HOG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Motors has a net margin of 10.01% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of 6.32%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 10.7% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.33%.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $28.61, signalling upside risk potential of 19.77%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $55.64 which suggests that it could grow by 4.62%. Given that Harley-Davidson has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Harley-Davidson is more attractive than General Motors.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.299, which suggesting that the stock is 29.866% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.322, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.192%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.95%. General Motors offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $44B. Harley-Davidson's net income of $133.1M is lower than General Motors's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.91x while General Motors's PE ratio is 7.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.65x versus 0.31x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Acushnet Holdings has a net margin of 10.01% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of 14.13%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 10.7% beat Acushnet Holdings's return on equity of 26.12%.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $28.61, signalling upside risk potential of 19.77%. On the other hand Acushnet Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $68.43 which suggests that it could fall by -12.46%. Given that Harley-Davidson has higher upside potential than Acushnet Holdings, analysts believe Harley-Davidson is more attractive than Acushnet Holdings.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.299, which suggesting that the stock is 29.866% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Acushnet Holdings has a beta of 0.845, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.489%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.95%. Acushnet Holdings offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Acushnet Holdings pays out 25.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Acushnet Holdings quarterly revenues of $703.4M. Harley-Davidson's net income of $133.1M is higher than Acushnet Holdings's net income of $99.4M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.91x while Acushnet Holdings's PE ratio is 21.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.65x versus 2.00x for Acushnet Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Malibu Boats has a net margin of 10.01% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of 5.64%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 10.7% beat Malibu Boats's return on equity of -1.7%.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $28.61, signalling upside risk potential of 19.77%. On the other hand Malibu Boats has an analysts' consensus of $36.14 which suggests that it could grow by 9.92%. Given that Harley-Davidson has higher upside potential than Malibu Boats, analysts believe Harley-Davidson is more attractive than Malibu Boats.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.299, which suggesting that the stock is 29.866% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Malibu Boats has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.07%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.95%. Malibu Boats offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Malibu Boats pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Malibu Boats quarterly revenues of $228.7M. Harley-Davidson's net income of $133.1M is higher than Malibu Boats's net income of $12.9M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.91x while Malibu Boats's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.65x versus 0.86x for Malibu Boats. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 10.01% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of 2.12%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 10.7% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $28.61, signalling upside risk potential of 19.77%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $304.17 which suggests that it could fall by -5.44%. Given that Harley-Davidson has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Harley-Davidson is more attractive than Tesla.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.299, which suggesting that the stock is 29.866% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.394, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.423%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.95%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Harley-Davidson's net income of $133.1M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.91x while Tesla's PE ratio is 176.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.65x versus 11.78x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.