EIX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

OGE Energy has a net margin of 39.15% compared to Edison International's net margin of 8.39%. Edison International's return on equity of 16.29% beat OGE Energy's return on equity of 10.65%.

Edison International has a consensus price target of $67.49, signalling upside risk potential of 32.49%. On the other hand OGE Energy has an analysts' consensus of $45.10 which suggests that it could grow by 2.21%. Given that Edison International has higher upside potential than OGE Energy, analysts believe Edison International is more attractive than OGE Energy.

Edison International has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.061% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OGE Energy has a beta of 0.588, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.166%.

Edison International has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.41%. OGE Energy offers a yield of 3.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Edison International pays 83.18% of its earnings as a dividend. OGE Energy pays out 76.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Edison International quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than OGE Energy quarterly revenues of $747.7M. Edison International's net income of $1.5B is higher than OGE Energy's net income of $62.7M. Notably, Edison International's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.23x while OGE Energy's PE ratio is 18.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Edison International is 1.14x versus 2.84x for OGE Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PG&E has a net margin of 39.15% compared to Edison International's net margin of 10.6%. Edison International's return on equity of 16.29% beat PG&E's return on equity of 8.56%.

Edison International has a consensus price target of $67.49, signalling upside risk potential of 32.49%. On the other hand PG&E has an analysts' consensus of $20.55 which suggests that it could grow by 56.17%. Given that PG&E has higher upside potential than Edison International, analysts believe PG&E is more attractive than Edison International.

Edison International has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.061% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PG&E has a beta of 0.552, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.839%.

Edison International has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.41%. PG&E offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Edison International pays 83.18% of its earnings as a dividend. PG&E pays out 3.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Edison International quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are smaller than PG&E quarterly revenues of $6B. Edison International's net income of $1.5B is higher than PG&E's net income of $634M. Notably, Edison International's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.23x while PG&E's PE ratio is 12.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Edison International is 1.14x versus 1.16x for PG&E. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pinnacle West Capital has a net margin of 39.15% compared to Edison International's net margin of -0.45%. Edison International's return on equity of 16.29% beat Pinnacle West Capital's return on equity of 8.88%.

Edison International has a consensus price target of $67.49, signalling upside risk potential of 32.49%. On the other hand Pinnacle West Capital has an analysts' consensus of $94.18 which suggests that it could grow by 3.6%. Given that Edison International has higher upside potential than Pinnacle West Capital, analysts believe Edison International is more attractive than Pinnacle West Capital.

Edison International has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.061% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pinnacle West Capital has a beta of 0.421, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.854%.

Edison International has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.41%. Pinnacle West Capital offers a yield of 3.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Edison International pays 83.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Pinnacle West Capital pays out 64.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Edison International quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Pinnacle West Capital quarterly revenues of $1B. Edison International's net income of $1.5B is higher than Pinnacle West Capital's net income of -$4.6M. Notably, Edison International's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.23x while Pinnacle West Capital's PE ratio is 18.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Edison International is 1.14x versus 2.05x for Pinnacle West Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verde Clean Fuels has a net margin of 39.15% compared to Edison International's net margin of --. Edison International's return on equity of 16.29% beat Verde Clean Fuels's return on equity of --.

Edison International has a consensus price target of $67.49, signalling upside risk potential of 32.49%. On the other hand Verde Clean Fuels has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Edison International has higher upside potential than Verde Clean Fuels, analysts believe Edison International is more attractive than Verde Clean Fuels.

Edison International has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.061% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verde Clean Fuels has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Edison International has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.41%. Verde Clean Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Edison International pays 83.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Verde Clean Fuels pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Edison International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Edison International quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Verde Clean Fuels quarterly revenues of --. Edison International's net income of $1.5B is higher than Verde Clean Fuels's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Edison International's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.23x while Verde Clean Fuels's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Edison International is 1.14x versus -- for Verde Clean Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.