SPXCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chenghe Acquisition II has a net margin of -- compared to Singapore Exchange's net margin of --. Singapore Exchange's return on equity of 34.64% beat Chenghe Acquisition II's return on equity of --.

Singapore Exchange has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Chenghe Acquisition II has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Singapore Exchange has higher upside potential than Chenghe Acquisition II, analysts believe Singapore Exchange is more attractive than Chenghe Acquisition II.

Singapore Exchange has a beta of 0.407, which suggesting that the stock is 59.328% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chenghe Acquisition II has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Singapore Exchange has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Chenghe Acquisition II offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Singapore Exchange pays 61.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Chenghe Acquisition II pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Singapore Exchange's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Singapore Exchange quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Chenghe Acquisition II quarterly revenues of --. Singapore Exchange's net income of -- is lower than Chenghe Acquisition II's net income of $226.4K. Notably, Singapore Exchange's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.34x while Chenghe Acquisition II's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singapore Exchange is 13.34x versus -- for Chenghe Acquisition II. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

BitFuFu has a net margin of -- compared to Singapore Exchange's net margin of -21.62%. Singapore Exchange's return on equity of 34.64% beat BitFuFu's return on equity of 1.34%.

Singapore Exchange has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BitFuFu has an analysts' consensus of $7.59 which suggests that it could grow by 106.25%. Given that BitFuFu has higher upside potential than Singapore Exchange, analysts believe BitFuFu is more attractive than Singapore Exchange.

Singapore Exchange has a beta of 0.407, which suggesting that the stock is 59.328% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BitFuFu has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Singapore Exchange has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. BitFuFu offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Singapore Exchange pays 61.04% of its earnings as a dividend. BitFuFu pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Singapore Exchange's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Singapore Exchange quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BitFuFu quarterly revenues of $78M. Singapore Exchange's net income of -- is lower than BitFuFu's net income of -$16.9M. Notably, Singapore Exchange's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.34x while BitFuFu's PE ratio is 10.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singapore Exchange is 13.34x versus 1.57x for BitFuFu. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lion Group Holding has a net margin of -- compared to Singapore Exchange's net margin of --. Singapore Exchange's return on equity of 34.64% beat Lion Group Holding's return on equity of -50.99%.

Singapore Exchange has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lion Group Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Singapore Exchange has higher upside potential than Lion Group Holding, analysts believe Singapore Exchange is more attractive than Lion Group Holding.

Singapore Exchange has a beta of 0.407, which suggesting that the stock is 59.328% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lion Group Holding has a beta of 2.333, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.3%.

Singapore Exchange has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Lion Group Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Singapore Exchange pays 61.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Lion Group Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Singapore Exchange's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Singapore Exchange quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lion Group Holding quarterly revenues of --. Singapore Exchange's net income of -- is lower than Lion Group Holding's net income of --. Notably, Singapore Exchange's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.34x while Lion Group Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singapore Exchange is 13.34x versus 0.02x for Lion Group Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RF Acquisition Corp II has a net margin of -- compared to Singapore Exchange's net margin of --. Singapore Exchange's return on equity of 34.64% beat RF Acquisition Corp II's return on equity of --.

Singapore Exchange has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand RF Acquisition Corp II has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Singapore Exchange has higher upside potential than RF Acquisition Corp II, analysts believe Singapore Exchange is more attractive than RF Acquisition Corp II.

Singapore Exchange has a beta of 0.407, which suggesting that the stock is 59.328% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RF Acquisition Corp II has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Singapore Exchange has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. RF Acquisition Corp II offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Singapore Exchange pays 61.04% of its earnings as a dividend. RF Acquisition Corp II pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Singapore Exchange's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Singapore Exchange quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than RF Acquisition Corp II quarterly revenues of --. Singapore Exchange's net income of -- is lower than RF Acquisition Corp II's net income of $1M. Notably, Singapore Exchange's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.34x while RF Acquisition Corp II's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singapore Exchange is 13.34x versus -- for RF Acquisition Corp II. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.