks's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.52x while Chipotle Mexican Grill's PE ratio is 47.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Starbucks is 2.90x versus 6.37x for Chipotle Mexican Grill. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Domino's Pizza has a net margin of 4.39% compared to Starbucks's net margin of 13.46%. Starbucks's return on equity of -- beat Domino's Pizza's return on equity of --.

Starbucks has a consensus price target of $93.95, signalling upside risk potential of 1.56%. On the other hand Domino's Pizza has an analysts' consensus of $505.84 which suggests that it could grow by 8.71%. Given that Domino's Pizza has higher upside potential than Starbucks, analysts believe Domino's Pizza is more attractive than Starbucks.

Starbucks has a beta of 1.016, which suggesting that the stock is 1.625% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Domino's Pizza has a beta of 1.087, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.667%.

Starbucks has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. Domino's Pizza offers a yield of 1.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.74 per share. Starbucks pays 68.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Domino's Pizza pays out 35.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Starbucks quarterly revenues are $8.8B, which are larger than Domino's Pizza quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Starbucks's net income of $384.2M is higher than Domino's Pizza's net income of $149.7M. Notably, Starbucks's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.52x while Domino's Pizza's PE ratio is 26.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Starbucks is 2.90x versus 3.42x for Domino's Pizza. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McDonald's has a net margin of 4.39% compared to Starbucks's net margin of 31.37%. Starbucks's return on equity of -- beat McDonald's's return on equity of --.

Starbucks has a consensus price target of $93.95, signalling upside risk potential of 1.56%. On the other hand McDonald's has an analysts' consensus of $328.97 which suggests that it could grow by 10.06%. Given that McDonald's has higher upside potential than Starbucks, analysts believe McDonald's is more attractive than Starbucks.

Starbucks has a beta of 1.016, which suggesting that the stock is 1.625% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McDonald's has a beta of 0.529, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.058%.

Starbucks has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. McDonald's offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.77 per share. Starbucks pays 68.73% of its earnings as a dividend. McDonald's pays out 59.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Starbucks quarterly revenues are $8.8B, which are larger than McDonald's quarterly revenues of $6B. Starbucks's net income of $384.2M is lower than McDonald's's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Starbucks's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.52x while McDonald's's PE ratio is 26.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Starbucks is 2.90x versus 8.37x for McDonald's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum Brands has a net margin of 4.39% compared to Starbucks's net margin of 14.16%. Starbucks's return on equity of -- beat Yum Brands's return on equity of --.

Starbucks has a consensus price target of $93.95, signalling upside risk potential of 1.56%. On the other hand Yum Brands has an analysts' consensus of $159.39 which suggests that it could grow by 9.07%. Given that Yum Brands has higher upside potential than Starbucks, analysts believe Yum Brands is more attractive than Starbucks.

Starbucks has a beta of 1.016, which suggesting that the stock is 1.625% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum Brands has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.237%.

Starbucks has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. Yum Brands offers a yield of 1.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Starbucks pays 68.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands pays out 50.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Starbucks quarterly revenues are $8.8B, which are larger than Yum Brands quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Starbucks's net income of $384.2M is higher than Yum Brands's net income of $253M. Notably, Starbucks's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.52x while Yum Brands's PE ratio is 29.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Starbucks is 2.90x versus 5.37x for Yum Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.