FSUGY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Indiana Resources has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue's net margin of --. Fortescue's return on equity of 26.33% beat Indiana Resources's return on equity of --.

Fortescue has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Indiana Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortescue has higher upside potential than Indiana Resources, analysts believe Fortescue is more attractive than Indiana Resources.

Fortescue has a beta of 1.070, which suggesting that the stock is 6.966% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Indiana Resources has a beta of 4.228, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 322.831%.

Fortescue has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.42%. Indiana Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Fortescue pays 72.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Indiana Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortescue's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fortescue quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Indiana Resources quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue's net income of -- is lower than Indiana Resources's net income of --. Notably, Fortescue's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.34x while Indiana Resources's PE ratio is 0.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue is 2.10x versus 0.11x for Indiana Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AIC Mines has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue's net margin of --. Fortescue's return on equity of 26.33% beat AIC Mines's return on equity of 6.71%.

Fortescue has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AIC Mines has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortescue has higher upside potential than AIC Mines, analysts believe Fortescue is more attractive than AIC Mines.

Fortescue has a beta of 1.070, which suggesting that the stock is 6.966% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AIC Mines has a beta of 0.193, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.692%.

Fortescue has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.42%. AIC Mines offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortescue pays 72.85% of its earnings as a dividend. AIC Mines pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortescue's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fortescue quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AIC Mines quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue's net income of -- is lower than AIC Mines's net income of --. Notably, Fortescue's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.34x while AIC Mines's PE ratio is 12.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue is 2.10x versus 0.94x for AIC Mines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nova Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue's net margin of --. Fortescue's return on equity of 26.33% beat Nova Minerals's return on equity of --.

Fortescue has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nova Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 172.93%. Given that Nova Minerals has higher upside potential than Fortescue, analysts believe Nova Minerals is more attractive than Fortescue.

Fortescue has a beta of 1.070, which suggesting that the stock is 6.966% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nova Minerals has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fortescue has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.42%. Nova Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortescue pays 72.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Nova Minerals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortescue's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fortescue quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nova Minerals quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue's net income of -- is lower than Nova Minerals's net income of --. Notably, Fortescue's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.34x while Nova Minerals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue is 2.10x versus -- for Nova Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sims has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue's net margin of --. Fortescue's return on equity of 26.33% beat Sims's return on equity of -4.33%.

Fortescue has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sims has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortescue has higher upside potential than Sims, analysts believe Fortescue is more attractive than Sims.

Fortescue has a beta of 1.070, which suggesting that the stock is 6.966% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sims has a beta of 1.242, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.16%.

Fortescue has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.42%. Sims offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Fortescue pays 72.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Sims pays out -70.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Fortescue's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fortescue quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sims quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue's net income of -- is lower than Sims's net income of --. Notably, Fortescue's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.34x while Sims's PE ratio is 36.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue is 2.10x versus 0.46x for Sims. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.