Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Sell
41
CDTI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.48
Seasonality move
:
10.85%
Day range:
$0.41 - $0.41
52-week range:
$0.34 - $0.60
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.06x
P/B ratio:
0.56x
Volume:
157
Avg. volume:
6K
1-year change:
-1.2%
Market cap:
$1.7M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CDTI
CDTi Advanced Materials
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BWTL
Bowlin Travel Centers
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHPT
ChargePoint Holdings
|
$100.6M | -$0.06 | -12.18% | -62.43% | $1.15 |
|
DRVN
Driven Brands Holdings
|
$540.1M | $0.33 | -11.8% | 86.21% | $21.31 |
|
MCW
Mister Car Wash
|
$271.8M | $0.13 | 6.64% | 78.7% | $9.38 |
|
VVV
Valvoline
|
$436.5M | $0.45 | 3.76% | 30.08% | $42.62 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CDTI
CDTi Advanced Materials
|
$0.41 | -- | $1.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.06x |
|
BWTL
Bowlin Travel Centers
|
$4.05 | -- | $16M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CHPT
ChargePoint Holdings
|
$0.60 | $1.15 | $277.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.65x |
|
DRVN
Driven Brands Holdings
|
$17.35 | $21.31 | $2.9B | 391.00x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.22x |
|
MCW
Mister Car Wash
|
$6.43 | $9.38 | $2.1B | 25.72x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.09x |
|
VVV
Valvoline
|
$35.80 | $42.62 | $4.6B | 17.38x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.77x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CDTI
CDTi Advanced Materials
|
-- | 1.345 | -- | -- |
|
BWTL
Bowlin Travel Centers
|
-- | 0.276 | -- | -- |
|
CHPT
ChargePoint Holdings
|
72.19% | 1.563 | 107.07% | 0.97x |
|
DRVN
Driven Brands Holdings
|
80.46% | 0.851 | 94.06% | 0.80x |
|
MCW
Mister Car Wash
|
45.23% | 0.315 | 33.32% | 0.26x |
|
VVV
Valvoline
|
81.22% | 0.780 | 24.31% | 0.47x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CDTI
CDTi Advanced Materials
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BWTL
Bowlin Travel Centers
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHPT
ChargePoint Holdings
|
$28M | -$53.8M | -54.2% | -138.7% | -51.27% | -$34M |
|
DRVN
Driven Brands Holdings
|
$297.8M | $61.3M | -8.09% | -35.84% | 11.83% | $18.9M |
|
MCW
Mister Car Wash
|
$187.4M | $53.1M | 4.27% | 8.24% | 20.24% | $32.5M |
|
VVV
Valvoline
|
$150.5M | $67.7M | 19.78% | 160.95% | 16.82% | -$4.6M |
CDTi Advanced Materials vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CDTI or BWTL?
Bowlin Travel Centers has a net margin of -- compared to CDTi Advanced Materials's net margin of --. CDTi Advanced Materials's return on equity of -- beat Bowlin Travel Centers's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CDTICDTi Advanced Materials-- -- -- BWTLBowlin Travel Centers-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CDTI or BWTL?
CDTi Advanced Materials has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 936.59%. On the other hand Bowlin Travel Centers has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CDTi Advanced Materials has higher upside potential than Bowlin Travel Centers, analysts believe CDTi Advanced Materials is more attractive than Bowlin Travel Centers.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CDTICDTi Advanced Materials0 0 0 BWTLBowlin Travel Centers0 0 0 -
Is CDTI or BWTL More Risky?
CDTi Advanced Materials has a beta of -0.441, which suggesting that the stock is 144.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bowlin Travel Centers has a beta of -0.181, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.053%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CDTI or BWTL?
CDTi Advanced Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bowlin Travel Centers offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CDTi Advanced Materials pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bowlin Travel Centers pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CDTI or BWTL?
CDTi Advanced Materials quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bowlin Travel Centers quarterly revenues of --. CDTi Advanced Materials's net income of -- is lower than Bowlin Travel Centers's net income of --. Notably, CDTi Advanced Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bowlin Travel Centers's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CDTi Advanced Materials is 0.06x versus -- for Bowlin Travel Centers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CDTICDTi Advanced Materials0.06x -- -- -- BWTLBowlin Travel Centers-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CDTI or CHPT?
ChargePoint Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to CDTi Advanced Materials's net margin of -58.5%. CDTi Advanced Materials's return on equity of -- beat ChargePoint Holdings's return on equity of -138.7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CDTICDTi Advanced Materials-- -- -- CHPTChargePoint Holdings28.66% -$0.12 $426.4M -
What do Analysts Say About CDTI or CHPT?
CDTi Advanced Materials has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 936.59%. On the other hand ChargePoint Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $1.15 which suggests that it could grow by 90.37%. Given that CDTi Advanced Materials has higher upside potential than ChargePoint Holdings, analysts believe CDTi Advanced Materials is more attractive than ChargePoint Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CDTICDTi Advanced Materials0 0 0 CHPTChargePoint Holdings1 12 0 -
Is CDTI or CHPT More Risky?
CDTi Advanced Materials has a beta of -0.441, which suggesting that the stock is 144.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ChargePoint Holdings has a beta of 2.228, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 122.826%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CDTI or CHPT?
CDTi Advanced Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ChargePoint Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CDTi Advanced Materials pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ChargePoint Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CDTI or CHPT?
