FMC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CF Industries Holdings has a net margin of -1.96% compared to FMC's net margin of 18.76%. FMC's return on equity of 7.31% beat CF Industries Holdings's return on equity of 17.25%.

FMC has a consensus price target of $49.23, signalling upside risk potential of 16.56%. On the other hand CF Industries Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $91.16 which suggests that it could fall by -0.68%. Given that FMC has higher upside potential than CF Industries Holdings, analysts believe FMC is more attractive than CF Industries Holdings.

FMC has a beta of 0.767, which suggesting that the stock is 23.31% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CF Industries Holdings has a beta of 0.958, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.177%.

FMC has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.49%. CF Industries Holdings offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. FMC pays 85.2% of its earnings as a dividend. CF Industries Holdings pays out 29.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FMC quarterly revenues are $791.4M, which are smaller than CF Industries Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.7B. FMC's net income of -$15.5M is lower than CF Industries Holdings's net income of $312M. Notably, FMC's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.12x while CF Industries Holdings's PE ratio is 12.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FMC is 1.29x versus 2.63x for CF Industries Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Corteva has a net margin of -1.96% compared to FMC's net margin of 14.76%. FMC's return on equity of 7.31% beat Corteva's return on equity of 4.6%.

FMC has a consensus price target of $49.23, signalling upside risk potential of 16.56%. On the other hand Corteva has an analysts' consensus of $78.48 which suggests that it could grow by 7.26%. Given that FMC has higher upside potential than Corteva, analysts believe FMC is more attractive than Corteva.

FMC has a beta of 0.767, which suggesting that the stock is 23.31% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Corteva has a beta of 0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.37%.

FMC has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.49%. Corteva offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. FMC pays 85.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Corteva pays out 50.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FMC quarterly revenues are $791.4M, which are smaller than Corteva quarterly revenues of $4.4B. FMC's net income of -$15.5M is lower than Corteva's net income of $652M. Notably, FMC's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.12x while Corteva's PE ratio is 44.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FMC is 1.29x versus 3.00x for Corteva. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Emerging Holdings has a net margin of -1.96% compared to FMC's net margin of --. FMC's return on equity of 7.31% beat Emerging Holdings's return on equity of --.

FMC has a consensus price target of $49.23, signalling upside risk potential of 16.56%. On the other hand Emerging Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FMC has higher upside potential than Emerging Holdings, analysts believe FMC is more attractive than Emerging Holdings.

FMC has a beta of 0.767, which suggesting that the stock is 23.31% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Emerging Holdings has a beta of -34.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3550.677%.

FMC has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.49%. Emerging Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FMC pays 85.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Emerging Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FMC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FMC quarterly revenues are $791.4M, which are larger than Emerging Holdings quarterly revenues of --. FMC's net income of -$15.5M is higher than Emerging Holdings's net income of --. Notably, FMC's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.12x while Emerging Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FMC is 1.29x versus -- for Emerging Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

S&W Seed has a net margin of -1.96% compared to FMC's net margin of -23.41%. FMC's return on equity of 7.31% beat S&W Seed's return on equity of -91.19%.

FMC has a consensus price target of $49.23, signalling upside risk potential of 16.56%. On the other hand S&W Seed has an analysts' consensus of $25.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1361.99%. Given that S&W Seed has higher upside potential than FMC, analysts believe S&W Seed is more attractive than FMC.

FMC has a beta of 0.767, which suggesting that the stock is 23.31% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison S&W Seed has a beta of 1.829, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.894%.

FMC has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.49%. S&W Seed offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FMC pays 85.2% of its earnings as a dividend. S&W Seed pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FMC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FMC quarterly revenues are $791.4M, which are larger than S&W Seed quarterly revenues of $9.6M. FMC's net income of -$15.5M is lower than S&W Seed's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, FMC's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.12x while S&W Seed's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FMC is 1.29x versus 0.07x for S&W Seed. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.