R Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Avis Budget Group has a net margin of 3.12% compared to Ryder System's net margin of -24.09%. Ryder System's return on equity of 16.38% beat Avis Budget Group's return on equity of --.

Ryder System has a consensus price target of $177.85, signalling upside risk potential of 3.4%. On the other hand Avis Budget Group has an analysts' consensus of $125.00 which suggests that it could fall by -36.25%. Given that Ryder System has higher upside potential than Avis Budget Group, analysts believe Ryder System is more attractive than Avis Budget Group.

Ryder System has a beta of 0.967, which suggesting that the stock is 3.268% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Avis Budget Group has a beta of 2.184, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.424%.

Ryder System has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Avis Budget Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $10.00 per share. Ryder System pays 27.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Avis Budget Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ryder System quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Avis Budget Group quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Ryder System's net income of $98M is higher than Avis Budget Group's net income of -$505M. Notably, Ryder System's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.00x while Avis Budget Group's PE ratio is 8.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryder System is 0.59x versus 0.62x for Avis Budget Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DriveItAway Holdings has a net margin of 3.12% compared to Ryder System's net margin of -212.64%. Ryder System's return on equity of 16.38% beat DriveItAway Holdings's return on equity of --.

Ryder System has a consensus price target of $177.85, signalling upside risk potential of 3.4%. On the other hand DriveItAway Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ryder System has higher upside potential than DriveItAway Holdings, analysts believe Ryder System is more attractive than DriveItAway Holdings.

Ryder System has a beta of 0.967, which suggesting that the stock is 3.268% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DriveItAway Holdings has a beta of -7.089, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 808.939%.

Ryder System has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. DriveItAway Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ryder System pays 27.61% of its earnings as a dividend. DriveItAway Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ryder System quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than DriveItAway Holdings quarterly revenues of $210.7K. Ryder System's net income of $98M is higher than DriveItAway Holdings's net income of -$448K. Notably, Ryder System's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.00x while DriveItAway Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryder System is 0.59x versus 18.75x for DriveItAway Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hertz Global Holdings has a net margin of 3.12% compared to Ryder System's net margin of -24.44%. Ryder System's return on equity of 16.38% beat Hertz Global Holdings's return on equity of -291.93%.

Ryder System has a consensus price target of $177.85, signalling upside risk potential of 3.4%. On the other hand Hertz Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $3.99 which suggests that it could fall by -49.39%. Given that Ryder System has higher upside potential than Hertz Global Holdings, analysts believe Ryder System is more attractive than Hertz Global Holdings.

Ryder System has a beta of 0.967, which suggesting that the stock is 3.268% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hertz Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ryder System has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Hertz Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ryder System pays 27.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Hertz Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ryder System quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Hertz Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Ryder System's net income of $98M is higher than Hertz Global Holdings's net income of -$443M. Notably, Ryder System's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.00x while Hertz Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryder System is 0.59x versus 0.28x for Hertz Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

U-Haul Holding has a net margin of 3.12% compared to Ryder System's net margin of -6.67%. Ryder System's return on equity of 16.38% beat U-Haul Holding's return on equity of 4.94%.

Ryder System has a consensus price target of $177.85, signalling upside risk potential of 3.4%. On the other hand U-Haul Holding has an analysts' consensus of $89.84 which suggests that it could grow by 46.53%. Given that U-Haul Holding has higher upside potential than Ryder System, analysts believe U-Haul Holding is more attractive than Ryder System.

Ryder System has a beta of 0.967, which suggesting that the stock is 3.268% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison U-Haul Holding has a beta of 1.252, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.188%.

Ryder System has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. U-Haul Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ryder System pays 27.61% of its earnings as a dividend. U-Haul Holding pays out 9.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ryder System quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than U-Haul Holding quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Ryder System's net income of $98M is higher than U-Haul Holding's net income of -$82.3M. Notably, Ryder System's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.00x while U-Haul Holding's PE ratio is 36.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryder System is 0.59x versus 2.06x for U-Haul Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.