KPELY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Guardforce AI has a net margin of -- compared to Keppel's net margin of --. Keppel's return on equity of 8.53% beat Guardforce AI's return on equity of -71.57%.

Keppel has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Guardforce AI has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 268.85%. Given that Guardforce AI has higher upside potential than Keppel, analysts believe Guardforce AI is more attractive than Keppel.

Keppel has a beta of 0.438, which suggesting that the stock is 56.203% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Guardforce AI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Keppel has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. Guardforce AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Keppel pays 63.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Guardforce AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Keppel's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Keppel quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Guardforce AI quarterly revenues of --. Keppel's net income of -- is lower than Guardforce AI's net income of --. Notably, Keppel's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.60x while Guardforce AI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Keppel is 2.35x versus 0.37x for Guardforce AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JE Cleantech Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Keppel's net margin of --. Keppel's return on equity of 8.53% beat JE Cleantech Holdings's return on equity of 4.95%.

Keppel has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand JE Cleantech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Keppel has higher upside potential than JE Cleantech Holdings, analysts believe Keppel is more attractive than JE Cleantech Holdings.

Keppel has a beta of 0.438, which suggesting that the stock is 56.203% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JE Cleantech Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Keppel has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. JE Cleantech Holdings offers a yield of 8.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Keppel pays 63.89% of its earnings as a dividend. JE Cleantech Holdings pays out 2009.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Keppel's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but JE Cleantech Holdings's is not.

Keppel quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than JE Cleantech Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Keppel's net income of -- is lower than JE Cleantech Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Keppel's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.60x while JE Cleantech Holdings's PE ratio is 12.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Keppel is 2.35x versus 0.37x for JE Cleantech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Multi Ways Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Keppel's net margin of --. Keppel's return on equity of 8.53% beat Multi Ways Holdings's return on equity of --.

Keppel has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Multi Ways Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Keppel has higher upside potential than Multi Ways Holdings, analysts believe Keppel is more attractive than Multi Ways Holdings.

Keppel has a beta of 0.438, which suggesting that the stock is 56.203% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Multi Ways Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Keppel has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. Multi Ways Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Keppel pays 63.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Multi Ways Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Keppel's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Keppel quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Multi Ways Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Keppel's net income of -- is lower than Multi Ways Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Keppel's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.60x while Multi Ways Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Keppel is 2.35x versus -- for Multi Ways Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.