PWR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EMCOR Group has a net margin of 2.31% compared to Quanta Services's net margin of 6.22%. Quanta Services's return on equity of 13.36% beat EMCOR Group's return on equity of 37.5%.

Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $355.63, signalling downside risk potential of -8.65%. On the other hand EMCOR Group has an analysts' consensus of $533.02 which suggests that it could fall by -3.67%. Given that Quanta Services has more downside risk than EMCOR Group, analysts believe EMCOR Group is more attractive than Quanta Services.

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.633% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.244, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.374%.

Quanta Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. EMCOR Group offers a yield of 0.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Quanta Services pays 5.99% of its earnings as a dividend. EMCOR Group pays out 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quanta Services quarterly revenues are $6.2B, which are larger than EMCOR Group quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Quanta Services's net income of $144.3M is lower than EMCOR Group's net income of $240.7M. Notably, Quanta Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.76x while EMCOR Group's PE ratio is 24.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quanta Services is 2.35x versus 1.71x for EMCOR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IES Holdings has a net margin of 2.31% compared to Quanta Services's net margin of 8.47%. Quanta Services's return on equity of 13.36% beat IES Holdings's return on equity of 38.3%.

Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $355.63, signalling downside risk potential of -8.65%. On the other hand IES Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $340.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.3%. Given that IES Holdings has higher upside potential than Quanta Services, analysts believe IES Holdings is more attractive than Quanta Services.

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.633% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IES Holdings has a beta of 1.631, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.112%.

Quanta Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. IES Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quanta Services pays 5.99% of its earnings as a dividend. IES Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quanta Services quarterly revenues are $6.2B, which are larger than IES Holdings quarterly revenues of $834M. Quanta Services's net income of $144.3M is higher than IES Holdings's net income of $70.7M. Notably, Quanta Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.76x while IES Holdings's PE ratio is 27.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quanta Services is 2.35x versus 2.10x for IES Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MasTec has a net margin of 2.31% compared to Quanta Services's net margin of 0.35%. Quanta Services's return on equity of 13.36% beat MasTec's return on equity of 7.53%.

Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $355.63, signalling downside risk potential of -8.65%. On the other hand MasTec has an analysts' consensus of $178.81 which suggests that it could grow by 2.55%. Given that MasTec has higher upside potential than Quanta Services, analysts believe MasTec is more attractive than Quanta Services.

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.633% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MasTec has a beta of 1.749, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.884%.

Quanta Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. MasTec offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quanta Services pays 5.99% of its earnings as a dividend. MasTec pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quanta Services quarterly revenues are $6.2B, which are larger than MasTec quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Quanta Services's net income of $144.3M is higher than MasTec's net income of $9.9M. Notably, Quanta Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.76x while MasTec's PE ratio is 64.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quanta Services is 2.35x versus 1.10x for MasTec. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sunvault Energy has a net margin of 2.31% compared to Quanta Services's net margin of --. Quanta Services's return on equity of 13.36% beat Sunvault Energy's return on equity of --.

Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $355.63, signalling downside risk potential of -8.65%. On the other hand Sunvault Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Quanta Services has higher upside potential than Sunvault Energy, analysts believe Quanta Services is more attractive than Sunvault Energy.

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.633% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunvault Energy has a beta of 0.707, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.339%.

Quanta Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. Sunvault Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quanta Services pays 5.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Sunvault Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quanta Services quarterly revenues are $6.2B, which are larger than Sunvault Energy quarterly revenues of --. Quanta Services's net income of $144.3M is higher than Sunvault Energy's net income of --. Notably, Quanta Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.76x while Sunvault Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quanta Services is 2.35x versus 0.20x for Sunvault Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.