Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Sell
47
CILJF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$2.36
Seasonality move
:
-0.57%
Day range:
$2.36 - $2.36
52-week range:
$1.29 - $2.70
Dividend yield:
3.85%
P/E ratio:
4.17x
P/S ratio:
1.63x
P/B ratio:
0.91x
Volume:
20.8K
Avg. volume:
10K
1-year change:
67.38%
Market cap:
$66.7B
Revenue:
$42.2B
EPS (TTM):
$0.57
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CILJF
China Life Insurance
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DXF
Dunxin Financial Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LX
LexinFintech Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $11.55 |
|
NCTY
The9
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PT
Pintec Technology Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CILJF
China Life Insurance
|
$2.36 | -- | $66.7B | 4.17x | $0.06 | 3.85% | 1.63x |
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology
|
$0.31 | -- | $3.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.91x |
|
DXF
Dunxin Financial Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
LX
LexinFintech Holdings
|
$6.55 | $11.55 | $1.1B | 6.17x | $0.11 | 2.78% | 0.58x |
|
NCTY
The9
|
$9.97 | -- | $140.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.00x |
|
PT
Pintec Technology Holdings
|
$1.05 | -- | $16.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.41x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CILJF
China Life Insurance
|
7.22% | 1.155 | 10.09% | 8.48x |
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology
|
-8.59% | -1.503 | 0.63% | 0.26x |
|
DXF
Dunxin Financial Holdings
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
LX
LexinFintech Holdings
|
32.45% | 1.103 | 43.67% | 0.81x |
|
NCTY
The9
|
-- | -0.020 | -- | -- |
|
PT
Pintec Technology Holdings
|
-- | -0.381 | -- | 0.21x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CILJF
China Life Insurance
|
-- | -- | 20.53% | 21.79% | 53.26% | -- |
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology
|
$176.4K | -$706.2K | -86.81% | -90.72% | -63.06% | $355.7K |
|
DXF
Dunxin Financial Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LX
LexinFintech Holdings
|
$167.6M | $64.5M | 8.49% | 12.65% | 17.27% | -- |
|
NCTY
The9
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PT
Pintec Technology Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
China Life Insurance vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CILJF or AIHS?
Senmiao Technology has a net margin of 47.07% compared to China Life Insurance's net margin of -61.46%. China Life Insurance's return on equity of 21.79% beat Senmiao Technology's return on equity of -90.72%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CILJFChina Life Insurance-- $0.14 $80.7B AIHSSenmiao Technology19.18% -$0.05 $2.3M -
What do Analysts Say About CILJF or AIHS?
China Life Insurance has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Senmiao Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Life Insurance has higher upside potential than Senmiao Technology, analysts believe China Life Insurance is more attractive than Senmiao Technology.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CILJFChina Life Insurance0 0 0 AIHSSenmiao Technology0 0 0 -
Is CILJF or AIHS More Risky?
China Life Insurance has a beta of 0.272, which suggesting that the stock is 72.8% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Senmiao Technology has a beta of 0.599, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.108%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CILJF or AIHS?
China Life Insurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Senmiao Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Life Insurance pays 25.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Senmiao Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Life Insurance's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CILJF or AIHS?
China Life Insurance quarterly revenues are $8.4B, which are larger than Senmiao Technology quarterly revenues of $919.8K. China Life Insurance's net income of $4B is higher than Senmiao Technology's net income of -$565.3K. Notably, China Life Insurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.17x while Senmiao Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Life Insurance is 1.63x versus 0.91x for Senmiao Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CILJFChina Life Insurance1.63x 4.17x $8.4B $4B AIHSSenmiao Technology0.91x -- $919.8K -$565.3K
-
Which has Higher Returns CILJF or DXF?
Dunxin Financial Holdings has a net margin of 47.07% compared to China Life Insurance's net margin of --. China Life Insurance's return on equity of 21.79% beat Dunxin Financial Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CILJFChina Life Insurance-- $0.14 $80.7B DXFDunxin Financial Holdings-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CILJF or DXF?
China Life Insurance has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dunxin Financial Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Life Insurance has higher upside potential than Dunxin Financial Holdings, analysts believe China Life Insurance is more attractive than Dunxin Financial Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CILJFChina Life Insurance0 0 0 DXFDunxin Financial Holdings0 0 0 -
Is CILJF or DXF More Risky?
China Life Insurance has a beta of 0.272, which suggesting that the stock is 72.8% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dunxin Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CILJF or DXF?
China Life Insurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Dunxin Financial Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Life Insurance pays 25.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Dunxin Financial Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Life Insurance's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CILJF or DXF?
