OMC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lendway has a net margin of 6.42% compared to Omnicom Group's net margin of 3.61%. Omnicom Group's return on equity of 26.84% beat Lendway's return on equity of -29.67%.

Omnicom Group has a consensus price target of $98.91, signalling upside risk potential of 33.58%. On the other hand Lendway has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Omnicom Group has higher upside potential than Lendway, analysts believe Omnicom Group is more attractive than Lendway.

Omnicom Group has a beta of 0.918, which suggesting that the stock is 8.186% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lendway has a beta of 2.469, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.885%.

Omnicom Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.78%. Lendway offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Omnicom Group pays 37.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Lendway pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Omnicom Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Omnicom Group quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Lendway quarterly revenues of $12.4M. Omnicom Group's net income of $257.6M is higher than Lendway's net income of $449K. Notably, Omnicom Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.62x while Lendway's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omnicom Group is 0.92x versus 0.21x for Lendway. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Magnite has a net margin of 6.42% compared to Omnicom Group's net margin of -6.19%. Omnicom Group's return on equity of 26.84% beat Magnite's return on equity of 4.24%.

Omnicom Group has a consensus price target of $98.91, signalling upside risk potential of 33.58%. On the other hand Magnite has an analysts' consensus of $22.72 which suggests that it could fall by -5.53%. Given that Omnicom Group has higher upside potential than Magnite, analysts believe Omnicom Group is more attractive than Magnite.

Omnicom Group has a beta of 0.918, which suggesting that the stock is 8.186% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magnite has a beta of 2.922, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 192.224%.

Omnicom Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.78%. Magnite offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Omnicom Group pays 37.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Magnite pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Omnicom Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Omnicom Group quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Magnite quarterly revenues of $155.8M. Omnicom Group's net income of $257.6M is higher than Magnite's net income of -$9.6M. Notably, Omnicom Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.62x while Magnite's PE ratio is 120.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omnicom Group is 0.92x versus 5.32x for Magnite. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WPP PLC has a net margin of 6.42% compared to Omnicom Group's net margin of --. Omnicom Group's return on equity of 26.84% beat WPP PLC's return on equity of 14.21%.

Omnicom Group has a consensus price target of $98.91, signalling upside risk potential of 33.58%. On the other hand WPP PLC has an analysts' consensus of $35.95 which suggests that it could grow by 28.81%. Given that Omnicom Group has higher upside potential than WPP PLC, analysts believe Omnicom Group is more attractive than WPP PLC.

Omnicom Group has a beta of 0.918, which suggesting that the stock is 8.186% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WPP PLC has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.732%.

Omnicom Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.78%. WPP PLC offers a yield of 9.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.66 per share. Omnicom Group pays 37.33% of its earnings as a dividend. WPP PLC pays out 78.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Omnicom Group quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than WPP PLC quarterly revenues of --. Omnicom Group's net income of $257.6M is higher than WPP PLC's net income of --. Notably, Omnicom Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.62x while WPP PLC's PE ratio is 11.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omnicom Group is 0.92x versus 0.33x for WPP PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ziff Davis has a net margin of 6.42% compared to Omnicom Group's net margin of 7.38%. Omnicom Group's return on equity of 26.84% beat Ziff Davis's return on equity of 4.19%.

Omnicom Group has a consensus price target of $98.91, signalling upside risk potential of 33.58%. On the other hand Ziff Davis has an analysts' consensus of $41.33 which suggests that it could grow by 33.85%. Given that Ziff Davis has higher upside potential than Omnicom Group, analysts believe Ziff Davis is more attractive than Omnicom Group.

Omnicom Group has a beta of 0.918, which suggesting that the stock is 8.186% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ziff Davis has a beta of 1.580, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.999%.

Omnicom Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.78%. Ziff Davis offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Omnicom Group pays 37.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Ziff Davis pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Omnicom Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Omnicom Group quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Ziff Davis quarterly revenues of $328.6M. Omnicom Group's net income of $257.6M is higher than Ziff Davis's net income of $24.2M. Notably, Omnicom Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.62x while Ziff Davis's PE ratio is 18.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omnicom Group is 0.92x versus 0.99x for Ziff Davis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.