AFL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CNO Financial Group has a net margin of 0.84% compared to Aflac's net margin of 1.36%. Aflac's return on equity of 14.16% beat CNO Financial Group's return on equity of 12.2%.

Aflac has a consensus price target of $107.23, signalling upside risk potential of 5.71%. On the other hand CNO Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $42.40 which suggests that it could grow by 15.56%. Given that CNO Financial Group has higher upside potential than Aflac, analysts believe CNO Financial Group is more attractive than Aflac.

Aflac has a beta of 0.810, which suggesting that the stock is 19.049% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNO Financial Group has a beta of 0.876, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.446%.

Aflac has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. CNO Financial Group offers a yield of 1.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Aflac pays 19.97% of its earnings as a dividend. CNO Financial Group pays out 16.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aflac quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than CNO Financial Group quarterly revenues of $1B. Aflac's net income of $29M is higher than CNO Financial Group's net income of $13.7M. Notably, Aflac's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.85x while CNO Financial Group's PE ratio is 12.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac is 3.30x versus 0.91x for CNO Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Globe Life has a net margin of 0.84% compared to Aflac's net margin of 17.2%. Aflac's return on equity of 14.16% beat Globe Life's return on equity of 20.89%.

Aflac has a consensus price target of $107.23, signalling upside risk potential of 5.71%. On the other hand Globe Life has an analysts' consensus of $146.91 which suggests that it could grow by 22.53%. Given that Globe Life has higher upside potential than Aflac, analysts believe Globe Life is more attractive than Aflac.

Aflac has a beta of 0.810, which suggesting that the stock is 19.049% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Globe Life has a beta of 0.561, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.855%.

Aflac has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. Globe Life offers a yield of 0.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Aflac pays 19.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Globe Life pays out 7.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aflac quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Globe Life quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Aflac's net income of $29M is lower than Globe Life's net income of $254.6M. Notably, Aflac's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.85x while Globe Life's PE ratio is 9.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac is 3.30x versus 1.79x for Globe Life. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trupanion has a net margin of 0.84% compared to Aflac's net margin of -0.43%. Aflac's return on equity of 14.16% beat Trupanion's return on equity of -1.34%.

Aflac has a consensus price target of $107.23, signalling upside risk potential of 5.71%. On the other hand Trupanion has an analysts' consensus of $54.75 which suggests that it could grow by 8.93%. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Aflac, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Aflac.

Aflac has a beta of 0.810, which suggesting that the stock is 19.049% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion has a beta of 1.817, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.724%.

Aflac has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. Trupanion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aflac pays 19.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aflac's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aflac quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Trupanion quarterly revenues of $342M. Aflac's net income of $29M is higher than Trupanion's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Aflac's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.85x while Trupanion's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac is 3.30x versus 1.62x for Trupanion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unum Group has a net margin of 0.84% compared to Aflac's net margin of 5.86%. Aflac's return on equity of 14.16% beat Unum Group's return on equity of 14.62%.

Aflac has a consensus price target of $107.23, signalling upside risk potential of 5.71%. On the other hand Unum Group has an analysts' consensus of $97.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20.6%. Given that Unum Group has higher upside potential than Aflac, analysts believe Unum Group is more attractive than Aflac.

Aflac has a beta of 0.810, which suggesting that the stock is 19.049% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unum Group has a beta of 0.409, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.141%.

Aflac has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. Unum Group offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Aflac pays 19.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Unum Group pays out 16.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aflac quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Unum Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Aflac's net income of $29M is lower than Unum Group's net income of $189.1M. Notably, Aflac's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.85x while Unum Group's PE ratio is 9.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac is 3.30x versus 1.16x for Unum Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.