GFLT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of -22345.34% compared to GenFlat Holdings's net margin of 5.54%. GenFlat Holdings's return on equity of -222.37% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -19.72%.

GenFlat Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GenFlat Holdings has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe GenFlat Holdings is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

GenFlat Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.118, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.241%.

GenFlat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 1.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. GenFlat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend.

GenFlat Holdings quarterly revenues are $7.9K, which are smaller than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7.2M. GenFlat Holdings's net income of -$554.7K is lower than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of $401K. Notably, GenFlat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GenFlat Holdings is -- versus 0.44x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of -22345.34% compared to GenFlat Holdings's net margin of -8.6%. GenFlat Holdings's return on equity of -222.37% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 7.38%.

GenFlat Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.61%. Given that CPI Aerostructures has higher upside potential than GenFlat Holdings, analysts believe CPI Aerostructures is more attractive than GenFlat Holdings.

GenFlat Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.222, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.201%.

GenFlat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GenFlat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GenFlat Holdings quarterly revenues are $7.9K, which are smaller than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $15.4M. GenFlat Holdings's net income of -$554.7K is higher than CPI Aerostructures's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, GenFlat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 25.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GenFlat Holdings is -- versus 0.58x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Energy Recovery has a net margin of -22345.34% compared to GenFlat Holdings's net margin of -122.51%. GenFlat Holdings's return on equity of -222.37% beat Energy Recovery's return on equity of 9.95%.

GenFlat Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Energy Recovery has an analysts' consensus of $14.50 which suggests that it could grow by 7.81%. Given that Energy Recovery has higher upside potential than GenFlat Holdings, analysts believe Energy Recovery is more attractive than GenFlat Holdings.

GenFlat Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.241%.

GenFlat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Energy Recovery offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GenFlat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Recovery pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GenFlat Holdings quarterly revenues are $7.9K, which are smaller than Energy Recovery quarterly revenues of $8.1M. GenFlat Holdings's net income of -$554.7K is higher than Energy Recovery's net income of -$9.9M. Notably, GenFlat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Energy Recovery's PE ratio is 36.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GenFlat Holdings is -- versus 5.48x for Energy Recovery. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyperscale Data has a net margin of -22345.34% compared to GenFlat Holdings's net margin of -16.81%. GenFlat Holdings's return on equity of -222.37% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -305.92%.

GenFlat Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 49528300.95%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than GenFlat Holdings, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than GenFlat Holdings.

GenFlat Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 4.234, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 323.375%.

GenFlat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GenFlat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -9.39% of its earnings as a dividend.

GenFlat Holdings quarterly revenues are $7.9K, which are smaller than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $25M. GenFlat Holdings's net income of -$554.7K is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, GenFlat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GenFlat Holdings is -- versus 0.02x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.