China Life Insurance quarterly revenues are $8.4B, which are larger than Dunxin Financial Holdings quarterly revenues of --. China Life Insurance's net income of $4B is higher than Dunxin Financial Holdings's net income of --. Notably, China Life Insurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.17x while Dunxin Financial Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Life Insurance is 1.63x versus -- for Dunxin Financial Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CILJFChina Life Insurance1.63x 4.17x $8.4B $4B DXFDunxin Financial Holdings-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CILJF or LX?
LexinFintech Holdings has a net margin of 47.07% compared to China Life Insurance's net margin of 13.86%. China Life Insurance's return on equity of 21.79% beat LexinFintech Holdings's return on equity of 12.65%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CILJFChina Life Insurance-- $0.14 $80.7B LXLexinFintech Holdings39.27% $0.33 $2.3B -
What do Analysts Say About CILJF or LX?
China Life Insurance has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LexinFintech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $11.55 which suggests that it could grow by 76.3%. Given that LexinFintech Holdings has higher upside potential than China Life Insurance, analysts believe LexinFintech Holdings is more attractive than China Life Insurance.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CILJFChina Life Insurance0 0 0 LXLexinFintech Holdings4 0 0 -
Is CILJF or LX More Risky?
China Life Insurance has a beta of 0.272, which suggesting that the stock is 72.8% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LexinFintech Holdings has a beta of 0.403, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.665%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CILJF or LX?
China Life Insurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. LexinFintech Holdings offers a yield of 2.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. China Life Insurance pays 25.17% of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings pays out 14.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CILJF or LX?
China Life Insurance quarterly revenues are $8.4B, which are larger than LexinFintech Holdings quarterly revenues of $426.7M. China Life Insurance's net income of $4B is higher than LexinFintech Holdings's net income of $59.2M. Notably, China Life Insurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.17x while LexinFintech Holdings's PE ratio is 6.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Life Insurance is 1.63x versus 0.58x for LexinFintech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CILJFChina Life Insurance1.63x 4.17x $8.4B $4B LXLexinFintech Holdings0.58x 6.17x $426.7M $59.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns CILJF or NCTY?
The9 has a net margin of 47.07% compared to China Life Insurance's net margin of --. China Life Insurance's return on equity of 21.79% beat The9's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CILJFChina Life Insurance-- $0.14 $80.7B NCTYThe9-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CILJF or NCTY?
China Life Insurance has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The9 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Life Insurance has higher upside potential than The9, analysts believe China Life Insurance is more attractive than The9.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CILJFChina Life Insurance0 0 0 NCTYThe90 0 0 -
Is CILJF or NCTY More Risky?
China Life Insurance has a beta of 0.272, which suggesting that the stock is 72.8% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The9 has a beta of 1.725, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.478%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CILJF or NCTY?
China Life Insurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. The9 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Life Insurance pays 25.17% of its earnings as a dividend. The9 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Life Insurance's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CILJF or NCTY?
China Life Insurance quarterly revenues are $8.4B, which are larger than The9 quarterly revenues of --. China Life Insurance's net income of $4B is higher than The9's net income of --. Notably, China Life Insurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.17x while The9's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Life Insurance is 1.63x versus 3.00x for The9. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CILJFChina Life Insurance1.63x 4.17x $8.4B $4B NCTYThe93.00x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CILJF or PT?
Pintec Technology Holdings has a net margin of 47.07% compared to China Life Insurance's net margin of --. China Life Insurance's return on equity of 21.79% beat Pintec Technology Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CILJFChina Life Insurance-- $0.14 $80.7B PTPintec Technology Holdings-- -- -$53.4M -
What do Analysts Say About CILJF or PT?
China Life Insurance has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pintec Technology Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Life Insurance has higher upside potential than Pintec Technology Holdings, analysts believe China Life Insurance is more attractive than Pintec Technology Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CILJFChina Life Insurance0 0 0 PTPintec Technology Holdings0 0 0 -
Is CILJF or PT More Risky?
China Life Insurance has a beta of 0.272, which suggesting that the stock is 72.8% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pintec Technology Holdings has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.195%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CILJF or PT?
China Life Insurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Pintec Technology Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Life Insurance pays 25.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Pintec Technology Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Life Insurance's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CILJF or PT?
China Life Insurance quarterly revenues are $8.4B, which are larger than Pintec Technology Holdings quarterly revenues of --. China Life Insurance's net income of $4B is higher than Pintec Technology Holdings's net income of --. Notably, China Life Insurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.17x while Pintec Technology Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Life Insurance is 1.63x versus 3.41x for Pintec Technology Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CILJFChina Life Insurance1.63x 4.17x $8.4B $4B PTPintec Technology Holdings3.41x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Can Levi Stock Double?
Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 58x
Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
82
SBET alert for Jul 17
SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 2.6% over the past day.
Buy
89
EXOD alert for Jul 17
Exodus Movement [EXOD] is down 4.14% over the past day.
Buy
60
U alert for Jul 17
Unity Software [U] is up 7.51% over the past day.
