RIG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gran Tierra Energy has a net margin of -8.72% compared to Transocean's net margin of -11.31%. Transocean's return on equity of -6.63% beat Gran Tierra Energy's return on equity of -3.92%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $4.01, signalling upside risk potential of 57.42%. On the other hand Gran Tierra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $6.58 which suggests that it could grow by 43.92%. Given that Transocean has higher upside potential than Gran Tierra Energy, analysts believe Transocean is more attractive than Gran Tierra Energy.

Transocean has a beta of 2.502, which suggesting that the stock is 150.226% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 0.772, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.849%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gran Tierra Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gran Tierra Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $906M, which are larger than Gran Tierra Energy quarterly revenues of $170.5M. Transocean's net income of -$79M is lower than Gran Tierra Energy's net income of -$19.3M. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gran Tierra Energy's PE ratio is 44.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 0.64x versus 0.24x for Gran Tierra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Houston American Energy has a net margin of -8.72% compared to Transocean's net margin of -1008.83%. Transocean's return on equity of -6.63% beat Houston American Energy's return on equity of -112.52%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $4.01, signalling upside risk potential of 57.42%. On the other hand Houston American Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transocean has higher upside potential than Houston American Energy, analysts believe Transocean is more attractive than Houston American Energy.

Transocean has a beta of 2.502, which suggesting that the stock is 150.226% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Houston American Energy has a beta of 0.754, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.608%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Houston American Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Houston American Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $906M, which are larger than Houston American Energy quarterly revenues of $102.4K. Transocean's net income of -$79M is lower than Houston American Energy's net income of -$1M. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Houston American Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 0.64x versus 25.52x for Houston American Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leopard Energy has a net margin of -8.72% compared to Transocean's net margin of -1621.32%. Transocean's return on equity of -6.63% beat Leopard Energy's return on equity of -1169.22%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $4.01, signalling upside risk potential of 57.42%. On the other hand Leopard Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transocean has higher upside potential than Leopard Energy, analysts believe Transocean is more attractive than Leopard Energy.

Transocean has a beta of 2.502, which suggesting that the stock is 150.226% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leopard Energy has a beta of -0.476, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 147.568%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leopard Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leopard Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $906M, which are larger than Leopard Energy quarterly revenues of $1.3K. Transocean's net income of -$79M is lower than Leopard Energy's net income of $86.2K. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Leopard Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 0.64x versus 27.72x for Leopard Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of -8.72% compared to Transocean's net margin of 9.52%. Transocean's return on equity of -6.63% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 12.7%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $4.01, signalling upside risk potential of 57.42%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $124.49 which suggests that it could grow by 10.93%. Given that Transocean has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe Transocean is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

Transocean has a beta of 2.502, which suggesting that the stock is 150.226% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.499, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.08%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $906M, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Transocean's net income of -$79M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.7B. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 14.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 0.64x versus 1.45x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.