L Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CNA Financial has a net margin of 8.34% compared to Loews's net margin of 7.67%. Loews's return on equity of 7.5% beat CNA Financial's return on equity of 8.76%.

Loews has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -64.81%. On the other hand CNA Financial has an analysts' consensus of $45.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2.83%. Given that CNA Financial has higher upside potential than Loews, analysts believe CNA Financial is more attractive than Loews.

Loews has a beta of 0.702, which suggesting that the stock is 29.798% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNA Financial has a beta of 0.511, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.933%.

Loews has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.28%. CNA Financial offers a yield of 4.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Loews pays 3.89% of its earnings as a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Loews's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

Loews quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than CNA Financial quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Loews's net income of $370M is higher than CNA Financial's net income of $274M. Notably, Loews's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.93x while CNA Financial's PE ratio is 13.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loews is 1.13x versus 0.84x for CNA Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 8.34% compared to Loews's net margin of 12.58%. Loews's return on equity of 7.5% beat Progressive's return on equity of 34.35%.

Loews has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -64.81%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $286.0733 which suggests that it could grow by 16.07%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than Loews, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than Loews.

Loews has a beta of 0.702, which suggesting that the stock is 29.798% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.369, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.092%.

Loews has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.28%. Progressive offers a yield of 3.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Loews pays 3.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Loews quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.4B. Loews's net income of $370M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.6B. Notably, Loews's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.93x while Progressive's PE ratio is 16.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loews is 1.13x versus 1.84x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of 8.34% compared to Loews's net margin of 7.31%. Loews's return on equity of 7.5% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.75%.

Loews has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -64.81%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -3.41%. Given that Loews has more downside risk than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe Safety Insurance Group is more attractive than Loews.

Loews has a beta of 0.702, which suggesting that the stock is 29.798% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.255, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.478%.

Loews has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.28%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Loews pays 3.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 75.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Loews quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $299.6M. Loews's net income of $370M is higher than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $21.9M. Notably, Loews's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.93x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 14.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loews is 1.13x versus 0.94x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Selective Insurance Group has a net margin of 8.34% compared to Loews's net margin of 8.55%. Loews's return on equity of 7.5% beat Selective Insurance Group's return on equity of 7.57%.

Loews has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -64.81%. On the other hand Selective Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $94.67 which suggests that it could grow by 8.41%. Given that Selective Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Loews, analysts believe Selective Insurance Group is more attractive than Loews.

Loews has a beta of 0.702, which suggesting that the stock is 29.798% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Selective Insurance Group has a beta of 0.482, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.821%.

Loews has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.28%. Selective Insurance Group offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Loews pays 3.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Selective Insurance Group pays out 45.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Loews quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Selective Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Loews's net income of $370M is higher than Selective Insurance Group's net income of $109.9M. Notably, Loews's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.93x while Selective Insurance Group's PE ratio is 23.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loews is 1.13x versus 1.07x for Selective Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.