RYES Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Austin Gold has a net margin of -- compared to Rise Gold's net margin of --. Rise Gold's return on equity of -- beat Austin Gold's return on equity of --.

Rise Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Austin Gold has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 124.03%. Given that Austin Gold has higher upside potential than Rise Gold, analysts believe Austin Gold is more attractive than Rise Gold.

Rise Gold has a beta of -1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 227.842% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Austin Gold has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rise Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Austin Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rise Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Austin Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rise Gold quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Austin Gold quarterly revenues of --. Rise Gold's net income of -$756K is lower than Austin Gold's net income of -$499.5K. Notably, Rise Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Austin Gold's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rise Gold is -- versus -- for Austin Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Royalty has a net margin of -- compared to Rise Gold's net margin of -39.77%. Rise Gold's return on equity of -- beat Gold Royalty's return on equity of -0.59%.

Rise Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gold Royalty has an analysts' consensus of $3.33 which suggests that it could grow by 36.61%. Given that Gold Royalty has higher upside potential than Rise Gold, analysts believe Gold Royalty is more attractive than Rise Gold.

Rise Gold has a beta of -1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 227.842% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rise Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Rise Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rise Gold quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Royalty quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Rise Gold's net income of -$756K is higher than Gold Royalty's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Rise Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Royalty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rise Gold is -- versus 39.12x for Gold Royalty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McEwen has a net margin of -- compared to Rise Gold's net margin of -17.57%. Rise Gold's return on equity of -- beat McEwen's return on equity of -6.05%.

Rise Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand McEwen has an analysts' consensus of $15.06 which suggests that it could grow by 36.68%. Given that McEwen has higher upside potential than Rise Gold, analysts believe McEwen is more attractive than Rise Gold.

Rise Gold has a beta of -1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 227.842% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen has a beta of 0.985, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.544%.

Rise Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McEwen offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rise Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rise Gold quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than McEwen quarterly revenues of $35.7M. Rise Gold's net income of -$756K is higher than McEwen's net income of -$6.3M. Notably, Rise Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while McEwen's PE ratio is 3.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rise Gold is -- versus 3.39x for McEwen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold has a net margin of -- compared to Rise Gold's net margin of --. Rise Gold's return on equity of -- beat Seabridge Gold's return on equity of --.

Rise Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Seabridge Gold has an analysts' consensus of $41.58 which suggests that it could grow by 163.86%. Given that Seabridge Gold has higher upside potential than Rise Gold, analysts believe Seabridge Gold is more attractive than Rise Gold.

Rise Gold has a beta of -1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 227.842% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold has a beta of 0.667, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.275%.

Rise Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seabridge Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rise Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rise Gold quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Seabridge Gold quarterly revenues of --. Rise Gold's net income of -$756K is lower than Seabridge Gold's net income of $7.3M. Notably, Rise Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seabridge Gold's PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rise Gold is -- versus -- for Seabridge Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.