EMN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 7.95% compared to Eastman Chemical's net margin of 4.14%. Eastman Chemical's return on equity of 15.99% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.71%.

Eastman Chemical has a consensus price target of $96.34, signalling upside risk potential of 24.23%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eastman Chemical has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Eastman Chemical is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Eastman Chemical has a beta of 1.222, which suggesting that the stock is 22.172% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.485, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.545%.

Eastman Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.26%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Eastman Chemical pays 41.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eastman Chemical quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $129.2M. Eastman Chemical's net income of $182M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of $5.3M. Notably, Eastman Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.87x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 18.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical is 0.97x versus 0.24x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of 7.95% compared to Eastman Chemical's net margin of 2.78%. Eastman Chemical's return on equity of 15.99% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 6.41%.

Eastman Chemical has a consensus price target of $96.34, signalling upside risk potential of 24.23%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $69.00 which suggests that it could fall by -21.89%. Given that Eastman Chemical has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Eastman Chemical is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Eastman Chemical has a beta of 1.222, which suggesting that the stock is 22.172% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.443, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.285%.

Eastman Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.26%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Eastman Chemical pays 41.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Eastman Chemical's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kaiser Aluminum's is not.

Eastman Chemical quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $777.4M. Eastman Chemical's net income of $182M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $21.6M. Notably, Eastman Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.87x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 33.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical is 0.97x versus 0.47x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 7.95% compared to Eastman Chemical's net margin of --. Eastman Chemical's return on equity of 15.99% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Eastman Chemical has a consensus price target of $96.34, signalling upside risk potential of 24.23%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 149.19%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Eastman Chemical, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Eastman Chemical.

Eastman Chemical has a beta of 1.222, which suggesting that the stock is 22.172% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.135, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.451%.

Eastman Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.26%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eastman Chemical pays 41.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eastman Chemical's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eastman Chemical quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Eastman Chemical's net income of $182M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Eastman Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.87x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical is 0.97x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 7.95% compared to Eastman Chemical's net margin of --. Eastman Chemical's return on equity of 15.99% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Eastman Chemical has a consensus price target of $96.34, signalling upside risk potential of 24.23%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 128.94%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Eastman Chemical, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Eastman Chemical.

Eastman Chemical has a beta of 1.222, which suggesting that the stock is 22.172% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.534%.

Eastman Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.26%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eastman Chemical pays 41.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eastman Chemical's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eastman Chemical quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Eastman Chemical's net income of $182M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, Eastman Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.87x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical is 0.97x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.