CDTi Advanced Materials quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ChargePoint Holdings quarterly revenues of $97.6M. CDTi Advanced Materials's net income of -- is lower than ChargePoint Holdings's net income of -$57.1M. Notably, CDTi Advanced Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ChargePoint Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CDTi Advanced Materials is 0.06x versus 0.65x for ChargePoint Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CDTICDTi Advanced Materials0.06x -- -- -- CHPTChargePoint Holdings0.65x -- $97.6M -$57.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns CDTI or DRVN?
Driven Brands Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to CDTi Advanced Materials's net margin of 1.07%. CDTi Advanced Materials's return on equity of -- beat Driven Brands Holdings's return on equity of -35.84%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CDTICDTi Advanced Materials-- -- -- DRVNDriven Brands Holdings57.7% $0.04 $3.3B -
What do Analysts Say About CDTI or DRVN?
CDTi Advanced Materials has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 936.59%. On the other hand Driven Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $21.31 which suggests that it could grow by 22.81%. Given that CDTi Advanced Materials has higher upside potential than Driven Brands Holdings, analysts believe CDTi Advanced Materials is more attractive than Driven Brands Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CDTICDTi Advanced Materials0 0 0 DRVNDriven Brands Holdings6 5 0 -
Is CDTI or DRVN More Risky?
CDTi Advanced Materials has a beta of -0.441, which suggesting that the stock is 144.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Driven Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CDTI or DRVN?
CDTi Advanced Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Driven Brands Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CDTi Advanced Materials pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Driven Brands Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CDTI or DRVN?
CDTi Advanced Materials quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Driven Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $516.2M. CDTi Advanced Materials's net income of -- is lower than Driven Brands Holdings's net income of $5.5M. Notably, CDTi Advanced Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Driven Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 391.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CDTi Advanced Materials is 0.06x versus 1.22x for Driven Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CDTICDTi Advanced Materials0.06x -- -- -- DRVNDriven Brands Holdings1.22x 391.00x $516.2M $5.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns CDTI or MCW?
Mister Car Wash has a net margin of -- compared to CDTi Advanced Materials's net margin of 10.32%. CDTi Advanced Materials's return on equity of -- beat Mister Car Wash's return on equity of 8.24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CDTICDTi Advanced Materials-- -- -- MCWMister Car Wash71.62% $0.08 $1.9B -
What do Analysts Say About CDTI or MCW?
CDTi Advanced Materials has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 936.59%. On the other hand Mister Car Wash has an analysts' consensus of $9.38 which suggests that it could grow by 45.8%. Given that CDTi Advanced Materials has higher upside potential than Mister Car Wash, analysts believe CDTi Advanced Materials is more attractive than Mister Car Wash.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CDTICDTi Advanced Materials0 0 0 MCWMister Car Wash9 5 0 -
Is CDTI or MCW More Risky?
CDTi Advanced Materials has a beta of -0.441, which suggesting that the stock is 144.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mister Car Wash has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CDTI or MCW?
CDTi Advanced Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mister Car Wash offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CDTi Advanced Materials pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mister Car Wash pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CDTI or MCW?
CDTi Advanced Materials quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mister Car Wash quarterly revenues of $261.7M. CDTi Advanced Materials's net income of -- is lower than Mister Car Wash's net income of $27M. Notably, CDTi Advanced Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mister Car Wash's PE ratio is 25.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CDTi Advanced Materials is 0.06x versus 2.09x for Mister Car Wash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CDTICDTi Advanced Materials0.06x -- -- -- MCWMister Car Wash2.09x 25.72x $261.7M $27M
-
Which has Higher Returns CDTI or VVV?
Valvoline has a net margin of -- compared to CDTi Advanced Materials's net margin of 9.33%. CDTi Advanced Materials's return on equity of -- beat Valvoline's return on equity of 160.95%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CDTICDTi Advanced Materials-- -- -- VVVValvoline37.33% $0.29 $1.3B -
What do Analysts Say About CDTI or VVV?
CDTi Advanced Materials has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 936.59%. On the other hand Valvoline has an analysts' consensus of $42.62 which suggests that it could grow by 19.04%. Given that CDTi Advanced Materials has higher upside potential than Valvoline, analysts believe CDTi Advanced Materials is more attractive than Valvoline.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CDTICDTi Advanced Materials0 0 0 VVVValvoline6 5 0 -
Is CDTI or VVV More Risky?
CDTi Advanced Materials has a beta of -0.441, which suggesting that the stock is 144.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valvoline has a beta of 1.176, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.585%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CDTI or VVV?
CDTi Advanced Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Valvoline offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CDTi Advanced Materials pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Valvoline pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CDTI or VVV?
CDTi Advanced Materials quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Valvoline quarterly revenues of $403.2M. CDTi Advanced Materials's net income of -- is lower than Valvoline's net income of $37.6M. Notably, CDTi Advanced Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Valvoline's PE ratio is 17.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CDTi Advanced Materials is 0.06x versus 2.77x for Valvoline. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CDTICDTi Advanced Materials0.06x -- -- -- VVVValvoline2.77x 17.38x $403.2M $37.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Can Levi Stock Double?
Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 58x
Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
82
SBET alert for Jul 17
SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 2.6% over the past day.
Buy
89
EXOD alert for Jul 17
Exodus Movement [EXOD] is down 4.14% over the past day.
Buy
60
U alert for Jul 17
Unity Software [U] is up 7.51% over the past day.
