NPNYY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Japan Food Tech Holdings has a net margin of 19.63% compared to Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha's net margin of -1471.96%. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha's return on equity of 16.3% beat Japan Food Tech Holdings's return on equity of -241.02%.

Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Japan Food Tech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha has higher upside potential than Japan Food Tech Holdings, analysts believe Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha is more attractive than Japan Food Tech Holdings.

Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha has a beta of 1.033, which suggesting that the stock is 3.339% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Japan Food Tech Holdings has a beta of 45.515, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4451.471%.

Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.2%. Japan Food Tech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha pays 19.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Japan Food Tech Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Japan Food Tech Holdings quarterly revenues of $5.5K. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha's net income of $849.6M is higher than Japan Food Tech Holdings's net income of -$81.3K. Notably, Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.99x while Japan Food Tech Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha is 0.92x versus 0.00x for Japan Food Tech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kubota has a net margin of 19.63% compared to Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha's net margin of 5.8%. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha's return on equity of 16.3% beat Kubota's return on equity of 9.61%.

Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kubota has an analysts' consensus of $62.80 which suggests that it could grow by 16.49%. Given that Kubota has higher upside potential than Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, analysts believe Kubota is more attractive than Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha.

Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha has a beta of 1.033, which suggesting that the stock is 3.339% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kubota has a beta of 1.009, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.919%.

Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.2%. Kubota offers a yield of 3.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha pays 19.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota pays out 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are smaller than Kubota quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha's net income of $849.6M is higher than Kubota's net income of $271.1M. Notably, Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.99x while Kubota's PE ratio is 7.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha is 0.92x versus 0.62x for Kubota. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kyocera has a net margin of 19.63% compared to Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha's net margin of -3.6%. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha's return on equity of 16.3% beat Kyocera's return on equity of 0.75%.

Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of $12.32 which suggests that it could grow by 13.84%. Given that Kyocera has higher upside potential than Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, analysts believe Kyocera is more attractive than Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha.

Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha has a beta of 1.033, which suggesting that the stock is 3.339% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.307, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.335%.

Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.2%. Kyocera offers a yield of 3.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha pays 19.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 304.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kyocera's is not.

Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha's net income of $849.6M is higher than Kyocera's net income of -$116.4M. Notably, Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.99x while Kyocera's PE ratio is 92.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha is 0.92x versus 1.14x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LogProstyle has a net margin of 19.63% compared to Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha's net margin of --. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha's return on equity of 16.3% beat LogProstyle's return on equity of --.

Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LogProstyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha has higher upside potential than LogProstyle, analysts believe Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha is more attractive than LogProstyle.

Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha has a beta of 1.033, which suggesting that the stock is 3.339% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LogProstyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.2%. LogProstyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha pays 19.91% of its earnings as a dividend. LogProstyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than LogProstyle quarterly revenues of --. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha's net income of $849.6M is higher than LogProstyle's net income of --. Notably, Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.99x while LogProstyle's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha is 0.92x versus -- for LogProstyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.