CLZNY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Glencore PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Clariant AG's net margin of --. Clariant AG's return on equity of 10.24% beat Glencore PLC's return on equity of -4.47%.

Clariant AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Glencore PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clariant AG has higher upside potential than Glencore PLC, analysts believe Clariant AG is more attractive than Glencore PLC.

Clariant AG has a beta of 0.717, which suggesting that the stock is 28.315% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Glencore PLC has a beta of 0.981, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.905%.

Clariant AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.7%. Glencore PLC offers a yield of 2.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Clariant AG pays 56.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Glencore PLC pays out -96.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Clariant AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clariant AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Glencore PLC quarterly revenues of --. Clariant AG's net income of -- is lower than Glencore PLC's net income of --. Notably, Clariant AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.24x while Glencore PLC's PE ratio is 17.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clariant AG is 0.77x versus 0.22x for Glencore PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Givaudan SA has a net margin of -- compared to Clariant AG's net margin of --. Clariant AG's return on equity of 10.24% beat Givaudan SA's return on equity of 25.06%.

Clariant AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Givaudan SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clariant AG has higher upside potential than Givaudan SA, analysts believe Clariant AG is more attractive than Givaudan SA.

Clariant AG has a beta of 0.717, which suggesting that the stock is 28.315% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Givaudan SA has a beta of 0.747, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.256%.

Clariant AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.7%. Givaudan SA offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.58 per share. Clariant AG pays 56.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Givaudan SA pays out 57.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clariant AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Givaudan SA quarterly revenues of --. Clariant AG's net income of -- is lower than Givaudan SA's net income of --. Notably, Clariant AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.24x while Givaudan SA's PE ratio is 37.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clariant AG is 0.77x versus 5.25x for Givaudan SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Holcim has a net margin of -- compared to Clariant AG's net margin of --. Clariant AG's return on equity of 10.24% beat Holcim's return on equity of 10.63%.

Clariant AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Holcim has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clariant AG has higher upside potential than Holcim, analysts believe Clariant AG is more attractive than Holcim.

Clariant AG has a beta of 0.717, which suggesting that the stock is 28.315% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Holcim has a beta of 1.088, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.818%.

Clariant AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.7%. Holcim offers a yield of 2.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Clariant AG pays 56.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Holcim pays out 53.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clariant AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Holcim quarterly revenues of --. Clariant AG's net income of -- is lower than Holcim's net income of --. Notably, Clariant AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.24x while Holcim's PE ratio is 20.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clariant AG is 0.77x versus 2.49x for Holcim. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sika AG has a net margin of -- compared to Clariant AG's net margin of --. Clariant AG's return on equity of 10.24% beat Sika AG's return on equity of 19.07%.

Clariant AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sika AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clariant AG has higher upside potential than Sika AG, analysts believe Clariant AG is more attractive than Sika AG.

Clariant AG has a beta of 0.717, which suggesting that the stock is 28.315% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sika AG has a beta of 1.252, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.155%.

Clariant AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.7%. Sika AG offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Clariant AG pays 56.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Sika AG pays out 21.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clariant AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sika AG quarterly revenues of --. Clariant AG's net income of -- is lower than Sika AG's net income of --. Notably, Clariant AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.24x while Sika AG's PE ratio is 31.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clariant AG is 0.77x versus 3.06x for Sika AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.